Paper · 2014 · Sustainable Agriculture Research

Deficit Irrigation of Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf): Effects on Total Dry Matter Production, Light Interception and Radiation Use Efficiency Under Different Nitrogen Rates

Hatem Cheikh M'hamed; Mourad Rezig; Mbarek Ben Naceur

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

On-farm trial was conducted from 2005 to 2008 to test the hypothesis that reduction of total dry matter (TDM) in crops can occur after a decreased radiation use efficiency (RUE) due to shortage of nitrogen and irrigation, we applied three irrigations treatments (D1, D2 and D3) and four nitrogen rates (N1, N2, N3 and N4). Photosynthetic active radiation absorbed or cumulative light interception (PARabs) and RUE of Durum wheat were measured. Results showed that D1N1 treatment recorded the highest LAI, PARabs, TDM and RUE. The maximum LAI was obtained 140 DAS (days after sowing) under treatment D1N2 (6.42) and the lowest LAI at the same phase belonged to treatment D2N4 (3.86). At the harvest, the maximum of TDM was 1487 g m-2 recorded under treatment D1N1. The minimum value obtained was 930 g m-2 under treatment D3N4. Also, PARabs was improved under D1N1 and D1N2 treatments. With reduced N application rates and irrigation doses, PARabs was decreased and the lowest values were observed under D3N4 condition. The RUE, varied from 1.55 g MJ-1 (D1N1) to 1.24 g MJ-1 (D3N4), was affected and decreased under deficit irrigation and low nitrogen conditions. In conclusion, the results of this study seem to show that D1N1 and D1N2 treatments can be beneficial for Durum wheat under field conditions in semi arid zone of Tunisia, for the purpose of improving RUE and maximizing grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The D1N1 treatment gave the highest LAI, absorbed PAR and total dry matter in durum wheat.

Treatment
D1N1e0
Outcome
LAI, PARabs, TDMe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“D1N1 treatment recorded the highest LAI, PARabs, TDM and RUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–524 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The D1N1 treatment gave the highest radiation use efficiency in durum wheat.

Treatment
D1N1e0
Outcome
RUEe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“D1N1 treatment recorded the highest LAI, PARabs, TDM and RUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–524 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum LAI of durum wheat, 6.42, was obtained 140 days after sowing under treatment D1N2.

Treatment
D1N2e0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
6.42e0
Qualifier
140 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum LAI was obtained 140 DAS (days after sowing) under treatment D1N2 (6.42)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–610 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest LAI at the same stage, 3.86, belonged to treatment D2N4.

Treatment
D2N4e0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3.86e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest LAI at the same phase belonged to treatment D2N4 (3.86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest the maximum total dry matter of durum wheat, 1487 g m-2, was recorded under treatment D1N1.

Treatment
D1N1e0
Outcome
TDMe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1487 g m-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the harvest, the maximum of TDM was 1487 g m-2 recorded under treatment D1N1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The minimum total dry matter of durum wheat, 930 g m-2, was obtained under treatment D3N4.

Treatment
D3N4e1
Outcome
TDMe0
Direction
minimume1
Value
930 g m-2e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the harvest, the maximum of TDM was 1487 g m-2 recorded under treatment D1N1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–762 · show in text ↑
e1

“The minimum value obtained was 930 g m-2 under treatment D3N4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Absorbed photosynthetic active radiation was improved under the D1N1 and D1N2 treatments.

Treatment
D1N1 and D1N2e0
Outcome
PARabse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PARabs was improved under D1N1 and D1N2 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With reduced N application rates and irrigation doses PARabs decreased, with the lowest values under D3N4.

Treatment
reduced N application rates and irrigation dosese0
Outcome
PARabse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
lowest values were observed under D3N4 conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With reduced N application rates and irrigation doses, PARabs was decreased and the lowest values were observed under D3N4 condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RUE of durum wheat varied from 1.55 g MJ-1 under D1N1 to 1.24 g MJ-1 under D3N4 and decreased under deficit irrigation and low nitrogen.

Treatment
deficit irrigation and low nitrogen conditionse0
Outcome
RUEe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
1.55 g MJ-1 (D1N1) to 1.24 g MJ-1 (D3N4)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RUE, varied from 1.55 g MJ-1 (D1N1) to 1.24 g MJ-1 (D3N4), was affected and decreased under deficit irrigation and low nitrogen conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that D1N1 and D1N2 can be beneficial for durum wheat under field conditions in the semi-arid zone of Tunisia, improving RUE and maximizing grain yield.

Outcome
improving RUE and maximizing grain yielde0
Setting
semi arid zone of Tunisiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“D1N1 and D1N2 treatments can be beneficial for Durum wheat under field conditions in semi arid zone of Tunisia, for the purpose of improving RUE and maximizing grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.