Abstract
Causes of differences in photosynthetic nitrogen‐use efficiency (PNUE), the rate of photosynthesis per unit leaf N, were investigated in four species. These were in order of decreasing PNUE; the two herbs Galinsoga ciliata and Origanum vulgare , and the two trees Populus nigra and Quercus robur . Plants were grown in pots outdoors at three levels of nutrient availability. The light‐ and CO 2 response of gas exchange of leaves were measured, and their nitrogen and chlorophyll contents were determined. Furthermore, the internal conductance for CO 2 diffusion was estimated. Nutrients did not have a large effect on PNUE except in Galinsoga . Leaf mass per unit area was negatively correlated with PNUE max , which is likely to be partly caused by N present in cell wall proteins among other non‐photosynthetic N compounds. The trees had a larger fraction of photosynthetic N in light harvesting components compared to the herbs. This contributed also substantially to the difference in PNUE at light saturation (PNUE max ) between the two groups, but not for PNUE calculated for an overcast day. Intercellular CO 2 concentration was high in Galinsoga and Populus , which contributed significantly to their higher PNUE max , particularly at low nutrient availability. The large gradient in CO 2 concentration between intercellular spaces and chloroplasts was another factor that explained a substantial part of the differences in PNUE max between Quercus and the other species that had smaller gradients. Stomatal and internal conductances for CO 2 explained most of the difference in PNUE max between Quercus and Populus at high nutrient availability for which these data were available.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency decreased in the order Galinsoga ciliata, Origanum vulgare, Populus nigra, Quercus robur.
- Taxon
- two herbs Galinsoga ciliata and Origanum vulgare , and the two trees Populus nigra and Quercus robur
Populus nigraQuercus robur
Origanum vulgare
Galinsoga quadriradiatae1 - Outcome
- PNUEe1
- Direction
- decreasinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.



Verbatim
e1“in order of decreasing PNUE; the two herbs Galinsoga ciliata and Origanum vulgare , and the two trees Populus nigra and Quercus robur”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient availability did not have a large effect on PNUE except in Galinsoga.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Nutrients did not have a large effect on PNUE except in Galinsoga”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf mass per unit area was negatively correlated with PNUEmax.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e1“Leaf mass per unit area was negatively correlated with PNUE max”
Claim · model-written summary
The negative correlation between leaf mass per unit area and PNUEmax is likely partly caused by N present in cell wall proteins.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e1“Leaf mass per unit area was negatively correlated with PNUE max , which is likely to be partly caused by N present in cell wall proteins”
Claim · model-written summary
The trees had a larger fraction of photosynthetic N in light harvesting components than the herbs.
Verbatim
e1“The trees had a larger fraction of photosynthetic N in light harvesting components compared to the herbs”
Claim · model-written summary
The larger light-harvesting N fraction contributed substantially to the PNUEmax difference between trees and herbs, but not to PNUE calculated for an overcast day.
- Outcome
- difference in PNUE at light saturation (PNUE max )e1
- Qualifier
- but not for PNUE calculated for an overcast daye1
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e1“This contributed also substantially to the difference in PNUE at light saturation (PNUE max ) between the two groups, but not for PNUE calculated for an overcast day”
Claim · model-written summary
High intercellular CO2 concentration in Galinsoga and Populus contributed significantly to their higher PNUEmax, particularly at low nutrient availability.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e1“Intercellular CO 2 concentration was high in Galinsoga and Populus , which contributed significantly to their higher PNUE max , particularly at low nutrient availability”
Claim · model-written summary
The large CO2 gradient between intercellular spaces and chloroplasts explained a substantial part of the PNUEmax difference between Quercus and the other species.
- Compound
- CO 2e1
- Outcome
- differences in PNUE maxe1
- Qualifier
- large gradient in CO 2 concentration between intercellular spaces and chloroplastse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The large gradient in CO 2 concentration between intercellular spaces and chloroplasts was another factor that explained a substantial part of the differences in PNUE max between Quercus and the other species that had smaller gradients”
Claim · model-written summary
Stomatal and internal conductances for CO2 explained most of the PNUEmax difference between Quercus and Populus at high nutrient availability.
- Treatment
- high nutrient availabilitye1
- Outcome
- difference in PNUE maxe1
- Qualifier
- Stomatal and internal conductances for CO 2e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e1“Stomatal and internal conductances for CO 2 explained most of the difference in PNUE max between Quercus and Populus at high nutrient availability”