Paper · 1994 · Tree Physiology

Effects of elevated CO2, nutrition and climatic warming on bud phenology in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) and their impact on the risk of frost damage

M. B. Murray; R. I. Smith; I. D. Leith; et al.

17
claims
39
verbatim quotes
123
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of elevated CO(2), clone and plant nutrition on bud dormancy of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) were examined. Sitka spruce seedlings were fumigated with ambient or elevated (ambient + 350 micro mol mol(-1)) concentrations of CO(2) in open-top chambers for three growing seasons. In 1991 and 1992, elevated CO(2) delayed bud burst in the spring and advanced bud set in the autumn. The effect of the open-top chamber on the thermal requirement for bud burst was greater than the effect of elevated CO(2) (50 and 30 day degrees (D(d)), respectively). In a second study, four clones of Sitka spruce taken from two provenances, at 43 and 54 degrees N, were fumigated with ambient or elevated CO(2). There was a large natural variation in the timing of bud burst and bud set among the clones. Elevated CO(2) had no effect on bud dormancy of the Skidegate a clone, but it reduced the growing season of the North Bend b clone by 20 days. In a third study, Sitka spruce seedlings growing in ambient or elevated CO(2), were supplied with one of three nutrient regimes, low (0.1 x potential), medium (0.5 x potential) or high (2.0 x potential), using a method and solution based on the Ingestad technique. Elevated CO(2) did not affect bud dormancy in the high-nutrient treatment, but it reduced the growing season of plants in the low-nutrient treatment by 22 days. Increasing plant nutrient supply lengthened the growing season, plants flushed earlier in the spring and set bud later in the autumn. The effects of elevated CO(2) plus a 0, 2 or 4 degrees C climatic warming on the timing of bud burst and the subsequent risk of frost damage were assessed using a simulation model and meteorological data from three sites, Edinburgh, Braemar and Masset. The model predicted that (i) doubling the CO(2) concentration in the absence of climatic warming, will delay the onset of bud burst at all three sites, (ii) climatic warming in ambient CO(2) will hasten bud burst and (iii) climatic warming in elevated CO(2) will hasten bud burst at Edinburgh and Braemar but to a lesser extent than climatic warming alone. At Masset, a 4 degrees C warming was required to advance the date of bud burst of seedlings in the elevated CO(2) treatment. At all three sites, elevated CO(2) and climatic warming increased the mean daily temperature on the date of bud burst, thus reducing the risk of subsequent frost damage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide delayed spring bud burst in 1991 and 1992.

Taxon
Sitka sprucePicea sitchensise1
Treatment
elevated CO(2)e0
Outcome
bud burste0
Direction
delayede0
Qualifier
1991 and 1992e0
Comparator
ambiente1
Setting
open-top chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1991 and 1992, elevated CO(2) delayed bud burst in the spring and advanced bud set in the autumn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–402 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sitka spruce seedlings were fumigated with ambient or elevated (ambient + 350 micro mol mol(-1)) concentrations of CO(2) in open-top chambers for three growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide advanced autumn bud set in 1991 and 1992.

Taxon
Sitka sprucePicea sitchensise1
Treatment
elevated CO(2)e0
Outcome
bud sete0
Direction
advancede0
Qualifier
1991 and 1992e0
Comparator
ambiente1
Setting
open-top chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1991 and 1992, elevated CO(2) delayed bud burst in the spring and advanced bud set in the autumn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–402 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sitka spruce seedlings were fumigated with ambient or elevated (ambient + 350 micro mol mol(-1)) concentrations of CO(2) in open-top chambers for three growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Open-top chambers had a greater effect on thermal bud-burst requirements than elevated carbon dioxide, at 50 versus 30 day degrees.

Taxon
Sitka sprucePicea sitchensist0
Treatment
open-top chambere0
Outcome
thermal requirement for bud burste0
Direction
greatere0
Value
50 and 30 day degrees (D(d))e0
Comparator
elevated CO(2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of the open-top chamber on the thermal requirement for bud burst was greater than the effect of elevated CO(2) (50 and 30 day degrees (D(d)), respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–570 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sitka spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bud burst and bud set timing varied widely among Sitka spruce clones.

Taxon
Sitka sprucePicea sitchensist0
Outcome
timing of bud burst and bud sete0
Qualifier
large natural variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a large natural variation in the timing of bud burst and bud set among the clones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sitka spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide had no effect on Skidegate a bud dormancy.

Taxon
Sitka sprucePicea sitchensist0
Material
Skidegate ae0
Treatment
Elevated CO(2)e0
Outcome
bud dormancye0
Direction
no effecte0
Comparator
ambiente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated CO(2) had no effect on bud dormancy of the Skidegate a clone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–879 · show in text ↑
e1

“were fumigated with ambient or elevated CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sitka spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide shortened the North Bend b growing season by 20 days.

