Paper · 2000 · Physiologia Plantarum

Silverleaf whitefly stress impairs sugar export from cotton source leaves

Tong‐Bao Lin; Shmuel Wolf; Amnon Schwartz; et al.

5
claims
19
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Silverleaf whitefly (SLW), Bemisia argentifolii Bellows and Perring, is one of the most noxious pests of numerous field and vegetable crops, causing billions of dollars worth of damage throughout the world. SLW is a phloem feeder whose feeding is likely to interfere with phloem transport. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that SLW infestation impairs carbohydrate export from source leaves, and consequently increases their carbohydrate content. The youngest fully expanded leaves of cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L., cv. Siv'on), grown under SLW‐infested and noninfested conditions, were characterized for their diurnal changes in carbohydrate content and photoassimilate export. SLW infestation induced a considerable reduction in net photosynthetic rate (P n ), coupled with increased sucrose, glucose and fructose and decreased starch concentrations. Export rate was determined after CO 2 pulse‐labeling both by in situ monitoring of leaf radioactivity and by analyzing the content and radioactivity of the major carbon metabolites. Radioactive counting indicated a lower rate of C efflux for the infested plants. A similar trend was found for the specific activities of sucrose and the three soluble sugars combined (sucrose, glucose and fructose). A single exponential decay function with asymptote was fitted to the above efflux curves. All the calculated exponential coefficients demonstrated lower export rates after SLW injury. These results indicate that SLW impairs photoassimilate export, suggesting possible down‐regulation of P n due to increased foliar soluble sugar contents.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SLW infestation reduced the net photosynthetic rate of cotton leaves compared with noninfested plants.

Treatment
SLW infestatione1
Interactor
SLWe1pest
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee1
Direction
reductione1
Comparator
noninfestede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Silverleaf whitefly stress impairs sugar export from cotton source leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“SLW infestation induced a considerable reduction in net photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–771 · show in text ↑
e3

“noninfested conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SLW infestation increased sucrose, glucose and fructose contents in cotton source leaves compared with noninfested plants.

Treatment
SLW infestatione1
Interactor
SLWe1pest
Outcome
sucrose, glucose and fructosee2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
noninfestede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Silverleaf whitefly stress impairs sugar export from cotton source leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“SLW infestation induced a considerable reduction in net photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–771 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased sucrose, glucose and fructose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–832 · show in text ↑
e3

“noninfested conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SLW infestation decreased starch concentrations in cotton source leaves compared with noninfested plants.

Treatment
SLW infestatione1
Interactor
SLWe1pest
Outcome
starch concentrationse4
Direction
decreasede4
Comparator
noninfestede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Silverleaf whitefly stress impairs sugar export from cotton source leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“SLW infestation induced a considerable reduction in net photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–771 · show in text ↑
e3

“noninfested conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–597 · show in text ↑
e4

“decreased starch concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SLW infestation lowered the rate of C efflux from cotton source leaves, i.e. photoassimilate export, compared with noninfested plants.

Treatment
SLW infestatione1
Interactor
SLWe1pest
Outcome
rate of C effluxe5
Direction
lowere5
Comparator
noninfestede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Silverleaf whitefly stress impairs sugar export from cotton source leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“SLW infestation induced a considerable reduction in net photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–771 · show in text ↑
e3

“noninfested conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–597 · show in text ↑
e5

“Radioactive counting indicated a lower rate of C efflux for the infested plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific activities of sucrose and the three soluble sugars combined showed a similar trend, i.e. lower, after SLW infestation.

Treatment
SLW infestatione1
Interactor
SLWe1pest
Outcome
specific activities of sucrose and the three soluble sugars combinede6
Direction
lowerinferrede6
Comparator
noninfestede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Silverleaf whitefly stress impairs sugar export from cotton source leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“SLW infestation induced a considerable reduction in net photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–771 · show in text ↑
e3

“noninfested conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–597 · show in text ↑
e6

“A similar trend was found for the specific activities of sucrose and the three soluble sugars combined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1235 · show in text ↑

Bemisia argentifolii · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

infection · physiology: osmolytes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

infection · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

infection · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.