Paper · 2023 · Kufa Journal for Agricultural Sciences

Efficacy of Chitosan and Salicylic acid for Controlling Gray mold Caused by Botrytis cinerea on Greenhouse Tomato

Muhammed Ridha Hussein Al-Mussawi; Firas Ali Ahamed

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Application of Chitosan (CH) and salicylic acid (SA) in controlling the fungus Botrytis cinerea that causes gray mold on tomato fruits is a successful and safe alternative approach to chemical pesticides. Chitosan and salicylic acid were applied as Pre-harvest treatment at the concentration of 2000 mg/l and 250 mg/L under field the conditions on three different ripening stages of tomato fruits Turning, Pink, Light Red stages and to determine the best stage for application. The best concentration was determined in enhancing plant defenses against the pathogen and studying the effect of factors on the levels of some enzymes related to induction of resistance, such as peroxidase enzyme POD and PAL enzyme. The application of SA and CH had a significant effect in increasing the activity level of both enzymes, and treatment with salicylic revealed to an increase in the activity of POD enzyme in the treated plants and for the three fruit maturity stages (Turning, Pink, Light red), where the enzyme level was 17.33, 16.72 and 15.5 min /gm. The three stages of fruit ripening had an effect on increasing the activity of the POD enzyme, as it recorded 12.27, 12.12, 12.1 min/gm fresh weight, and the ripening stage affected the PAL enzyme, which was recorded at a level of 32.27, 31.53, 31.87 mg/gm fresh weight, for the three stages, respectively. Chitosan and salicylic did not differ in extending the shelf life of fruits and reducing losses depending on the rate of healthy fruits for the three stages at the end of the storage period at 25°C. Chitosan at a concentration of 2000 mg-1/L differed significantly from other concentrations in inhibiting the pathogenic fungus, as well as salicyac at a concentration of 250 mg-1/L was superior in its effectiveness compared with other concentrations. However, chitosan had a significant effect on the biofilm formation of B. cinerea, which displayed an average absorption degree of 0.53 (OD), while salicylic did not affect fungal biofilm formation, as the average absorption degree was 1.2 (OD) which did not differ from the control treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan and salicylic acid increased POD and PAL activity.

Treatment
SA and CHe0
Outcome
activity level of both enzymese0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of SA and CH had a significant effect in increasing the activity level of both enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greenhouse Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid increased POD activity across turning, pink and light red fruit.

Organ / stage
Turning, Pink, Light rede0
Treatment
salicylice0
Outcome
activity of POD enzymee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
17.33, 16.72 and 15.5 min /gme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment with salicylic revealed to an increase in the activity of POD enzyme in the treated plants and for the three fruit maturity stages (Turning, Pink, Light red), where the enzyme level was 17.33, 16.72 and 15.5 min /gm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greenhouse Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POD activity differed across ripening stages.

Organ / stage
three stages of fruit ripeninge0
Outcome
activity of the POD enzymee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
12.27, 12.12, 12.1 min/gm fresh weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The three stages of fruit ripening had an effect on increasing the activity of the POD enzyme, as it recorded 12.27, 12.12, 12.1 min/gm fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greenhouse Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAL activity varied across ripening stages.

Organ / stage
ripening stagee0
Outcome
PAL enzymee0
Value
32.27, 31.53, 31.87 mg/gm fresh weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ripening stage affected the PAL enzyme, which was recorded at a level of 32.27, 31.53, 31.87 mg/gm fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greenhouse Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan and salicylic acid did not differ in fruit shelf life and losses.

Treatment
Chitosane0
Outcome
shelf life of fruits and reducing lossese0
Direction
did not differe0
Qualifier
at the end of the storage period at 25°Ce0
Comparator
salicylice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan and salicylic did not differ in extending the shelf life of fruits and reducing losses depending on the rate of healthy fruits for the three stages at the end of the storage period at 25°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greenhouse Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan at 2000 mg-1/L significantly inhibited the fungus relative to other concentrations.

Treatment
Chitosan at a concentration of 2000 mg-1/Le0
Outcome
inhibiting the pathogenic funguse0
Direction
inhibitinge0
Comparator
other concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan at a concentration of 2000 mg-1/L differed significantly from other concentrations in inhibiting the pathogenic fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1680 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greenhouse Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid at 250 mg-1/L was more effective than other concentrations.

Treatment
salicyac at a concentration of 250 mg-1/Le0
Outcome
effectivenesse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
other concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salicyac at a concentration of 250 mg-1/L was superior in its effectiveness compared with other concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1803 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greenhouse Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan affected B. cinerea biofilm formation.

Treatment
chitosane0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
biofilm formation of B. cinereae0
Value
0.53 (OD)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chitosan had a significant effect on the biofilm formation of B. cinerea, which displayed an average absorption degree of 0.53 (OD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greenhouse Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid did not affect fungal biofilm formation.

Treatment
salicylice0
Outcome
fungal biofilm formatione0
Direction
did not affecte0
Value
1.2 (OD)e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salicylic did not affect fungal biofilm formation, as the average absorption degree was 1.2 (OD) which did not differ from the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1953–2097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greenhouse Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑

chitosan · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 38 positive, 2 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 39 positive, 1 negative or no effect

39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

chitosan · physiology: enzyme activity · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chitosan · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.