Paper · 1998 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Effects of preceding maize (Zea mays) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in sole cropping and intercropping on growth, yield and nitrogen requirement of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)

F. O. OLASANTAN

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted on Alfisols in Nigeria between 1991 and 1993 to determine the residual effect of maize ( Zea mays ) and cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata ) on the growth, pod yield and N response of a succeeding okra ( Abelmoschus esculentus ) crop. Cowpea and maize were grown alone with 30 and 60 kg/ha of N, P and K, respectively, or intercropped with 60 kg/ha as a basal dressing. The preceding crops had a significant effect on soil nutrient changes, okra growth and yield, and N response of okra. Cowpea increased the N, P and K status of the soil in both sole and mixed stands, compared with sole maize. Leaf area, pod weight and marketable pod yield of okra after sole cowpea or the maize/cowpea intercrop were all significantly higher than after sole maize. Although the application of nitrogen to succeeding okra promoted growth and increased pod yield, this was not accompanied by an increase in the pod yield of okra after sole cowpea or the maize/cowpea treatment beyond 45 kg N/ha. The beneficial effects of the preceding maize/cowpea intercrop on soil fertility, okra pod yield and amounts of N required for okra were partly due to the higher rate of basal nutrients applied as compared to the effects following sole cowpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea increased soil N, P and K status in both sole and mixed stands compared with sole maize

Treatment
Cowpeae4
Outcome
N, P and K status of the soile4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
sole maizee4
Setting
Alfisols in Nigeriae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Cowpea increased the N, P and K status of the soil in both sole and mixed stands, compared with sole maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–619 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field experiments were conducted on Alfisols in Nigeria between 1991 and 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
t0

“nitrogen requirement of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area, pod weight and marketable pod yield of okra after sole cowpea or the maize/cowpea intercrop were significantly higher than after sole maize

Treatment
sole cowpea or the maize/cowpea intercrope5
Outcome
Leaf area, pod weight and marketable pod yielde5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
sole maizee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Leaf area, pod weight and marketable pod yield of okra after sole cowpea or the maize/cowpea intercrop were all significantly higher than after sole maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“nitrogen requirement of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of nitrogen to succeeding okra promoted growth

Treatment
application of nitrogene6
Outcome
growthe6
Direction
promotede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Although the application of nitrogen to succeeding okra promoted growth and increased pod yield, this was not accompanied by an increase in the pod yield of okra after sole cowpea or the maize/cowpea treatment beyond 45 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“nitrogen requirement of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of nitrogen to succeeding okra increased pod yield

Treatment
application of nitrogene6
Outcome
pod yielde6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Although the application of nitrogen to succeeding okra promoted growth and increased pod yield, this was not accompanied by an increase in the pod yield of okra after sole cowpea or the maize/cowpea treatment beyond 45 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“nitrogen requirement of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod yield of okra after sole cowpea or the maize/cowpea intercrop did not increase beyond 45 kg N/ha

Treatment
application of nitrogene6
Outcome
pod yielde6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6
Qualifier
beyond 45 kg N/hae6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Although the application of nitrogen to succeeding okra promoted growth and increased pod yield, this was not accompanied by an increase in the pod yield of okra after sole cowpea or the maize/cowpea treatment beyond 45 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“nitrogen requirement of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–178 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The beneficial effects of the preceding maize/cowpea intercrop on okra are partly due to higher rates of basal nutrients

Outcome
beneficial effectse2
Qualifier
partly due to the higher rate of basal nutrients appliede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The beneficial effects of the preceding maize/cowpea intercrop on soil fertility, okra pod yield and amounts of N required for okra were partly due to the higher rate of basal nutrients applied as compared to the effects following sole cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“nitrogen requirement of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–178 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · quality: postharvest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results differ

82 papers: 79 positive, 3 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

intercropping · quality: postharvest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 46 positive, 2 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.