Paper · 2001 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Changes of glutathione contents in cotton seedlings infected by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. vasinfectum and its relationship to disease resistance

Song Fengming; G. X. uChun; Zheng Zhong

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Changes in contents of reduced glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) in leaves and stems/roots of cotton seedlings after infection by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum (Fov) and pretreatment with trifluralin at 2 μg/g soil were studied. GSH and GSSG contents in leaves and stems/roots of cotton seedlings were increased after infection by Fov. GSH level in leaves was mercased rapidly at the earlier stage of infection and decreased latter whereas GSH level in stems/roots was increased progressively. Presowing treatment with trifluralin, which enhanced the resistance to Fusarium wilt, resulted in increased levels of GSH and GSSG both in leaves and stems/roots of cotton seedlings. How ever, no significant difference in increases of GSH and GSSG levels between cotton seedlings of resistant cultivar (cv Zhongmian 12) and susceptible cultivar (cv 6037) and between trifluralin-treated seedlings and untreated one were observed. Therefore it's unlikely that GSH might be related to the resistance and to the trifluralin-induced resistance of cotton seedlings to Fusarium wilt.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fov infection increased GSH and GSSG in cotton leaves and stems/roots.

Taxon
cotton seedlingsGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
infection by Fove0
Interactor
Fove0pathogen
Outcome
GSH and GSSG contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GSH and GSSG contents in leaves and stems/roots of cotton seedlings were increased after infection by Fov”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–358 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf GSH increased early after infection and declined later.

Outcome
GSH level in leavese0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GSH level in leaves was mercased rapidly at the earlier stage of infection and decreased latter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–455 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem/root GSH rose progressively after infection.

Outcome
GSH level in stems/rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GSH level in stems/roots was increased progressively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–516 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presowing trifluralin enhanced resistance to Fusarium wilt.

Treatment
Presowing treatment with trifluraline0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
resistance to Fusarium wilte0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Presowing treatment with trifluralin, which enhanced the resistance to Fusarium wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presowing trifluralin raised GSH and GSSG in cotton leaves and stems/roots.

Taxon
cotton seedlingsGossypium hirsutume0
Outcome
levels of GSH and GSSGe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulted in increased levels of GSH and GSSG both in leaves and stems/roots of cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–699 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GSH and GSSG increases did not differ significantly between resistant and susceptible cultivars.

Taxon
cotton seedlingsGossypium hirsutume0
Outcome
increases of GSH and GSSG levelse0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
susceptible cultivar (cv 6037)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant difference in increases of GSH and GSSG levels between cotton seedlings of resistant cultivar (cv Zhongmian 12) and susceptible cultivar (cv 6037)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GSH and GSSG increases did not differ significantly between trifluralin-treated and untreated seedlings.

Taxon
cotton seedlingsGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
trifluralin-treated seedlingse0
Outcome
increases of GSH and GSSG levelse0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
untreated onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant difference in increases of GSH and GSSG levels between cotton seedlings of resistant cultivar (cv Zhongmian 12) and susceptible cultivar (cv 6037) and between trifluralin-treated seedlings and untreated one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–932 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged GSH unlikely to explain resistance or trifluralin-induced resistance.

Taxon
cotton seedlingsGossypium hirsutume0
Outcome
GSH might be related to the resistance and to the trifluralin-induced resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it's unlikely that GSH might be related to the resistance and to the trifluralin-induced resistance of cotton seedlings to Fusarium wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1094 · show in text ↑

trifluralin · Fusarium · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

infection · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.