Paper · 2010 · International Journal of Phytoremediation

Field Note: Successful Establishment of a Phytoremediation System at a Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Shallow Aquifer: Trends, Trials, and Tribulations

Rachel L. Cook; James E. Landmeyer; Brad Atkinson; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We report the establishment of a mixed hybrid poplar (Populus spp.) and willow (Salix spp.) phytoremediation system at a fuel-contaminated site. Several approaches were used to balance competing goals of cost-effectiveness yet successful tree establishment without artificial irrigation or trenching. Bare root and unrooted cuttings were installed using either: (1) 1.2 m deep holes excavated with an 8 cm diameter auger using a direct-push rig and backfilled with the excavated, in situ soil; (2) 1.2 m deep holes created with a 23 cm diameter auger attached to a Bobcat rig and backfilled with clean topsoil from offsite; and (3) shallow holes between 15-30 cm deep that were created with a 1.3 cm diameter rod and no backfill. Tree mortality from initial plantings indicated contaminated zones not quantified in prior site investigations and remedial actions. Aquifer heterogeneity, underground utilities, and prior remediation infrastructure hampered the ability of the site to support a traditional experimental design. Total stem length and mortality were measured for all planted trees and were incorporated into a geographic information system. Planting early in the growing season, augering a larger diameter hole, and backfilling with clean, uncontaminated topsoil was cost effective and allowed for greater tree cutting growth and survival.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mortality of the initially planted trees indicated contaminated zones that prior site investigations and remedial actions had not quantified.

Taxon
hybrid poplar (Populus spp.) and willow (Salix spp.)PopulusSalixe0
Outcome
Tree mortalitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Salix
Salix · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed hybrid poplar (Populus spp.) and willow (Salix spp.) phytoremediation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tree mortality from initial plantings indicated contaminated zones not quantified in prior site investigations and remedial actions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting early in the growing season, augering a larger diameter hole and backfilling with clean topsoil was cost effective and gave greater tree cutting growth and survival.

Taxon
hybrid poplar (Populus spp.) and willow (Salix spp.)PopulusSalixe0
Treatment
Planting early in the growing season, augering a larger diameter hole, and backfilling with clean, uncontaminated topsoile2
Outcome
tree cutting growth and survivale2
Direction
greatere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Salix
Salix · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed hybrid poplar (Populus spp.) and willow (Salix spp.) phytoremediation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–115 · show in text ↑
e2

“Planting early in the growing season, augering a larger diameter hole, and backfilling with clean, uncontaminated topsoil was cost effective and allowed for greater tree cutting growth and survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1350 · show in text ↑

climate site · growth · Salix (willows)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

climate site · growth · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.