Paper · 2024 · Polymers

Effect of Chitosan/Gum Arabic Blends Enriched by Sodium Nitroprusside or Methyl Salicylate on the Storability and Antioxidant Activity of Tomato Fruit

Mohamed A. Taher; Dawood H. Dawood; Mohammed A. E. Selim; et al.

14
claims
26
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The impact of methyl salicylate (MeSA) or sodium nitroprusside (SNP) in chitosan (CS)/Gum Arabic (GA) mixture on physio-chemical characteristics and antioxidant status during the postharvest ripening of green tomato fruits was studied. CS/GA-MeSA at a 1 mM formulation was the best treatment to retard firmness and titratable acidity (TA) losses. Moreover, this formulation retarded pigmentation progress where it had the lowest significant values of total carotenes (TCs) and lycopene (LYP) contents until the 15th day of the storage period, as well as efficiently faced the rise in malondialdehyde (MDA) levels. Moreover, peroxidase (POD), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), catalase (CAT), and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activities of tomatoes treated with CS/GA-SNP at 2 mM were significantly better than that of control in the primary stages of storage. CS/GA-SNP at a 2 mM formulation showed an extremely high significant content of total polyphenol (TP) in the early stage of storage, while CS/GA and CS/GA-MeSA at 1 and 2 mM accumulated higher significant TP contents than uncoated fruits at the late stage of storage. All formulations were characterized by FTIR spectroscopy. Furthermore, the polymer formulations exhibited strong antifungal activity against Alternaria alternata and Botrytis cinerea as major pathogens of postharvest tomatoes. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) observations for the mycelia of both fungi treated by CS/GA-MeSA at 2 mM revealed serious ultrastructural damage, including distortion of the cell wall and cell membrane and degradation of cytoplasmic organelles.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CS/GA-MeSA at 1 mM best retarded firmness loss.

Taxon
Tomato FruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
CS/GA-MeSA at a 1 mM formulatione0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
retarde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CS/GA-MeSA at a 1 mM formulation was the best treatment to retard firmness and titratable acidity (TA) losses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CS/GA-MeSA at 1 mM best retarded titratable acidity loss.

Taxon
Tomato FruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
CS/GA-MeSA at a 1 mM formulatione0
Outcome
titratable acidity (TA) lossese0
Direction
retarde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CS/GA-MeSA at a 1 mM formulation was the best treatment to retard firmness and titratable acidity (TA) losses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CS/GA-MeSA at 1 mM retarded pigmentation and lowered carotene and lycopene contents through day 15.

Taxon
Tomato FruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
CS/GA-MeSA at a 1 mM formulatione1
Outcome
total carotenes (TCs) and lycopene (LYP) contentse0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
until the 15th day of the storage periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this formulation retarded pigmentation progress where it had the lowest significant values of total carotenes (TCs) and lycopene (LYP) contents until the 15th day of the storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“CS/GA-MeSA at a 1 mM formulation was the best treatment to retard firmness and titratable acidity (TA) losses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–346 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CS/GA-MeSA at 1 mM countered the rise in malondialdehyde.

Taxon
Tomato FruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
CS/GA-MeSA at a 1 mM formulatione1
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) levelse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as well as efficiently faced the rise in malondialdehyde (MDA) levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–613 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“CS/GA-MeSA at a 1 mM formulation was the best treatment to retard firmness and titratable acidity (TA) losses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–346 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CS/GA-SNP at 2 mM improved POD, PPO and CAT activities versus control early in storage.

Treatment
CS/GA-SNP at 2 mMe0
Outcome
peroxidase (POD), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
primary stages of storagee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peroxidase (POD), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), catalase (CAT), and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activities of tomatoes treated with CS/GA-SNP at 2 mM were significantly better than that of control in the primary stages of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CS/GA-SNP at 2 mM improved PAL activity versus control early in storage.

Treatment
CS/GA-SNP at 2 mMe0
Outcome
phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activitiese0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
primary stages of storagee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peroxidase (POD), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), catalase (CAT), and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activities of tomatoes treated with CS/GA-SNP at 2 mM were significantly better than that of control in the primary stages of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CS/GA-SNP at 2 mM produced very high total polyphenol content early in storage.

Taxon
Tomato FruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
CS/GA-SNP at a 2 mM formulatione0
Outcome
content of total polyphenol (TP)e0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
early stage of storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CS/GA-SNP at a 2 mM formulation showed an extremely high significant content of total polyphenol (TP) in the early stage of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CS/GA coatings produced higher total polyphenol content than uncoated fruit late in storage.

Taxon
Tomato FruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
CS/GAe0
Outcome
TP contentse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
late stage of storagee0
Comparator
uncoated fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CS/GA and CS/GA-MeSA at 1 and 2 mM accumulated higher significant TP contents than uncoated fruits at the late stage of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CS/GA-MeSA at 1 mM produced higher total polyphenol content than uncoated fruit late in storage.

Taxon
Tomato FruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
CS/GA-MeSA at 1e0
Outcome
TP contentse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
late stage of storagee0
Comparator
uncoated fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CS/GA and CS/GA-MeSA at 1 and 2 mM accumulated higher significant TP contents than uncoated fruits at the late stage of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CS/GA-MeSA at 2 mM produced higher total polyphenol content than uncoated fruit late in storage.

Taxon
Tomato FruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
CS/GA-MeSA at 1 and 2 mMe0
Outcome
TP contentse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
late stage of storagee0
Comparator
uncoated fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CS/GA and CS/GA-MeSA at 1 and 2 mM accumulated higher significant TP contents than uncoated fruits at the late stage of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymer formulations had strong antifungal activity against Alternaria alternata.

Treatment
polymer formulationse0
Interactor
Alternaria alternataAlternaria alternatae0pathogen
Outcome
antifungal activity against Alternaria alternatae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the polymer formulations exhibited strong antifungal activity against Alternaria alternata and Botrytis cinerea as major pathogens of postharvest tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymer formulations had strong antifungal activity against Botrytis cinerea.

Treatment
polymer formulationse0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
antifungal activitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the polymer formulations exhibited strong antifungal activity against Alternaria alternata and Botrytis cinerea as major pathogens of postharvest tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CS/GA-MeSA at 2 mM seriously damaged Alternaria alternata mycelia ultrastructure.

Taxon
Tomato FruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
CS/GA-MeSA at 2 mMe0
Interactor
Alternaria alternataAlternaria alternatae0pathogen
Outcome
mycelia of both fungie0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alternaria alternata and Botrytis cinerea as major pathogens of postharvest tomatoes. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) observations for the mycelia of both fungi treated by CS/GA-MeSA at 2 mM revealed serious ultrastructural damage, including distortion of the cell wall and cell membrane and degradation of cytoplasmic organelles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CS/GA-MeSA at 2 mM seriously damaged Botrytis cinerea mycelia ultrastructure.

Taxon
Tomato FruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
CS/GA-MeSA at 2 mMe0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
mycelia of both fungie0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alternaria alternata and Botrytis cinerea as major pathogens of postharvest tomatoes. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) observations for the mycelia of both fungi treated by CS/GA-MeSA at 2 mM revealed serious ultrastructural damage, including distortion of the cell wall and cell membrane and degradation of cytoplasmic organelles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑

chitosan · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

chitosan · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

chitosan · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Gibberellic acid · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Gibberellic acid · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

chitosan · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 39 positive, 1 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

chitosan · Alternaria alternata · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.