Paper · 2008 · Agricultural and Food Science

Winter triticale yield formation and quality affected by N rate, timing and splitting

M. ALARU; Ü. LAUR; V. EREMEEV

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted to study the effects different nitrogen (N) quantities (N0–120 kg ha-1) and application regimes (N applied at stages of tillering BBCH28–30 and flag leaf sheath opening BBCH47) on (i) the formation of winter triticale above ground biomass (AGB), (ii) the grain yield (iii) the yield quality, and also (iiii) to find more suitable N fertilizing regimes for winter triticale depending on their utilization. Winter rye and winter wheat were used as reference crops. The efficiency of applying all N at the tillering stage (N100%+N0) was the highest for the grain yield of triticale. N application at development stage of plants BBCH47 increased the grain protein concentration significantly and the increase by 1 kg N was the highest in triticale cultivars. More stabile grain yield was produced by triticales in application regime N+N. N splitting did not influence significantly either the duration of the grain-filling period or the dry matter accumulation rate of triticale. N splitting affected Hagberg falling number (HFN) indirectly through the effect on the grain yield formation and grain protein concentration. HFN was positively correlated with the grain yield and negatively with the grain protein concentration. The suitable N regimes are: 1) triticale as the energy plant – N60+N0 – N applied at the tillering stage of plants and suitable N norm is not more than 60 kg N ha-1; 2) triticale as a feed or food – N60+N60 – High grain yield, protein and lysine concentration level are assured then.;

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying all N at tillering had the highest efficiency for triticale grain yield.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
applying all N at the tillering stage (N100%+N0)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficiency of applying all N at the tillering stage (N100%+N0) was the highest for the grain yield of triticale.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N application at BBCH47 significantly increased triticale grain protein concentration.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
N application at development stage of plants BBCH47e0
Outcome
grain protein concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N application at development stage of plants BBCH47 increased the grain protein concentration significantly and the increase by 1 kg N was the highest in triticale cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein gain per kilogram of applied N was highest in triticale cultivars.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Outcome
increase by 1 kg Ne0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase by 1 kg N was the highest in triticale cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split N application produced more stable triticale grain yield.

Taxon
triticales×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
application regime N+Ne0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
More stabilee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More stabile grain yield was produced by triticales in application regime N+N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N splitting did not significantly influence triticale grain-filling duration or dry matter accumulation rate.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
N splittinge0
Outcome
duration of the grain-filling period or the dry matter accumulation ratee0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N splitting did not influence significantly either the duration of the grain-filling period or the dry matter accumulation rate of triticale.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1010 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N splitting affected Hagberg falling number indirectly through grain yield and protein concentration.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
N splittinge0
Outcome
Hagberg falling number (HFN)e0
Qualifier
through the effect on the grain yield formation and grain protein concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N splitting affected Hagberg falling number (HFN) indirectly through the effect on the grain yield formation and grain protein concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–16 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hagberg falling number was positively correlated with grain yield.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
HFNe0
Direction
positivelye0
Comparator
grain yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HFN was positively correlated with the grain yield and negatively with the grain protein concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–16 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hagberg falling number was negatively correlated with grain protein concentration.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
HFNe0
Direction
negativelye0
Comparator
grain protein concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HFN was positively correlated with the grain yield and negatively with the grain protein concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–16 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For energy use, the authors recommend N60+N0 and no more than 60 kg N ha-1 at tillering.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Outcome
N60+N0e0
Value
60 kg N ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“triticale as the energy plant – N60+N0 – N applied at the tillering stage of plants and suitable N norm is not more than 60 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1421 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For feed or food, the authors recommend N60+N60 for high yield, protein and lysine.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Outcome
N60+N60e0
Qualifier
High grain yield, protein and lysine concentration levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“triticale as a feed or food – N60+N60 – High grain yield, protein and lysine concentration level are assured then.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1540 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.