Paper · 2013 · Agricultural Advances

Effect of nitrogen source and water management on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency

Md. Abdullah Al Mamun; M. R. Islam; S. M. Shahidullah

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We conducted two experiments usingprilled urea and urea super granule to examine the effects of nitrogen sourceand water stress on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency. The experimentaltreatments were 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 kg N ha-1 (experiment 1). Thewater stress treatments were: no fertilizer + continuous standing water, waterstress before first urea top dress, water stress before second urea top dress,water stress before third urea top dress, water stress before first, second andthird urea top dress and all fertilizers+continuousstanding water (experiment 2). The experiment was laid out in a randomizedcomplete block design with four replications. BRRI dhan49 was used as plantingmaterial. Urea super granule at 75 kg N ha-1 was enough for riceproduction in aman season and save 25 kg N ha-1 which was equivalentto 55 kg urea. During application of prilled urea water stress before third topdress performed better than continuous standing water in terms of grain yieldand nitrogen use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea super granule at 75 kg N/ha was sufficient for rice production in the aman season and saved 25 kg N/ha.

Treatment
Urea super granule at 75 kg N ha-1e1
Outcome
riceproductione1
Value
25 kg N ha-1e1
Qualifier
save 25 kg N ha-1 which was equivalentto 55 kg ureae1
Setting
aman seasone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Urea super granule at 75 kg N ha-1 was enough for riceproduction in aman season and save 25 kg N ha-1 which was equivalentto 55 kg urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress before the third top dress performed better than continuous standing water for grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of rice with prilled urea.

Material
BRRI dhan49e3
Treatment
water stress before third topdresse2
Outcome
grain yieldand nitrogen use efficiencye2
Direction
performed bettere2
Comparator
continuous standing watere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Urea super granule at 75 kg N ha-1 was enough for riceproduction in aman season and save 25 kg N ha-1 which was equivalentto 55 kg urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–837 · show in text ↑
e2

“During application of prilled urea water stress before third topdress performed better than continuous standing water in terms of grain yieldand nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–1007 · show in text ↑
e3

“BRRI dhan49 was used as plantingmaterial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–700 · show in text ↑

drought · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.