Paper · 2013 · Experimental Agriculture

IMPROVING PRODUCTIVITY, WATER AND ENERGY USE EFFICIENCY IN LOWLAND RICE (ORYZA SATIVA) THROUGH APPROPRIATE ESTABLISHMENT METHODS AND NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN THE MID-ALTITUDE OF NORTH-EAST INDIA

ANUP DAS; D. P. PATEL; G. C. MUNDA; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Rice is the major staple food crop in the North Eastern Region of India (26.2 million hectare geographical area) and the region has a deficit of 1.40 million tones of rice, mainly due to low productivity (1.72 t ha −1 ). Field experiments were conducted for the first time to evaluate the new techniques of rice cultivation, viz. the system of rice intensification (SRI) and integrated crop management (ICM) along with conventional rice culture (CRC) for improving productivity, water and energy use efficiency during the rainy seasons of 2004–07 at the ICAR Research Complex for North Eastern Hill Region, Umiam, Meghalaya (950 m msl), India. Three stand establishment methods, viz. SRI, ICM and CRC in main plots, and five nutrient management practices, viz. recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF = 80:26:33 kg NPK ha −1 ), farmyard manure (FYM) 10 t ha −1 , RDF + FYM 5 t ha −1 , 50% RDF + FYM 10 t ha −1 , and a control (no fertilizer and manure) in sub-plots, were tested in a split-plot design; only few meaningful interactions were found. Results showed a higher number of panicles per square metre under CRC and ICM compared with SRI. However, the number of panicles per hill, grains per panicle and the test weight remained higher in the SRI method. In terms of mean grain yield, ICM (4.86 t ha −1 ) and SRI (4.72 t ha) produced 12.8 and 9.6%, respectively, higher grain yield over CRC (4.3 t ha −1 ). Among the nutrient management practices, the application of RDF + FYM 5 t ha −1 (5.0 t ha −1 ) and 50% RDF + FYM 10 t ha −1 (4.87 t ha −1 ) not only produced higher grain yield of rice (23.8 and 20.5%, respectively, higher yield over control) but also maintained higher soil available N, P and organic carbon at harvest compared with other nutrient management practices. Photosynthesis rate and water use efficiency were found to be significantly ( p < 0.05) higher under SRI, whereas the transpiration rate was higher under CRC. The ICM method recorded maximum net return and energy output to input ratio, which was followed by SRI and CRC. Therefore, the ICM method of rice cultivation would be the preferred option for the sub-tropical mid-hills of eastern Indian Himalayas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CRC and ICM had more panicles per square metre than SRI.

Treatment
CRC and ICMe0e1
Outcome
panicles per square metree0e1
Direction
highere0e1
Comparator
SRIe0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher number of panicles per square metre under CRC and ICM compared with SRI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1149 · show in text ↑
e1

“new techniques of rice cultivation, viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI had higher panicles per hill, grains per panicle and test weight.

Treatment
SRI methode0e1
Outcome
panicles per hill, grains per panicle and the test weighte0e1
Direction
highere0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of panicles per hill, grains per panicle and the test weight remained higher in the SRI method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1265 · show in text ↑
e1

“new techniques of rice cultivation, viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICM yielded 4.86 t ha−1, 12.8% above CRC.

Treatment
ICMe0e1
Outcome
grain yielde0e1
Direction
highere0e1
Value
4.86 t ha −1e0e1
Qualifier
12.8e0e1
Comparator
CRCe0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ICM (4.86 t ha −1 ) and SRI (4.72 t ha) produced 12.8 and 9.6%, respectively, higher grain yield over CRC (4.3 t ha −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1417 · show in text ↑
e1

“new techniques of rice cultivation, viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI yielded 4.72 t ha, 9.6% above CRC.

Treatment
SRIe0e1
Outcome
grain yielde0e1
Direction
highere0e1
Value
4.72 t hae0e1
Qualifier
9.6%e0e1
Comparator
CRCe0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ICM (4.86 t ha −1 ) and SRI (4.72 t ha) produced 12.8 and 9.6%, respectively, higher grain yield over CRC (4.3 t ha −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1417 · show in text ↑
e1

“new techniques of rice cultivation, viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus 5 t ha−1 FYM produced 5.0 t ha−1 rice yield.

