Paper · 1978 · Physiologia Plantarum

Interactions between Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation, Combined‐N Application, and Photosynthesis in Pisum sativum

GABOR J. BETHLENFALVAY; DONALD A. PHILLIPS

8
claims
24
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effect of photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) on nitrogen utilization was determined in peas (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) inoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum and treated with nutrient solutions containing no combined nitrogen, 16 m M NO 3 − , or 16 m M NH 4 + . Plants were grown under controlled conditions at three PPFD values ranging from severely limiting to nearly saturating. Carboxylation efficiencies and CO 2 ‐exchange rates were highest in the N 2 ‐fixing plants and lowest in plants supplied with NH 4 + , and they generally increased with increasing PPFD. Photoefficiencies increased with PPFD but did not differ appreciably with the form of nitrogen applied. Nitrogen fixation, calculated from C 2 H 2 ‐reduction and H 2 ‐evolution data, was inhibited more by NH 4 + than by NO 3 − application. Inhibition was counteracted by increasing PPFD. Percentage nitrogen decreased with increasing PPFD in plants treated with combined nitrogen and increased in the plants dependent on N 2 fixation. The data reveal that photosynthetic efficiency and the capacity to fix N 2 in peas are functions of PPFD and the availability of combined nitrogen and that these two factors are interrelated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2-fixing peas had the highest carboxylation efficiency and CO2 exchange, while ammonium-fed plants had the lowest.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume1symbiont
Outcome
Carboxylation efficiencies and CO 2 ‐exchange ratese0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
plants supplied with NH 4 +e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carboxylation efficiencies and CO 2 ‐exchange rates were highest in the N 2 ‐fixing plants and lowest in plants supplied with NH 4 + , and they generally increased with increasing PPFD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–591 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“peas (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) inoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–181 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carboxylation efficiency and CO2 exchange generally increased with PPFD.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
increasing PPFDe0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume1symbiont
Outcome
Carboxylation efficiencies and CO 2 ‐exchange ratese0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carboxylation efficiencies and CO 2 ‐exchange rates were highest in the N 2 ‐fixing plants and lowest in plants supplied with NH 4 + , and they generally increased with increasing PPFD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–591 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“peas (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) inoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–181 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photoefficiency increased with PPFD.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
PPFDe0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume1symbiont
Outcome
Photoefficienciese0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photoefficiencies increased with PPFD but did not differ appreciably with the form of nitrogen applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–695 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“peas (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) inoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photoefficiency did not differ appreciably among nitrogen forms.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
form of nitrogen appliede0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume1symbiont
Outcome
Photoefficienciese0
Direction
did not differ appreciablye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photoefficiencies increased with PPFD but did not differ appreciably with the form of nitrogen applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–695 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“peas (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) inoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium inhibited nitrogen fixation more than nitrate application.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
NH 4 +e0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume1symbiont
Outcome
Nitrogen fixatione0
Direction
inhibited moree0
Comparator
NO 3 − applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fixation, calculated from C 2 H 2 ‐reduction and H 2 ‐evolution data, was inhibited more by NH 4 + than by NO 3 − application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“peas (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) inoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing PPFD counteracted inhibition of nitrogen fixation.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
increasing PPFDe0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume1symbiont
Outcome
Inhibitione0
Direction
counteractede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inhibition was counteracted by increasing PPFD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“peas (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) inoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–181 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen percentage decreased with PPFD in combined-nitrogen-fed peas.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
increasing PPFDe0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume1symbiont
Outcome
Percentage nitrogene0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
plants treated with combined nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage nitrogen decreased with increasing PPFD in plants treated with combined nitrogen and increased in the plants dependent on N 2 fixation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“peas (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) inoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–181 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen percentage increased with PPFD in nitrogen-fixing peas.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
increasing PPFDe0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume1symbiont
Outcome
Percentage nitrogene0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
plants dependent on N 2 fixatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage nitrogen decreased with increasing PPFD in plants treated with combined nitrogen and increased in the plants dependent on N 2 fixation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“peas (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) inoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–181 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · Rhizobium leguminosarum · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

light · Rhizobium leguminosarum · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.