Paper · 2010 · Journal of Clinical Oncology

The effect of alternate furrow irrigation under different nutritional element supplies on some agronomic traits and seed qualitative parameters in corn (Zea mays L.)

Mohammad Nasri; M Khalatbari; Hossein Aliabadi Farahani

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A new irrigation method under different nutritional element supplies for maize production was designed and tested for some agronomic traits and seed qualitative parameters with a split-plot field experiment. Irrigation was applied through furrows in three ways as the main plots: alternate furrow irrigation (AFI), fixed furrow irrigation (FFI), and conventional furrow irrigation (CFI). AFI means that one of the two neighboring furrows was alternately irrigated during consecutive watering. FFI means that irrigation was fixed to one of the two neighboring furrows. CFI was the conventional way where every furrow was irrigated during each watering. Each irrigation method was further divided into five sub-treatments with different fertilizer combinations: (1) P+N (control) (2) P+N+K (3) P+N+K+Zn (4) P+N+K+Zn+B (5) P+N+K+Zn+B+Fe. The results indicate that water stress effects caused by furrow irrigation on yield may be alleviated by more frequent irrigation intervals. We concluded that AFI is a way to save water in arid areas where maize production relies heavily on repeated irrigation. Fertilized combinations influenced dry matter partitioning to seed filling. Thus, sufficient both macro and micro nutritional elements increased harvest index which was mostly due to more number of seeds per row than higher individual grain weight. Complete fertilizer combination increased total above ground biomass through more radiation use efficiency and by increasing leaf area. In order to utilize the water sources efficiently and increase corn production under limited water supply, we propose the use of circular irrigation care along with instance, K, Zn, B and Fe fertilizer. Key words: Alternate furrow irrigation, corn (Zea mays L.), fertilizer combination,water stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress effects of furrow irrigation on maize yield may be alleviated by more frequent irrigation intervals.

Treatment
furrow irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
alleviatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress effects caused by furrow irrigation on yield may be alleviated by more frequent irrigation intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–151 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that alternate furrow irrigation saves water in arid areas where maize production depends heavily on repeated irrigation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AFIe0
Outcome
save watere0
Setting
arid arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We concluded that AFI is a way to save water in arid areas where maize production relies heavily on repeated irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer combinations influenced dry matter partitioning to seed filling in corn.

Treatment
Fertilized combinationse0
Outcome
dry matter partitioning to seed fillinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilized combinations influenced dry matter partitioning to seed filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sufficient macro and micro nutritional elements increased harvest index in corn, mostly through more seeds per row rather than higher individual grain weight.

Treatment
sufficient both macro and micro nutritional elementse0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
mostly due to more number of seeds per row than higher individual grain weighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sufficient both macro and micro nutritional elements increased harvest index which was mostly due to more number of seeds per row than higher individual grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The complete fertilizer combination increased total above ground biomass in corn through more radiation use efficiency and increased leaf area.

Treatment
Complete fertilizer combinatione0
Outcome
total above ground biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
through more radiation use efficiency and by increasing leaf areae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Complete fertilizer combination increased total above ground biomass through more radiation use efficiency and by increasing leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1480 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–151 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose circular irrigation together with K, Zn, B and Fe fertilizer to raise corn production under limited water supply.

Treatment
circular irrigation care along with instance, K, Zn, B and Fe fertilizere0
Outcome
increase corn production under limited water supplye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase corn production under limited water supply, we propose the use of circular irrigation care along with instance, K, Zn, B and Fe fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1683 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.