Treatment
RDF + FYM 5 t ha −1e0e1e3
Outcome
grain yielde0e1e3
Direction
highere0e1e3
Value
5.0 t ha −1e0e1e3
Qualifier
23.8e0e1e3
Comparator
controle0e1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of RDF + FYM 5 t ha −1 (5.0 t ha −1 ) and 50% RDF + FYM 10 t ha −1 (4.87 t ha −1 ) not only produced higher grain yield of rice (23.8 and 20.5%, respectively, higher yield over control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1660 · show in text ↑
e1

“new techniques of rice cultivation, viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–337 · show in text ↑
e3

“the application of RDF + FYM 5 t ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half RDF plus 10 t ha−1 FYM produced 4.87 t ha−1 rice yield.

Treatment
50% RDF + FYM 10 t ha −1e0e1
Outcome
grain yielde0e1
Direction
highere0e1
Value
4.87 t ha −1e0e1
Qualifier
20.5%e0e1
Comparator
controle0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% RDF + FYM 10 t ha −1 (4.87 t ha −1 ) not only produced higher grain yield of rice (23.8 and 20.5%, respectively, higher yield over control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1660 · show in text ↑
e1

“new techniques of rice cultivation, viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both combined fertilizer and manure practices maintained more soil available nitrogen, phosphorus and organic carbon.

Treatment
RDF + FYM 5 t ha −1e0e1e3
Outcome
soil available N, P and organic carbone0e1e3
Direction
highere0e1e3
Comparator
other nutrient management practicese0e1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but also maintained higher soil available N, P and organic carbon at harvest compared with other nutrient management practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1788 · show in text ↑
e1

“new techniques of rice cultivation, viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–337 · show in text ↑
e3

“the application of RDF + FYM 5 t ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI significantly increased photosynthesis rate.

Treatment
SRIe0e1
Outcome
Photosynthesis ratee0e1
Direction
highere0e1
Value
p < 0.05e0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthesis rate and water use efficiency were found to be significantly ( p < 0.05) higher under SRI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1893 · show in text ↑
e1

“new techniques of rice cultivation, viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI significantly increased water use efficiency.

Treatment
SRIe0e1
Outcome
water use efficiencye0e1
Direction
highere0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthesis rate and water use efficiency were found to be significantly ( p < 0.05) higher under SRI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1893 · show in text ↑
e1

“new techniques of rice cultivation, viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CRC had higher transpiration rate.

Treatment
CRCe0e1
Outcome
transpiration ratee0e1
Direction
highere0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the transpiration rate was higher under CRC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1903–1947 · show in text ↑
e1

“new techniques of rice cultivation, viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICM gave the highest net return.

Treatment
ICM methode0e1
Outcome
net returne0e1
Direction
maximume0e1
Comparator
SRI and CRCe0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ICM method recorded maximum net return and energy output to input ratio, which was followed by SRI and CRC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1948–2059 · show in text ↑
e1

“new techniques of rice cultivation, viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICM gave the highest energy output to input ratio.

Treatment
ICM methode0e1
Outcome
energy output to input ratioe0e1
Direction
maximume0e1
Comparator
SRI and CRCe0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ICM method recorded maximum net return and energy output to input ratio, which was followed by SRI and CRC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1948–2059 · show in text ↑
e1

“new techniques of rice cultivation, viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–337 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors preferred ICM rice cultivation for the subtropical mid-hills of the eastern Indian Himalayas.

Treatment
ICM methode0e1
Outcome
preferred optione0e1
Setting
sub-tropical mid-hills of eastern Indian Himalayase0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ICM method of rice cultivation would be the preferred option for the sub-tropical mid-hills of eastern Indian Himalayas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2071–2195 · show in text ↑
e1

“new techniques of rice cultivation, viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–337 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 34 positive, 6 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

ipm · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

43 papers: 43 positive, 0 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.