Paper · 2007 · Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research

Vegetative and reproductive plasticity of broccoli at three levels of incident photosynthetically active radiation

N. Francescangeli; M.A. Sangiacomo; H.R. Martí

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To study the effects of shading on the growth, development, dry matter partitioning, and plant architecture of broccoli, "Legacy" hybrid plants were grown in pots in a greenhouse under black shading meshes to generate different levels of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). The average incident PAR was 23 mol PPF square m/d under control conditions, 15.2 under a 35% mesh, and 6.7 under a 70% mesh. The air temperature was within the range 15-22 deg C. As shading increased so did the duration of the growth cycle and the leaf area (LA). Shading did not affect the number of leaves, although the upper ones were more erect. The stem length and the accumulated intercepted PAR (IPAR) were negatively related. Inflorescence diameter and commercial fresh weight decreased only with the 70% mesh. Shading did not affect stem dry weight (DW) but altered dry matter allocation in the root and spear. The DW of the leaves maintained an average 45.7% of the total DW despite the greater LA developed under shade. The net assimilation rate diminished with the reduction of IPAR, and the LA increased; the plant relative growth rate was therefore practically constant. With increased shading, the leaves and the stem became the dominant photosynthate sinks. The commercial fresh weight achieved with 15.2 mol photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) square m/d was equivalent to that obtained with 23 mol PPF square m/d, but the cycle was extended for 4.5 days. With 6.7 mol PPF square m/d, yield diminished because of the lower DW produced in a cycle extended by 15 days, and because more dry matter was allocated to the stem than to the spear. Based on these results, broccoli could be considered a shade-tolerant plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing shade extended the growth cycle and increased leaf area.

Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
duration of the growth cycle and the leaf area (LA)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As shading increased so did the duration of the growth cycle and the leaf area (LA).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading did not change the number of leaves.

Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading did not affect the number of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper leaves were more erect under shading.

Outcome
upper onese0
Direction
more erecte0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“although the upper ones were more erect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem length was negatively associated with accumulated intercepted PAR.

Treatment
accumulated intercepted PAR (IPAR)e0
Outcome
stem lengthe0
Direction
negatively relatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The stem length and the accumulated intercepted PAR (IPAR) were negatively related.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 70% mesh reduced inflorescence diameter and commercial fresh weight.

Treatment
70% meshe0
Outcome
Inflorescence diameter and commercial fresh weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inflorescence diameter and commercial fresh weight decreased only with the 70% mesh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading did not change stem dry weight.

Outcome
stem dry weight (DW)e0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading did not affect stem dry weight (DW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading altered dry matter allocation between root and spear.

Outcome
dry matter allocation in the root and speare0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but altered dry matter allocation in the root and spear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf dry weight remained an average 45.7% of total dry weight despite increased leaf area under shade.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
shadee0
Outcome
DW of the leavese0
Value
45.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DW of the leaves maintained an average 45.7% of the total DW despite the greater LA developed under shade.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net assimilation rate diminished as intercepted PAR fell.

Treatment
reduction of IPARe0
Outcome
net assimilation ratee0
Direction
diminishede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net assimilation rate diminished with the reduction of IPAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative growth rate was practically constant as leaf area increased.

Outcome
plant relative growth ratee0
Direction
practically constante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the LA increased; the plant relative growth rate was therefore practically constant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves and stem became dominant photosynthate sinks with increased shading.

Organ / stage
leaves and the steme0
Treatment
increased shadinge0
Outcome
dominant photosynthate sinkse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increased shading, the leaves and the stem became the dominant photosynthate sinks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial fresh weight at 15.2 mol PPF square m/d equaled that at 23 mol PPF square m/d.

Treatment
15.2 mol photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) square m/de0
Outcome
commercial fresh weighte0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
23 mol PPF square m/de0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The commercial fresh weight achieved with 15.2 mol photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) square m/d was equivalent to that obtained with 23 mol PPF square m/d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth cycle at 15.2 mol PPF square m/d was extended by 4.5 days.

Outcome
cyclee0
Direction
extendede0
Value
4.5 dayse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but the cycle was extended for 4.5 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield diminished at 6.7 mol PPF square m/d.

Treatment
6.7 mol PPF square m/de0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
diminishede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With 6.7 mol PPF square m/d, yield diminished because of the lower DW produced in a cycle extended by 15 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1561 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The low-PAR cycle was extended by 15 days.

Outcome
cyclee0
Direction
extendede0
Value
15 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a cycle extended by 15 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1561 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More dry matter was allocated to stem than spear at low PAR.

Organ / stage
steme0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
speare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more dry matter was allocated to the stem than to the spear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1635 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered broccoli shade tolerant.

Outcome
shade-tolerant plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broccoli could be considered a shade-tolerant plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1660–1712 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑

light · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

light · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 40 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.