Paper · 2008 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Response of irrigated corn silage to seeding rate and row spacing in southern Alberta

B. L. Beres; E. Bremer; C. Van Dasselaar

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field study was conducted to determine if high seeding rates were economically beneficial for irrigated corn silage production in southern Alberta. On average, 84% of seeds produced a plant, with 12% higher plant establishment in narrow (38 cm) than wide (76 cm) rows. Row spacing did not significantly affect yield, but maximum profitability was attained with a lower seeding rate for narrow rows. Whole-plant dry matter yields and net income were increased by 13% when seeding rates were increased from 64 000 to 74 000 seeds ha -1 , but were not significantly affected by seeding rates from 74 000 to 114 000 seeds ha -1 . The ideal seeding rate within this range may vary due to site specific conditions. Forage quality was unaffected by seeding rate. Key words: Corn, Zea mays L., irrigated silage production, quality, plant population, row spacing

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On average, 84% of corn seeds produced a plant.

Outcome
seeds produced a plante0
Value
84%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On average, 84% of seeds produced a plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–191 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant establishment was 12% higher in narrow than wide rows.

Treatment
narrow (38 cm)e0
Outcome
plant establishmente0
Direction
highere0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
wide (76 cm) rowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“12% higher plant establishment in narrow (38 cm) than wide (76 cm) rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–269 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing did not significantly affect yield.

Treatment
Row spacinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Row spacing did not significantly affect yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–317 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum profitability occurred at a lower seeding rate for narrow rows.

Treatment
lower seeding rate for narrow rowse0
Outcome
profitabilitye0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum profitability was attained with a lower seeding rate for narrow rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–399 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-plant dry matter yields increased by 13% with seeding rate.

Treatment
74 000 seeds ha -1e0
Outcome
Whole-plant dry matter yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13%e0
Comparator
64 000e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-plant dry matter yields and net income were increased by 13% when seeding rates were increased from 64 000 to 74 000 seeds ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–535 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

net income increased by 13% with seeding rate.

Treatment
74 000 seeds ha -1e0
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13%e0
Comparator
64 000e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-plant dry matter yields and net income were increased by 13% when seeding rates were increased from 64 000 to 74 000 seeds ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–535 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seeding rates did not significantly affect dry matter yield or net income.

Treatment
seeding rates from 74 000 to 114 000 seeds ha -1e0
Outcome
Whole-plant dry matter yields and net incomee0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-plant dry matter yields and net income were increased by 13% when seeding rates were increased from 64 000 to 74 000 seeds ha -1 , but were not significantly affected by seeding rates from 74 000 to 114 000 seeds ha -1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–627 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding rate did not affect forage quality.

Treatment
seeding ratee0
Outcome
Forage qualitye0
Direction
unaffectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Forage quality was unaffected by seeding rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

138 papers in the same direction as this paper · 519 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

654 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.