Paper · 1977 · Pesticide Science

The basis of selectivity of 4‐(2, 6‐dichlorobenzyloxymethyl)‐4‐ethyl‐2, 2‐dimethyl‐1, 3‐dioxolan (WL 29, 226), a new pre‐emergence herbicide for use in cereals

Brian Jeffcoat

20
claims
33
verbatim quotes
4
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A series of pot experiments were undertaken to assess the selectivity of the pre‐emergence herbicide 4‐(2, 6‐dichlorobenzyloxymethyl)‐4‐ethyl‐2, 2, ‐dimethyl‐1, 3‐dioxolan (WL 29,226) against a number of annual weeds in wheat. When applied at dose rates of 0.5–2 kg/ha it gave good control of a number of annual monocotyledonous weeds, including Alopecurus myosuroides (blackgrass), without any adverse effects on the crop. WL 29,226 is relatively immobile in soil, remaining at the soil surface and thus favouring uptake via the emerging shoot. Since WL 29,226 is transported predominantly via the xylem, to reach its site of action in the regions of cell division, and hence to be effective, the compound has to penetrate the shoot either at or below the stem apex. The roots are inhibited only when these come into direct contact with the compound. Selectivity of the herbicide is dependent upon the relative anatomical positions of the stem apices of the weeds and the crop with respect to the soil surface. Mesocotyl elongation in many of the weed species was such that the meristematic tissue was raised to the soil surface and into contact with the compound during the emergence of the shoot. In contrast, the stem apex of wheat remained some distance below the soil surface until considerably later, by which time the leaf sheaths offered protection to the meristematic tissue from direct contact with the herbicide. Selectivity is further enhanced in the field as a result of both the depth of planting for wheat and the tendency of many annual weed species to germinate more readily when near the soil surface. Tolerance of the wheat is lost where it germinates in direct contact with the herbicide, due to the lack of any biochemical selectivity. Under field conditions WL 29,226 gives good control of many dicotyledonous species. In pot experiments, however, these exhibit some tolerance to the compound. Radio‐tracer studies indicate that the tolerance shown by the shoots of these plants is due to limited transport of the herbicide from the shoot to its site of action at the apex. This suggests that control of broad‐leaved weeds occurs predominantly through an inhibition of root growth. However, in species such as sugar‐beet, soyabean and cotton a rapid rate of root elongation confers increased tolerance to the compound. Availability of WL 29,226 for uptake by young seedlings is favoured by soil moisture. Low temperatures further improve performance by reducing the rate of shoot emergence and hence prolonging contact with the compound at the most sensitive stage of growth. After emergence uptake of the compound via the shoot becomes a less efficient mode of entry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WL 29,226 at 0.5–2 kg/ha controlled annual monocot weeds including Alopecurus myosuroides.

Treatment
0.5–2 kg/hae0
Interactor
Alopecurus myosuroidesAlopecurus myosuroidese0weed
Outcome
good control of a number of annual monocotyledonous weedse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alopecurus myosuroides
Alopecurus myosuroides · InteractorOliver Macdonald Maccheek · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applied at dose rates of 0.5–2 kg/ha it gave good control of a number of annual monocotyledonous weeds, including Alopecurus myosuroides (blackgrass), without any adverse effects on the crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–432 · show in text ↑
t0

“against a number of annual weeds in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–235 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment caused no adverse crop effects at 0.5–2 kg/ha.

Treatment
0.5–2 kg/hae0
Outcome
without any adverse effects on the crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applied at dose rates of 0.5–2 kg/ha it gave good control of a number of annual monocotyledonous weeds, including Alopecurus myosuroides (blackgrass), without any adverse effects on the crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–432 · show in text ↑
t0

“against a number of annual weeds in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–235 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WL 29,226 remained at the soil surface and favored emerging-shoot uptake.

Treatment
WL 29,226e0
Outcome
uptake via the emerging shoote0
Qualifier
remaining at the soil surfacee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WL 29,226 is relatively immobile in soil, remaining at the soil surface and thus favouring uptake via the emerging shoot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“against a number of annual weeds in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–235 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide was transported predominantly through xylem toward dividing tissue.

Organ / stage
shoote0
Treatment
WL 29,226e0
Outcome
transported predominantly via the xyleme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Since WL 29,226 is transported predominantly via the xylem, to reach its site of action in the regions of cell division, and hence to be effective, the compound has to penetrate the shoot either at or below the stem apex.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“against a number of annual weeds in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots were inhibited only on direct contact with the compound.

Treatment
the compounde0
Outcome
roots are inhibitede0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
direct contacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The roots are inhibited only when these come into direct contact with the compound.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“against a number of annual weeds in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–235 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem-apex position relative to the soil surface determined crop-weed selectivity.

