Paper · 2019 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Differential Regulation of Stomatal Conductance as a Strategy to Cope With Ammonium Fertilizer Under Ambient Versus Elevated CO2

Fernando Torralbo; María Begoña González-Moro; Edurne Baroja-Fernández; et al.

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

While nitrogen (N) derived from ammonium would be energetically less expensive than nitrate-derived N, the use of ammonium-based fertilizer is limited by the potential for toxicity symptoms. Nevertheless, previous studies have shown that exposure to elevated CO2 favors ammonium assimilation in plants. However, little is known about the impact of different forms of N fertilizer on stomatal opening and their consequent effects on CO2 and H2O diffusion in wheat plants exposed to ambient and elevated CO2. In this paper we have examined the response of the photosynthetic machinery of durum wheat (Triticum durum, var. Amilcar) grown with different types of N fertilizer (NO3-, NH4+ and NH4NO3) at 400 versus 700 ppm of CO2. Alongside gas exchange and photochemical parameters, the expression of genes involved in CO2 (PIP1.1 and PIP2.3) and H2O (TIP1) diffusion as well as key C and N primary metabolism enzymes and metabolites were studied. Our results show that at 400 ppm CO2, wheat plants fertilized with ammonium as the N source had oxidative stress symptoms and a strong reduction in stomatal conductance, which negatively affected photosynthetic rates. The higher levels of PIP1.1 and PIP 2.3 expression in ammonium-fertilized plants at 400 ppm CO2 might reflect the need to overcome limitations to the CO2 supply to chloroplasts due to restrictions in stomatal conductance. This stomatal limitation might be associated with a strategy to reduce ammonium transport toward leaves. On the other hand, ammonium-fertilized plants at elevated CO2 did not show stress symptoms and no differences were detected in stomatal opening or water use efficiency (WUE). Moreover, similar gene expression of the aquaporins TIP1, PIP1.1 and PIP2.3 in ammonium-fertilized plants grown at 700 ppm compared to nitrate- and ammonium nitrate-plants would suggest that an adjustment in CO2 and H2O diffusion is not required. Therefore, in the absence of a stress context triggered by elevated CO2, ammonium- and ammonium nitrate-fertilized plants were able to increase their photosynthetic rates, which was translated eventually into higher leaf protein content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium fertilization at 400 ppm CO2 produced oxidative stress symptoms.

Treatment
ammonium as the N sourcee0
Outcome
oxidative stress symptomse0
Setting
400 ppm CO2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 400 ppm CO2, wheat plants fertilized with ammonium as the N source had oxidative stress symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium fertilization at 400 ppm CO2 strongly reduced stomatal conductance.

Treatment
ammonium as the N sourcee0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
reductione0
Setting
400 ppm CO2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 400 ppm CO2, wheat plants fertilized with ammonium as the N source had oxidative stress symptoms and a strong reduction in stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1112 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced stomatal conductance negatively affected photosynthetic rates.

Outcome
photosynthetic ratese0
Qualifier
reduction in stomatal conductancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a strong reduction in stomatal conductance, which negatively affected photosynthetic rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat (Triticum durum, var. Amilcar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–628 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium fertilization at 400 ppm CO2 was associated with higher PIP1.1 and PIP 2.3 expression.

Treatment
ammonium-fertilizede0
Gene
PIP1.1 and PIP 2.3e0
Outcome
PIP1.1 and PIP 2.3 expressione0
Direction
highere0
Setting
400 ppm CO2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher levels of PIP1.1 and PIP 2.3 expression in ammonium-fertilized plants at 400 ppm CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1257 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat (Triticum durum, var. Amilcar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–628 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher PIP expression might compensate for restricted CO2 delivery to chloroplasts.

Outcome
CO2 supply to chloroplastse0
Qualifier
restrictions in stomatal conductancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“might reflect the need to overcome limitations to the CO2 supply to chloroplasts due to restrictions in stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat (Triticum durum, var. Amilcar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–628 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal limitation might reduce ammonium transport toward leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
ammonium transport toward leavese0
Qualifier
stomatal limitatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This stomatal limitation might be associated with a strategy to reduce ammonium transport toward leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1487 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat (Triticum durum, var. Amilcar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–628 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium-fertilized plants at elevated CO2 showed no stress symptoms.

Treatment
ammonium-fertilizede0
Outcome
stress symptomse0
Setting
elevated CO2e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ammonium-fertilized plants at elevated CO2 did not show stress symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1579 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat (Triticum durum, var. Amilcar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–628 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At elevated CO2, ammonium-fertilized plants showed no difference in stomatal opening.

Treatment
ammonium-fertilizede0
Outcome
stomatal openinge0
Direction
no differencese0
Setting
elevated CO2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ammonium-fertilized plants at elevated CO2 did not show stress symptoms and no differences were detected in stomatal opening or water use efficiency (WUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1662 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat (Triticum durum, var. Amilcar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–628 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At elevated CO2, ammonium-fertilized plants showed no difference in water use efficiency.

Treatment
ammonium-fertilizede0
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
no differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ammonium-fertilized plants at elevated CO2 did not show stress symptoms and no differences were detected in stomatal opening or water use efficiency (WUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1662 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat (Triticum durum, var. Amilcar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–628 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 700 ppm CO2, aquaporin gene expression was similar under ammonium, nitrate, and ammonium nitrate fertilization.

Treatment
ammonium-fertilizede0
Gene
TIP1, PIP1.1 and PIP2.3e0
Outcome
gene expressione0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
nitrate- and ammonium nitrate-plantse0
Setting
700 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“similar gene expression of the aquaporins TIP1, PIP1.1 and PIP2.3 in ammonium-fertilized plants grown at 700 ppm compared to nitrate- and ammonium nitrate-plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1835 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat (Triticum durum, var. Amilcar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–628 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium and ammonium nitrate fertilization increased photosynthetic rates under elevated CO2.

Treatment
ammonium- and ammonium nitrate-fertilizede0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ammonium- and ammonium nitrate-fertilized plants were able to increase their photosynthetic rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1984–2081 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat (Triticum durum, var. Amilcar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–628 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased photosynthesis under elevated CO2 translated into higher leaf protein content.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
leaf protein contente0
Qualifier
photosynthetic ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase their photosynthetic rates, which was translated eventually into higher leaf protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2046–2147 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat (Triticum durum, var. Amilcar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–628 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: water · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 26 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.