Paper · 2004 · Physiologia Plantarum

Analysis of differences in photosynthetic nitrogen‐use efficiency between four contrasting species

Thijs L. Pons; Milka H. M. Westbeek

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
79
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Causes of differences in photosynthetic nitrogen‐use efficiency (PNUE), the rate of photosynthesis per unit leaf N, were investigated in four species. These were in order of decreasing PNUE; the two herbs Galinsoga ciliata and Origanum vulgare , and the two trees Populus nigra and Quercus robur . Plants were grown in pots outdoors at three levels of nutrient availability. The light‐ and CO 2 response of gas exchange of leaves were measured, and their nitrogen and chlorophyll contents were determined. Furthermore, the internal conductance for CO 2 diffusion was estimated. Nutrients did not have a large effect on PNUE except in Galinsoga . Leaf mass per unit area was negatively correlated with PNUE max , which is likely to be partly caused by N present in cell wall proteins among other non‐photosynthetic N compounds. The trees had a larger fraction of photosynthetic N in light harvesting components compared to the herbs. This contributed also substantially to the difference in PNUE at light saturation (PNUE max ) between the two groups, but not for PNUE calculated for an overcast day. Intercellular CO 2 concentration was high in Galinsoga and Populus , which contributed significantly to their higher PNUE max , particularly at low nutrient availability. The large gradient in CO 2 concentration between intercellular spaces and chloroplasts was another factor that explained a substantial part of the differences in PNUE max between Quercus and the other species that had smaller gradients. Stomatal and internal conductances for CO 2 explained most of the difference in PNUE max between Quercus and Populus at high nutrient availability for which these data were available.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency decreased in the order Galinsoga ciliata, Origanum vulgare, Populus nigra, Quercus robur.

Taxon
two herbs Galinsoga ciliata and Origanum vulgare , and the two trees Populus nigra and Quercus roburPopulus nigraQuercus roburOriganum vulgareGalinsoga quadriradiatae1
Outcome
PNUEe1
Direction
decreasinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus nigra
Populus nigra · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Quercus robur
Quercus robur · TaxonAlgirdas at Lithuanian Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Origanum vulgare
Origanum vulgare · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Galinsoga quadriradiata
Galinsoga quadriradiata · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in order of decreasing PNUE; the two herbs Galinsoga ciliata and Origanum vulgare , and the two trees Populus nigra and Quercus robur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient availability did not have a large effect on PNUE except in Galinsoga.

Taxon
GalinsogaGalinsogae1
Treatment
Nutrientse1
Outcome
PNUEe1
Direction
did not have a large effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Galinsoga
Galinsoga · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Juni from Kyoto, Japan · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Nutrients did not have a large effect on PNUE except in Galinsoga”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–643 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf mass per unit area was negatively correlated with PNUEmax.

Organ / stage
Leafe1
Outcome
PNUE maxe1
Direction
negatively correlatede1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“Leaf mass per unit area was negatively correlated with PNUE max”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–709 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The negative correlation between leaf mass per unit area and PNUEmax is likely partly caused by N present in cell wall proteins.

Outcome
PNUE maxe1
Qualifier
N present in cell wall proteinse1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“Leaf mass per unit area was negatively correlated with PNUE max , which is likely to be partly caused by N present in cell wall proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–782 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The trees had a larger fraction of photosynthetic N in light harvesting components than the herbs.

Taxon
treese1
Outcome
fraction of photosynthetic N in light harvesting componentse1
Direction
largere1
Comparator
herbse1

Verbatim

e1

“The trees had a larger fraction of photosynthetic N in light harvesting components compared to the herbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–931 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The larger light-harvesting N fraction contributed substantially to the PNUEmax difference between trees and herbs, but not to PNUE calculated for an overcast day.

Outcome
difference in PNUE at light saturation (PNUE max )e1
Qualifier
but not for PNUE calculated for an overcast daye1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“This contributed also substantially to the difference in PNUE at light saturation (PNUE max ) between the two groups, but not for PNUE calculated for an overcast day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1098 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High intercellular CO2 concentration in Galinsoga and Populus contributed significantly to their higher PNUEmax, particularly at low nutrient availability.

Taxon
Galinsoga and PopulusPopulusGalinsogae1
Compound
CO 2e1
Outcome
higher PNUE maxe1
Qualifier
particularly at low nutrient availabilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Galinsoga
Galinsoga · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Juni from Kyoto, Japan · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Intercellular CO 2 concentration was high in Galinsoga and Populus , which contributed significantly to their higher PNUE max , particularly at low nutrient availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1269 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The large CO2 gradient between intercellular spaces and chloroplasts explained a substantial part of the PNUEmax difference between Quercus and the other species.

Taxon
QuercusQuercuse1
Compound
CO 2e1
Outcome
differences in PNUE maxe1
Qualifier
large gradient in CO 2 concentration between intercellular spaces and chloroplastse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus
Quercus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)WikiVagant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The large gradient in CO 2 concentration between intercellular spaces and chloroplasts was another factor that explained a substantial part of the differences in PNUE max between Quercus and the other species that had smaller gradients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1506 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal and internal conductances for CO2 explained most of the PNUEmax difference between Quercus and Populus at high nutrient availability.

Taxon
Quercus and PopulusQuercusPopuluse1
Treatment
high nutrient availabilitye1
Outcome
difference in PNUE maxe1
Qualifier
Stomatal and internal conductances for CO 2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus
Quercus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)WikiVagant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Stomatal and internal conductances for CO 2 explained most of the difference in PNUE max between Quercus and Populus at high nutrient availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1654 · show in text ↑