Paper · 1993 · Journal of General Virology

Interference with brome mosaic virus replication by targeting the minus strand promoter

C. C. Huntley; T. C. Hall

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sense and antisense strategies for interfering with the replication of brome mosaic virus (BMV) were examined. The effects of 200 nucleotide-long sense and antisense transcripts, corresponding to the viral 3' end (-) strand promoter, on the accumulation of progeny viral RNAs were studied by co-inoculation with wildtype BMV RNAs. Progeny accumulation in barley protoplasts transfected with either sense or antisense transcripts of the (-) strand promoter and BMV RNAs-1 and -2 was decreased by more than 90%, and by 60 to 80% when RNA-3 was also present. This trans interference was concentration-dependent, and reduced both (+) and (-) strand progeny accumulation to a similar extent. The appearance of complementary (-) strands indicated that sense interfering transcripts could serve as templates for (-) strand synthesis, and the use of deletion mutants revealed that the observed interference was in part mediated by this template activity. The reproducibility of the protoplast assay used here allows rapid evaluation of interference strategies and comparisons to be made of alternative approaches to engineered resistance. The results presented here suggest that targeting viral (-) strand promoters with sense and antisense transcripts may be an effective method for engineering plant resistance to viral infection.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sense or antisense promoter transcripts reduced viral progeny RNA accumulation by more than 90% with RNAs 1 and 2.

Treatment
either sense or antisense transcripts of the (-) strand promotere0
Interactor
BMVBrome mosaic viruse0pathogen
Outcome
Progeny accumulatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
more than 90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brome mosaic virus
Brome mosaic virus · InteractorNikolai Nikitin, Ekaterina Trifonova, Evgeniy Evtushenko, Mikhail Kirpichnikov, Joseph Atabekov, and Olga Karpova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Progeny accumulation in barley protoplasts transfected with either sense or antisense transcripts of the (-) strand promoter and BMV RNAs-1 and -2 was decreased by more than 90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With RNA 3 present, promoter transcripts reduced viral progeny accumulation by 60 to 80%.

Treatment
either sense or antisense transcripts of the (-) strand promotere0
Interactor
BMVBrome mosaic viruse0pathogen
Outcome
Progeny accumulatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
60 to 80%e0
Qualifier
when RNA-3 was also presente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brome mosaic virus
Brome mosaic virus · InteractorNikolai Nikitin, Ekaterina Trifonova, Evgeniy Evtushenko, Mikhail Kirpichnikov, Joseph Atabekov, and Olga Karpova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Progeny accumulation in barley protoplasts transfected with either sense or antisense transcripts of the (-) strand promoter and BMV RNAs-1 and -2 was decreased by more than 90%, and by 60 to 80% when RNA-3 was also present”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–554 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trans interference depended on transcript concentration.

Treatment
concentration-dependente0
Outcome
trans interferencee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This trans interference was concentration-dependent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley protoplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trans interference reduced positive and negative strand viral progeny similarly.

Outcome
both (+) and (-) strand progeny accumulatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced both (+) and (-) strand progeny accumulation to a similar extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–685 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley protoplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–373 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sense interfering transcripts served as templates for minus-strand synthesis.

Outcome
templates for (-) strand synthesise0
Qualifier
sense interfering transcriptse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The appearance of complementary (-) strands indicated that sense interfering transcripts could serve as templates for (-) strand synthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–825 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley protoplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–373 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deletion mutants indicated template activity partly mediated interference.

Outcome
observed interferencee0
Qualifier
template activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of deletion mutants revealed that the observed interference was in part mediated by this template activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–945 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley protoplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–373 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The protoplast assay was reproducible enough for rapid comparison of resistance strategies.

Outcome
rapid evaluation of interference strategiese0
Comparator
alternative approaches to engineered resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reproducibility of the protoplast assay used here allows rapid evaluation of interference strategies and comparisons to be made of alternative approaches to engineered resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1129 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley protoplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–373 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggested targeting viral minus-strand promoters for engineered plant virus resistance.

Outcome
engineering plant resistance to viral infectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“targeting viral (-) strand promoters with sense and antisense transcripts may be an effective method for engineering plant resistance to viral infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1323 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley protoplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–373 · show in text ↑

loss of function · Brome mosaic virus · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.