Paper · 2015 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Dissecting the contribution of microtubule behaviour in adventitious root induction

Mohamad Abu-Abied; Oksana Rogovoy (Stelmakh); Inna Mordehaev; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
28
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Induction of adventitious roots (ARs) in recalcitrant plants often culminates in cell division and callus formation rather than root differentiation. Evidence is provided here to suggest that microtubules (MTs) play a role in the shift from cell division to cell differentiation during AR induction. First, it was found that fewer ARs form in the temperature-sensitive mutant mor1-1, in which the MT-associated protein MOR1 is mutated, and in bot1-1, in which the MT-severing protein katanin is mutated. In the two latter mutants, MT dynamics and form are perturbed. By contrast, the number of ARs increased in RIC1-OX3 plants, in which MT bundling is enhanced and katanin is activated. In addition, any1 plants in which cell walls are perturbed made more ARs than wild-type plants. MT perturbations during AR induction in mor1-1 or in wild-type hypocotyls treated with oryzalin led to the formation of amorphous clusters of cells reminiscent of callus. In these cells a specific pattern of polarized light retardation by the cell walls was lost. PIN1 polarization and auxin maxima were hampered and differentiation of the epidermis was inhibited. It is concluded that a fine-tuned crosstalk between MTs, cell walls, and auxin transport is required for proper AR induction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mor1-1 mutant formed fewer adventitious roots.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee1
Material
mor1-1e0
Outcome
ARse0
Direction
fewere0

Verbatim

e0

“fewer ARs form in the temperature-sensitive mutant mor1-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–382 · show in text ↑
e1

“recalcitrant plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bot1-1 mutant formed fewer adventitious roots.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee1
Material
bot1-1e0
Outcome
ARse2
Direction
fewere2

Verbatim

e0

“and in bot1-1, in which the MT-severing protein katanin is mutated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–502 · show in text ↑
e1

“recalcitrant plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
e2

“fewer ARs form in the temperature-sensitive mutant mor1-1, in which the MT-associated protein MOR1 is mutated, and in bot1-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–449 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microtubule dynamics and form were perturbed in the two mutants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee1
Material
mutantse0
Outcome
MT dynamics and forme0
Direction
perturbede0

Verbatim

e0

“In the two latter mutants, MT dynamics and form are perturbed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–565 · show in text ↑
e1

“recalcitrant plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RIC1-OX3 plants formed more adventitious roots.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee1
Material
RIC1-OX3e0
Outcome
number of ARse0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“the number of ARs increased in RIC1-OX3 plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–626 · show in text ↑
e1

“recalcitrant plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The any1 mutant formed more adventitious roots than wild type.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Material
any1e0
Outcome
ARse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
wild-type plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“any1 plants in which cell walls are perturbed made more ARs than wild-type plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mor1-1 mutation caused callus-like cell clusters during root induction.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee1
Material
mor1-1e0
Treatment
MT perturbationse0
Outcome
formation of amorphous clusters of cells reminiscent of calluse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“MT perturbations during AR induction in mor1-1 or in wild-type hypocotyls treated with oryzalin led to the formation of amorphous clusters of cells reminiscent of callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–952 · show in text ↑
e1

“recalcitrant plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oryzalin treatment produced callus-like cell clusters in wild-type hypocotyls.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee1
Organ / stage
hypocotylse0
Treatment
treated with oryzaline0
Outcome
formation of amorphous clusters of cells reminiscent of calluse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“wild-type hypocotyls treated with oryzalin led to the formation of amorphous clusters of cells reminiscent of callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–952 · show in text ↑
e1

“recalcitrant plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cell-wall polarized-light retardation pattern was lost in those cells.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee1
Outcome
pattern of polarized light retardation by the cell wallse0
Direction
loste0

Verbatim

e0

“a specific pattern of polarized light retardation by the cell walls was lost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1045 · show in text ↑
e1

“recalcitrant plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PIN1 polarization and auxin maxima were hampered.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee1
Outcome
PIN1 polarization and auxin maximae0
Direction
hamperede0

Verbatim

e0

“PIN1 polarization and auxin maxima were hampered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1095 · show in text ↑
e1

“recalcitrant plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epidermal differentiation was inhibited.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee1
Organ / stage
epidermise0
Outcome
differentiation of the epidermise0
Direction
inhibitede0

Verbatim

e0

“differentiation of the epidermis was inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1146 · show in text ↑
e1

“recalcitrant plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that microtubule, wall and auxin-transport crosstalk is required for root induction.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee1
Outcome
proper AR inductione0
Qualifier
crosstalk between MTs, cell walls, and auxin transporte0

Verbatim

e0

“a fine-tuned crosstalk between MTs, cell walls, and auxin transport is required for proper AR induction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1272 · show in text ↑
e1

“recalcitrant plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