Paper · 2003 · Weed Technology

Winter Annual Weed Control with Fall-Applied Corn (Zea mays) Herbicides1

RONALD F. KRAUSZ; BRYAN G. YOUNG; JOSEPH L. MATTHEWS

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
36
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted during the 2000 to 2001 growing seasons to evaluate winter annual weed control and crop tolerance with fall-applied herbicides in corn at Belleville, IL. Atrazine, simazine, and rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron applied in the fall controlled mouseear chickweed, henbit, and Carolina foxtail 93% or greater at planting the following spring. Flumetsulam controlled mouseear chickweed and henbit 98 and 93%, respectively, at planting. Metribuzin controlled mouseear chickweed and henbit 100 and 97%, respectively. CGA-152005 controlled mouseear chickweed, henbit, and wild garlic 93 to 100%. CGA-152005 provided the greatest control of wild garlic, with control ranging from 94 to 100% at planting. CGA-152005 plus simazine controlled 99 to 100% of all winter annual weeds evaluated. Reducing winter annual weed vegetation did not increase soil temperatures at 5-cm depth in May. CGA-152005 caused discoloration and height reduction of corn. CGA-152005 at the highest rate (60 g ai/ha) reduced corn plant height by 7% and grain yield by 8%.Nomenclature: Atrazine; CGA-152005, 1-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-triazin-2-yl)-3-[[2-(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)-phenylsulfonyl]]-urea; flumetsulam; metribuzin; rimsulfuron; simazine; thifensulfuron; Carolina foxtail, Alopercurus carolinianus Walt. #3 ALOCA; henbit, Lamium amplexicaule L. # LAMAM; mouseear chickweed, Cerastium vulgatum L. # CERVU; wild garlic, Allium vineale L. # ALLVI; corn, Zea mays (L.) ‘Pioneer 33G28 LL’.Additional index words: Discoloration, height reduction, preemergence.Abbreviations: DAP, days after planting; DAT, days after treatment; POST, postemergence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall-applied atrazine, simazine, and rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron controlled mouseear chickweed, henbit and Carolina foxtail at 93% or greater.

Treatment
Atrazine, simazine, and rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron applied in the falle1
Interactor
mouseear chickweede1weed
Second interactor
henbitLamium amplexicaulee1weed
Outcome
mouseear chickweed, henbit, and Carolina foxtaile1
Direction
controllede1
Value
93% or greatere1
Setting
Belleville, ILe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lamium amplexicaule
Lamium amplexicaule · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field studies were conducted during the 2000 to 2001 growing seasons to evaluate winter annual weed control and crop tolerance with fall-applied herbicides in corn at Belleville, IL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“Atrazine, simazine, and rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron applied in the fall controlled mouseear chickweed, henbit, and Carolina foxtail 93% or greater at planting the following spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CGA-152005 at the highest rate reduced corn plant height by 7%.

Treatment
CGA-152005 at the highest rate (60 g ai/ha)e6
Outcome
corn plant heighte6
Direction
reducede6
Value
7%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field studies were conducted during the 2000 to 2001 growing seasons to evaluate winter annual weed control and crop tolerance with fall-applied herbicides in corn at Belleville, IL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e6

“CGA-152005 at the highest rate (60 g ai/ha) reduced corn plant height by 7% and grain yield by 8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CGA-152005 at the highest rate reduced grain yield by 8%.

Treatment
CGA-152005 at the highest rate (60 g ai/ha)e6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Direction
reducede6
Value
8%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field studies were conducted during the 2000 to 2001 growing seasons to evaluate winter annual weed control and crop tolerance with fall-applied herbicides in corn at Belleville, IL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e6

“CGA-152005 at the highest rate (60 g ai/ha) reduced corn plant height by 7% and grain yield by 8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CGA-152005 caused discoloration of corn.

Treatment
CGA-152005e7
Outcome
discoloratione7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field studies were conducted during the 2000 to 2001 growing seasons to evaluate winter annual weed control and crop tolerance with fall-applied herbicides in corn at Belleville, IL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e7

“CGA-152005 caused discoloration and height reduction of corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing winter annual weed vegetation did not increase soil temperatures at 5-cm depth in May.

Treatment
Reducing winter annual weed vegetatione7
Outcome
soil temperatures at 5-cm depthe7
Direction
did not increasee7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field studies were conducted during the 2000 to 2001 growing seasons to evaluate winter annual weed control and crop tolerance with fall-applied herbicides in corn at Belleville, IL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e7

“Reducing winter annual weed vegetation did not increase soil temperatures at 5-cm depth in May”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flumetsulam controlled mouseear chickweed and henbit at 98 and 93%.

Treatment
Flumetsulame2
Interactor
mouseear chickweede2weed
Second interactor
henbitLamium amplexicaulee2weed
Outcome
mouseear chickweed and henbite2
Direction
controllede2
Value
98 and 93%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lamium amplexicaule
Lamium amplexicaule · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field studies were conducted during the 2000 to 2001 growing seasons to evaluate winter annual weed control and crop tolerance with fall-applied herbicides in corn at Belleville, IL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e2

“Flumetsulam controlled mouseear chickweed and henbit 98 and 93%, respectively, at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin controlled mouseear chickweed and henbit at 100 and 97%.

Treatment
Metribuzine3
Interactor
mouseear chickweede3weed
Second interactor
henbitLamium amplexicaulee3weed
Outcome
mouseear chickweed and henbite3
Direction
controllede3
Value
100 and 97%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lamium amplexicaule
Lamium amplexicaule · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field studies were conducted during the 2000 to 2001 growing seasons to evaluate winter annual weed control and crop tolerance with fall-applied herbicides in corn at Belleville, IL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e3

“Metribuzin controlled mouseear chickweed and henbit 100 and 97%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CGA-152005 controlled mouseear chickweed, henbit and wild garlic at 93 to 100%.

Treatment
CGA-152005e4
Interactor
mouseear chickweede4weed
Second interactor
henbitLamium amplexicaulee4weed
Outcome
mouseear chickweed, henbit, and wild garlice4
Direction
controllede4
Value
93 to 100%e4
Qualifier
wild garlice4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lamium amplexicaule
Lamium amplexicaule · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field studies were conducted during the 2000 to 2001 growing seasons to evaluate winter annual weed control and crop tolerance with fall-applied herbicides in corn at Belleville, IL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e4

“CGA-152005 controlled mouseear chickweed, henbit, and wild garlic 93 to 100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CGA-152005 gave the greatest control of wild garlic, at 94 to 100% at planting.

Treatment
CGA-152005e5
Interactor
wild garlicAllium ursinume5weed
Outcome
wild garlice5
Direction
greateste5
Value
94 to 100%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium ursinum
Allium ursinum · InteractorH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field studies were conducted during the 2000 to 2001 growing seasons to evaluate winter annual weed control and crop tolerance with fall-applied herbicides in corn at Belleville, IL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e5

“CGA-152005 provided the greatest control of wild garlic, with control ranging from 94 to 100% at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CGA-152005 plus simazine controlled 99 to 100% of all winter annual weeds evaluated.

Treatment
CGA-152005 plus simazinee6
Outcome
all winter annual weedse6
Direction
controllede6
Value
99 to 100%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field studies were conducted during the 2000 to 2001 growing seasons to evaluate winter annual weed control and crop tolerance with fall-applied herbicides in corn at Belleville, IL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
e6

“CGA-152005 plus simazine controlled 99 to 100% of all winter annual weeds evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–807 · show in text ↑

atrazine · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Flumetsulam · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

rimsulfuron · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

metribuzin · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

simazine · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.