Claim · model-written summary
ICM yielded 4.86 t ha−1, 12.8% above CRC.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0e1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“ICM (4.86 t ha −1 ) and SRI (4.72 t ha) produced 12.8 and 9.6%, respectively, higher grain yield over CRC (4.3 t ha −1 ).”
e1“new techniques of rice cultivation, viz.”
Title
ANUP DAS; D. P. PATEL; G. C. MUNDA; et al. Experimental Agriculture 2013. doi:10.1017/s0014479713000483
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect CRC and ICM had more panicles per square metre than SRI.
- Intervention effect SRI had higher panicles per hill, grains per panicle and test weight.
- Intervention effect SRI yielded 4.72 t ha, 9.6% above CRC.
- Intervention effect RDF plus 5 t ha−1 FYM produced 5.0 t ha−1 rice yield.
- Intervention effect Half RDF plus 10 t ha−1 FYM produced 4.87 t ha−1 rice yield.
- Intervention effect Both combined fertilizer and manure practices maintained more soil available nitrogen, phosphorus and organic carbon.
- Intervention effect SRI significantly increased photosynthesis rate.
- Intervention effect SRI significantly increased water use efficiency.
- Intervention effect CRC had higher transpiration rate.
- Intervention effect ICM gave the highest net return.
- Intervention effect ICM gave the highest energy output to input ratio.
- Recommendation The authors preferred ICM rice cultivation for the subtropical mid-hills of the eastern Indian Himalayas.