Paper · 1999 · Crop Science

Photosynthesis and Productivity of Cotton under Silverleaf Whitefly Stress

Tong‐Bao Lin; Amnon Schwartz; Yehoshua Saranga

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
25
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The silverleaf whitefly (SLW), Bemisia argentifolii (Bellows and Perring), has been a severe pest of numerous field and vegetable crops for many years. Nevertheless, little has been reported on the complex interactions between SLW and its host plants. This study was aimed at investigating the effects of SLW on cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) photosynthesis and productivity under various irrigation and N fertilization regimes. Cotton plants (cv. Siv'on) were examined during an entire growing season in two factorial‐designed screenhouse experiments consisting of two irrigation regimes (I) × two N application rates × two SLW levels (noninfested vs. infested). Buildup of the SLW population was markedly higher on N‐fertilized plants than on N‐deficient plants. Seed cotton yield was reduced by SLW in festation under all combinations of I × N treatments by about 40%. Yield reduction (noninfested minus infested) was significantly correlated with the number of SLW adults on the maximally infested leaf at peak flowering ( r 2 = 0.94, P < 0.05 in 1995; r 2 = 0.91, P < 0.05 in 1996). Photosynthetic rate decreased 50% at about 60 d after SLW introduction. The relative photosynthetic rate (infested/noninfested) was significantly correlated with SLW adult density on the maximally infested leaf ( r 2 = 0.72, P < 0.001 in 1995; r 2 = 0.53, P < 0.01 in 1996). The reduced photosynthetic rate was associated with reductions in chlorophyll variable fluorescence (Fv/Fm) and fluorescence yield. No substantial changes were found in stomatal conductance, intercellular CO 2 concentration, and leaf chlorophyll content. These findings indicate that SLW infestation impairs, either directly or indirectly, the photochemical reaction of the photosynthetic system in cotton plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whitefly population buildup was greater on N-fertilized cotton plants.

Treatment
N‐fertilizede0
Interactor
Silverleaf WhiteflyBemisia argentifoliit0pest
Outcome
SLW populatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
N‐deficiente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia argentifolii
Bemisia argentifolii · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryScott Bauer, USDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Buildup of the SLW population was markedly higher on N‐fertilized plants than on N‐deficient plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton under Silverleaf Whitefly Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whitefly infestation reduced seed cotton yield by about 40% across irrigation and nitrogen combinations.

Treatment
SLW in festatione0
Interactor
SLWe0pestt0
Outcome
Seed cotton yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 40%e0
Qualifier
under all combinations of I × N treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed cotton yield was reduced by SLW in festation under all combinations of I × N treatments by about 40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton under Silverleaf Whitefly Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield reduction correlated significantly with whitefly adult count at peak flowering.

Organ / stage
maximally infested leaf at peak floweringe0
Interactor
SLWe0pestt0
Outcome
Yield reductione0
Value
r 2 = 0.94e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield reduction (noninfested minus infested) was significantly correlated with the number of SLW adults on the maximally infested leaf at peak flowering ( r 2 = 0.94, P < 0.05 in 1995; r 2 = 0.91, P < 0.05 in 1996)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton under Silverleaf Whitefly Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whitefly infestation decreased cotton photosynthetic rate by 50% about 60 days after introduction.

Treatment
SLW introductione0
Interactor
SLWe0pestt0
Outcome
Photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
about 60 d after SLW introductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic rate decreased 50% at about 60 d after SLW introduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton under Silverleaf Whitefly Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative photosynthetic rate correlated significantly with whitefly adult density.

Interactor
SLWe0pestt0
Outcome
relative photosynthetic ratee0
Value
r 2 = 0.72e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative photosynthetic rate (infested/noninfested) was significantly correlated with SLW adult density on the maximally infested leaf ( r 2 = 0.72, P < 0.001 in 1995; r 2 = 0.53, P < 0.01 in 1996)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton under Silverleaf Whitefly Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced photosynthesis was associated with lower variable fluorescence and fluorescence yield.

Organ / stage
cottont0
Interactor
Silverleaf WhiteflyBemisia argentifoliit0pest
Outcome
chlorophyll variable fluorescence (Fv/Fm) and fluorescence yielde0
Direction
reductionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia argentifolii
Bemisia argentifolii · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryScott Bauer, USDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduced photosynthetic rate was associated with reductions in chlorophyll variable fluorescence (Fv/Fm) and fluorescence yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton under Silverleaf Whitefly Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance, intercellular CO2 concentration and leaf chlorophyll content showed no substantial changes.

Interactor
Silverleaf WhiteflyBemisia argentifoliit0pest
Outcome
stomatal conductance, intercellular CO 2 concentration, and leaf chlorophyll contente0
Direction
No substantial changese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia argentifolii
Bemisia argentifolii · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryScott Bauer, USDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No substantial changes were found in stomatal conductance, intercellular CO 2 concentration, and leaf chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton under Silverleaf Whitefly Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–74 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer whitefly infestation impairs the photochemical reaction in cotton.

Treatment
SLW infestatione0
Interactor
SLWe0pestt0
Outcome
photochemical reaction of the photosynthetic systeme0
Qualifier
either directly or indirectlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SLW infestation impairs, either directly or indirectly, the photochemical reaction of the photosynthetic system in cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1776 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton under Silverleaf Whitefly Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–74 · show in text ↑

Bemisia argentifolii · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · Bemisia argentifolii · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.