Paper · 2012 · Plant Pathology

Biocontrol and population dynamics of Fusarium spp. on wheat stubble in Argentina

J. M. Palazzini; B. H. Groenenboom‐de Haas; A. M. Torres; et al.

16
claims
29
verbatim quotes
52
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The biocontrol effect of C lonostachys rosea (strains 016 and 1457) on F usarium graminearum , F . avenaceum , F . verticillioides , F . langsethiae , F . poae , F . sporotrichioides , F . culmorum and M icrodochium nivale was evaluated on naturally infected wheat stalks exposed to field conditions for 180 days. Experiments were conducted at two locations in A rgentina, M arcos J uarez and R ío C uarto. Antagonists were applied as conidial suspensions at two inoculum levels. Pathogens were quantified by T aq M an real‐time q PCR . During the first year at M arcos J uarez, biocontrol was observed in one antagonist treatment for F . graminearum after 90 days (73% reduction) but after 180 days, the pathogen decreased to undetectable levels. During the second year, biocontrol was observed in three antagonist treatments for F . graminearum and F . avenaceum (68·3% and 98·9% DNA reduction, respectively, after 90 days). Fusarium verticillioides was not controlled at M arcos J uarez. At R ío C uarto, biocontrol effects were observed in several treatments at different intervals, with a mean DNA reduction of 88·7% for F . graminearum and F . avenaceum , and 100% reduction for F . verticillioides in two treatments after 180 days. Populations of F . avenaceum and F . verticillioides were stable; meanwhile, F . graminearum population levels varied during the first 90 days, and low levels were observed after 180 days. The other pathogens were not detected. The study showed that wheat stalks were important reservoirs for F . avenaceum and F . verticillioides populations but less favourable for F . graminearum survival. Clonostachys rosea (strain 1457) showed potential to reduce the F usarium spp. on wheat stalks.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One antagonist treatment reduced F. graminearum by 73% after 90 days in the first year.

Treatment
antagonist treatmente0
Interactor
F . graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
F . graminearume0
Direction
reductione0
Value
73%e0
Setting
M arcos J uareze0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the first year at M arcos J uarez, biocontrol was observed in one antagonist treatment for F . graminearum after 90 days (73% reduction)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat stubble”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pathogen reached undetectable levels after 180 days.

Outcome
the pathogene0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
undetectable levelse0

Not reportedInteractorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after 180 days, the pathogen decreased to undetectable levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat stubble”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three antagonist treatments reduced F. graminearum DNA by 68·3% after 90 days in year two.

Treatment
antagonist treatmentse0
Interactor
F . graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
F . graminearume0
Direction
reductione0
Value
68·3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the second year, biocontrol was observed in three antagonist treatments for F . graminearum and F . avenaceum (68·3% and 98·9% DNA reduction, respectively, after 90 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat stubble”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three antagonist treatments reduced F. avenaceum DNA by 98·9% after 90 days in year two.

Treatment
antagonist treatmentse0
Interactor
F . avenaceumFusarium avenaceume0pathogen
Outcome
F . avenaceume0
Direction
reductione0
Value
98·9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium avenaceum
Fusarium avenaceum · InteractorGlimmerpilzchen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the second year, biocontrol was observed in three antagonist treatments for F . graminearum and F . avenaceum (68·3% and 98·9% DNA reduction, respectively, after 90 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat stubble”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium verticillioides was not controlled at Marcos Juarez.

Interactor
Fusarium verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidese0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium verticillioidese0
Direction
not controllede0
Setting
M arcos J uareze0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium verticillioides was not controlled at M arcos J uarez”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat stubble”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocontrol reduced F. graminearum DNA by a mean 88·7% at Rio Cuarto.

Treatment
several treatmentse0
Interactor
F . graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
F . graminearume0
Direction
reductione0
Value
88·7%e0
Setting
R ío C uartoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At R ío C uarto, biocontrol effects were observed in several treatments at different intervals, with a mean DNA reduction of 88·7% for F . graminearum and F . avenaceum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat stubble”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocontrol reduced F. avenaceum DNA by a mean 88·7% at Rio Cuarto.

Treatment
several treatmentse0
Interactor
F . avenaceumFusarium avenaceume0pathogen
Outcome
F . avenaceume0
Direction
reductione0
Value
88·7%e0
Setting
R ío C uartoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium avenaceum
Fusarium avenaceum · InteractorGlimmerpilzchen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At R ío C uarto, biocontrol effects were observed in several treatments at different intervals, with a mean DNA reduction of 88·7% for F . graminearum and F . avenaceum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat stubble”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two treatments reduced F. verticillioides DNA by 100% after 180 days.

Treatment
two treatmentse0
Interactor
F . verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidese0pathogen
Outcome
F . verticillioidese0
Direction
reductione0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% reduction for F . verticillioides in two treatments after 180 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat stubble”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. avenaceum populations were stable.

Interactor
F . avenaceumFusarium avenaceume0pathogen
Outcome
Populations of F . avenaceume0
Direction
stablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium avenaceum
Fusarium avenaceum · InteractorGlimmerpilzchen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Populations of F . avenaceum and F . verticillioides were stable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat stubble”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. verticillioides populations were stable.

Interactor
F . verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidese0pathogen
Outcome
F . verticillioidese0
Direction
stablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Populations of F . avenaceum and F . verticillioides were stable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat stubble”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. graminearum populations varied during 90 days and were low by 180 days.

Interactor
F . graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
F . graminearum population levelse0
Direction
low levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F . graminearum population levels varied during the first 90 days, and low levels were observed after 180 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat stubble”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other pathogens were not detected.

Outcome
other pathogens were not detectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The other pathogens were not detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1465 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat stubble”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat stalks were important reservoirs for F. avenaceum.

Interactor
F . avenaceumFusarium avenaceume0pathogen
Outcome
important reservoirs for F . avenaceume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium avenaceum
Fusarium avenaceum · InteractorGlimmerpilzchen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat stalks were important reservoirs for F . avenaceum and F . verticillioides populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1581 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat stalks were important reservoirs for F. verticillioides.

Interactor
F . verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidese0pathogen
Outcome
important reservoirs for F . avenaceum and F . verticillioides populationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat stalks were important reservoirs for F . avenaceum and F . verticillioides populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1581 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat stalks were less favourable for F. graminearum survival.

Interactor
F . graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
F . graminearum survivale0
Direction
less favourablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but less favourable for F . graminearum survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1630 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat stubble”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. rosea strain 1457 showed potential to reduce Fusarium on wheat stalks.

Interactor
F usarium spp.e0pathogen
Second interactor
Clonostachys roseaClonostachys roseae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
F usarium spp. on wheat stalkse0
Direction
reducee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Clonostachys rosea
Clonostachys rosea · Second interactor(c) Michel Langeveld, some rights reserved (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clonostachys rosea (strain 1457) showed potential to reduce the F usarium spp. on wheat stalks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1726 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.