Paper · 1988 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Some effects of stripe rust infection in wheats with adult plant resistance

RF Park; RG Rees; GJ Platz

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of early and full season epidemics by stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. Tritici) were examined in 12 wheat cultivars with different levels of adult plant resistance (APR). The APR in Cook, Bass, Banks, Kite, and Suneca was generally effective in preventing detectable yield losses due to stripe rust infection. Cultivars with lower levels of APR experienced yield losses of 15-25%, compared with 45-50% reduction for the susceptible cultivar Teal. Severe stripe rust infection early in the season, prior to node formation, resulted in significant yield reductions only in the more susceptible cultivars. Yield reductions were usually associated with reduced grain weight, and no reduction in tillering was detected in diseased plants. Severe stripe rust infection did not significantly affect the concentration of grain phosphorus, but did result in reduced grain nitrogen concentration in the more susceptible cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adult plant resistance in five cultivars generally prevented detectable rust yield losses.

Material
Cook, Bass, Banks, Kite, and Sunecae0
Interactor
stripe ruste0pathogen
Outcome
detectable yield losses due to stripe rust infectione0
Direction
preventinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The APR in Cook, Bass, Banks, Kite, and Suneca was generally effective in preventing detectable yield losses due to stripe rust infection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–325 · show in text ↑
e1

“12 wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars with lower adult plant resistance lost 15-25% yield.

Material
Cultivars with lower levels of APRe0
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Value
15-25%e0
Comparator
susceptible cultivar Teale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars with lower levels of APR experienced yield losses of 15-25%, compared with 45-50% reduction for the susceptible cultivar Teal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–462 · show in text ↑
e1

“12 wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Susceptible Teal lost 45-50% yield.

Material
Teale0
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
45-50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“45-50% reduction for the susceptible cultivar Teal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–461 · show in text ↑
e1

“12 wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe early infection significantly reduced yield only in more susceptible cultivars.

Treatment
Severe stripe rust infection early in the seasone0
Interactor
stripe ruste0pathogen
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Qualifier
only in the more susceptible cultivarse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Severe stripe rust infection early in the season, prior to node formation, resulted in significant yield reductions only in the more susceptible cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–618 · show in text ↑
e1

“12 wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–131 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rust-associated yield reductions were usually linked to lower grain weight.

Interactor
stripe ruste2pathogen
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
Yield reductionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield reductions were usually associated with reduced grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–685 · show in text ↑
e1

“12 wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–131 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield losses due to stripe rust infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–324 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No reduction in tillering was detected in diseased plants.

Outcome
tilleringe0
Direction
no reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no reduction in tillering was detected in diseased plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–748 · show in text ↑
e1

“12 wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe rust infection did not significantly affect grain phosphorus concentration.

Treatment
Severe stripe rust infectione0
Interactor
stripe ruste0pathogen
Outcome
concentration of grain phosphoruse0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Severe stripe rust infection did not significantly affect the concentration of grain phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–845 · show in text ↑
e1

“12 wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe rust infection reduced grain nitrogen concentration in susceptible cultivars.

Treatment
Severe stripe rust infectione0
Interactor
stripe ruste0pathogen
Outcome
grain nitrogen concentratione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
more susceptible cultivarse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Severe stripe rust infection did not significantly affect the concentration of grain phosphorus, but did result in reduced grain nitrogen concentration in the more susceptible cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–936 · show in text ↑
e1

“12 wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–131 · show in text ↑

infection · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

infection · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 14 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

infection · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 32 positive, 51 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 72 positive, 82 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.