Paper · 2013 · Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture

Effect of edible chitosan/zeolite coating on tomatoes quality during refrigerated storage

Mario Garca; Alicia Casariego; Ra Roblejo

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
55
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of chitosan coatings combined with zeolite on tomato (Lycopersicon sculentum cv. FA-180 HAZERA) quality attributes during refrigerated storage. Coatings were applied by double immersion of fruits in the film-forming solutions for 5 min, depending on treatments: (i) chitosan at 1.5% (w/v) in lactic acid 1% (v/v); (ii) chitosan at 1.5% (w/v) in lactic acid 1% (v/v) and Tween 80 at 0.1% (w/v); and (iii) chitosan at 1.5% (w/v) in lactic acid 1% (v/v) and zeolite at 3% (w/w based on chitosan). Fruits were allowed to dry by forced convection for 2 h at 25ºC and were subsequently stored at 10ºC during 37 days. The effectiveness of the treatments in extending fruit shelf-life was evaluated by determining fungal decay, respiration rate, quality attributes and overall visual appearance. No sign of fungal decay was observed during the storage period. The addition of zeolite at 3% (w/w based on chitosan) and Tween 80 at 0.1% (v/v) in chitosan solution improved its coating properties delaying the ripening of tomatoes, although did not constitute an effective barriers against the weight losses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No fungal decay was observed in stored tomatoes.

Outcome
No sign of fungal decaye0
Qualifier
during the storage periode0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“No sign of fungal decay was observed during the storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding zeolite to chitosan coating delayed tomato ripening.

Treatment
zeolite at 3% (w/w based on chitosan)e0
Outcome
ripening of tomatoese0
Direction
delayinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The addition of zeolite at 3% (w/w based on chitosan) and Tween 80 at 0.1% (v/v) in chitosan solution improved its coating properties delaying the ripening of tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Tween 80 to chitosan coating delayed tomato ripening.

Treatment
Tween 80 at 0.1% (v/v)e0
Outcome
ripening of tomatoese0
Direction
delayinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The addition of zeolite at 3% (w/w based on chitosan) and Tween 80 at 0.1% (v/v) in chitosan solution improved its coating properties delaying the ripening of tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding zeolite improved coating properties.

Treatment
zeolite at 3% (w/w based on chitosan)e0
Outcome
coating propertiese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The addition of zeolite at 3% (w/w based on chitosan) and Tween 80 at 0.1% (v/v) in chitosan solution improved its coating properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Tween 80 improved coating properties.

Treatment
Tween 80 at 0.1% (v/v)e0
Outcome
coating propertiese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The addition of zeolite at 3% (w/w based on chitosan) and Tween 80 at 0.1% (v/v) in chitosan solution improved its coating properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The zeolite addition did not effectively prevent weight loss.

Treatment
zeolite at 3% (w/w based on chitosan)e0
Outcome
weight lossese0
Direction
did not constitute an effective barrierse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The addition of zeolite at 3% (w/w based on chitosan) and Tween 80 at 0.1% (v/v) in chitosan solution improved its coating properties delaying the ripening of tomatoes, although did not constitute an effective barriers against the weight losses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Tween 80 addition did not effectively prevent weight loss.

Treatment
Tween 80 at 0.1% (v/v)e0
Outcome
weight lossese0
Direction
did not constitute an effective barrierse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The addition of zeolite at 3% (w/w based on chitosan) and Tween 80 at 0.1% (v/v) in chitosan solution improved its coating properties delaying the ripening of tomatoes, although did not constitute an effective barriers against the weight losses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1151 · show in text ↑

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 39 positive, 1 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

other · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.