Organ / stage
stem apicese0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
Selectivity of the herbicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Selectivity of the herbicide is dependent upon the relative anatomical positions of the stem apices of the weeds and the crop with respect to the soil surface.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“against a number of annual weeds in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–235 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed mesocotyl elongation brought meristems to the soil surface and herbicide during emergence.

Taxon
weed speciese0
Organ / stage
Mesocotyle0
Treatment
compounde0
Outcome
meristematic tissue was raised to the soil surfacee0

Verbatim

e0

“Mesocotyl elongation in many of the weed species was such that the meristematic tissue was raised to the soil surface and into contact with the compound during the emergence of the shoot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1208 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat stem apices remained deeper until leaf sheaths protected the meristem.

Organ / stage
stem apexe0
Treatment
herbicidee0
Outcome
leaf sheaths offered protectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, the stem apex of wheat remained some distance below the soil surface until considerably later, by which time the leaf sheaths offered protection to the meristematic tissue from direct contact with the herbicide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1433 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting depth and near-surface weed germination enhanced herbicide selectivity in the field.

Interactor
annual weed speciese0weed
Outcome
Selectivity is further enhancede0
Qualifier
depth of planting for wheate0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Selectivity is further enhanced in the field as a result of both the depth of planting for wheat and the tendency of many annual weed species to germinate more readily when near the soil surface.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat lost tolerance when it germinated in direct contact with the herbicide.

Treatment
direct contact with the herbicidee0
Outcome
Tolerance of the wheate0
Direction
loste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tolerance of the wheat is lost where it germinates in direct contact with the herbicide, due to the lack of any biochemical selectivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WL 29,226 controlled many dicot weeds under field conditions.

Treatment
WL 29,226e0
Interactor
dicotyledonous speciese0weed
Outcome
good control of many dicotyledonous speciese0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under field conditions WL 29,226 gives good control of many dicotyledonous species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1767–1850 · show in text ↑
t0

“against a number of annual weeds in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–235 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicot weeds displayed some tolerance in pot experiments.

Interactor
thesee0weed
Outcome
some tolerance to the compounde0
Setting
pot experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In pot experiments, however, these exhibit some tolerance to the compound.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1851–1925 · show in text ↑
t0

“against a number of annual weeds in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–235 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limited shoot transport to the apex explained dicot shoot tolerance.

Interactor
these plantse0weed
Outcome
tolerance shown by the shootse0
Qualifier
limited transport of the herbicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Radio‐tracer studies indicate that the tolerance shown by the shoots of these plants is due to limited transport of the herbicide from the shoot to its site of action at the apex.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1926–2105 · show in text ↑
t0

“against a number of annual weeds in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–235 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadleaf weed control appeared to occur mainly through root-growth inhibition.

Interactor
broad‐leaved weedse0weed
Outcome
control of broad‐leaved weedse0
Qualifier
inhibition of root growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This suggests that control of broad‐leaved weeds occurs predominantly through an inhibition of root growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2106–2213 · show in text ↑
t0

“against a number of annual weeds in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–235 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapid root elongation increased herbicide tolerance in sugar-beet.

Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
compounde0
Outcome
tolerance to the compounde0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, in species such as sugar‐beet, soyabean and cotton a rapid rate of root elongation confers increased tolerance to the compound.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2214–2350 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapid root elongation increased herbicide tolerance in soyabean.

Taxon
soyabeane0
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
compounde0
Outcome
tolerance to the compounde0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“However, in species such as sugar‐beet, soyabean and cotton a rapid rate of root elongation confers increased tolerance to the compound.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2214–2350 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapid root elongation increased herbicide tolerance in cotton.

Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
compounde0
Outcome
tolerance to the compounde0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, in species such as sugar‐beet, soyabean and cotton a rapid rate of root elongation confers increased tolerance to the compound.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2214–2350 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture favored availability of WL 29,226 to seedlings.

Treatment
soil moisturee0
Outcome
Availability of WL 29,226 for uptake by young seedlingse0
Direction
favourede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Availability of WL 29,226 for uptake by young seedlings is favoured by soil moisture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2351–2436 · show in text ↑
t0

“against a number of annual weeds in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–235 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature improved herbicide performance by slowing shoot emergence and prolonging exposure.

Treatment
Low temperaturese0
Outcome
improve performancee0
Qualifier
reducing the rate of shoot emergencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low temperatures further improve performance by reducing the rate of shoot emergence and hence prolonging contact with the compound at the most sensitive stage of growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2437–2607 · show in text ↑
t0

“against a number of annual weeds in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–235 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After emergence, shoot uptake became less efficient.

Organ / stage
After emergencee0
Outcome
uptake of the compound via the shoote0
Direction
less efficiente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After emergence uptake of the compound via the shoot becomes a less efficient mode of entry.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2608–2700 · show in text ↑
t0

“against a number of annual weeds in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–235 · show in text ↑

herbicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 18 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.