Taxon
Sitka sprucePicea sitchensist0
Material
North Bend be0
Treatment
Elevated CO(2)e0
Outcome
growing seasone0
Direction
reducede0
Value
20 dayse0
Comparator
ambiente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated CO(2) had no effect on bud dormancy of the Skidegate a clone, but it reduced the growing season of the North Bend b clone by 20 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–952 · show in text ↑
e1

“were fumigated with ambient or elevated CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sitka spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide did not affect bud dormancy at high nutrient supply.

Taxon
Sitka sprucePicea sitchensise1
Treatment
Elevated CO(2)e0
Outcome
bud dormancye0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
high-nutrient treatmente0
Comparator
ambiente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated CO(2) did not affect bud dormancy in the high-nutrient treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1291 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sitka spruce seedlings growing in ambient or elevated CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide shortened the low-nutrient growing season by 22 days.

Taxon
Sitka sprucePicea sitchensise1
Treatment
Elevated CO(2)e0
Outcome
growing seasone0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22 dayse0
Qualifier
low-nutrient treatmente0
Comparator
ambiente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated CO(2) did not affect bud dormancy in the high-nutrient treatment, but it reduced the growing season of plants in the low-nutrient treatment by 22 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1378 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sitka spruce seedlings growing in ambient or elevated CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nutrient supply lengthened the growing season.

Taxon
Sitka sprucePicea sitchensist0
Treatment
Increasing plant nutrient supplye0
Outcome
growing seasone0
Direction
lengthenede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing plant nutrient supply lengthened the growing season, plants flushed earlier in the spring and set bud later in the autumn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sitka spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nutrient supply advanced spring flushing.

Taxon
Sitka sprucePicea sitchensist0
Treatment
Increasing plant nutrient supplye0
Outcome
flushede0
Direction
earliere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing plant nutrient supply lengthened the growing season, plants flushed earlier in the spring and set bud later in the autumn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sitka spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nutrient supply delayed autumn bud set.

Taxon
Sitka sprucePicea sitchensist0
Treatment
Increasing plant nutrient supplye0
Outcome
set bude0
Direction
latere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing plant nutrient supply lengthened the growing season, plants flushed earlier in the spring and set bud later in the autumn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sitka spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The model predicted delayed bud burst with doubled carbon dioxide without warming at all three sites.

Taxon
Sitka sprucePicea sitchensist0
Treatment
doubling the CO(2) concentratione0
Outcome
onset of bud burste0
Direction
delaye0
Qualifier
absence of climatic warminge0
Setting
Edinburgh, Braemar and Massete1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“doubling the CO(2) concentration in the absence of climatic warming, will delay the onset of bud burst at all three sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1916 · show in text ↑
e1

“three sites, Edinburgh, Braemar and Masset”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1764 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sitka spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The model predicted faster bud burst under warming in ambient carbon dioxide.

Taxon
Sitka sprucePicea sitchensist0
Treatment
climatic warminge0
Outcome
bud burste0
Direction
hastene0
Qualifier
ambient CO(2)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“climatic warming in ambient CO(2) will hasten bud burst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1923–1978 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sitka spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Warming under elevated carbon dioxide hastened bud burst at Edinburgh and Braemar less than warming alone.

Taxon
Sitka sprucePicea sitchensist0
Treatment
climatic warming in elevated CO(2)e0
Outcome
bud burste0
Direction
hastene0
Qualifier
to a lesser extente0
Comparator
climatic warming alonee0
Setting
Edinburgh and Braemare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“climatic warming in elevated CO(2) will hasten bud burst at Edinburgh and Braemar but to a lesser extent than climatic warming alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1989–2122 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sitka spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

At Masset, advancing bud burst under elevated carbon dioxide required 4 degrees C warming.

Taxon
Sitka sprucePicea sitchensist0
Treatment
4 degrees C warminge0
Outcome
date of bud burste0
Direction
advancee0
Qualifier
elevated CO(2) treatmente0
Setting
Massete0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Masset, a 4 degrees C warming was required to advance the date of bud burst of seedlings in the elevated CO(2) treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2123–2247 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sitka spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide and warming increased mean daily temperature at bud burst at all three sites.

Taxon
Sitka sprucePicea sitchensist0
Treatment
elevated CO(2) and climatic warminge0
Outcome
mean daily temperature on the date of bud burste0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Edinburgh, Braemar and Massete1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At all three sites, elevated CO(2) and climatic warming increased the mean daily temperature on the date of bud burst, thus reducing the risk of subsequent frost damage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2248–2417 · show in text ↑
e1

“three sites, Edinburgh, Braemar and Masset”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1764 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sitka spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide and warming reduced modeled subsequent frost-damage risk at all three sites.

Taxon
Sitka sprucePicea sitchensist0
Treatment
elevated CO(2) and climatic warminge0
Outcome
risk of subsequent frost damagee0
Direction
reducinge0
Setting
Edinburgh, Braemar and Massete1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At all three sites, elevated CO(2) and climatic warming increased the mean daily temperature on the date of bud burst, thus reducing the risk of subsequent frost damage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2248–2417 · show in text ↑
e1

“three sites, Edinburgh, Braemar and Masset”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1764 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sitka spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Picea sitchensis (Sitka spruce)Results differ

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.