Paper · 2012 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Winter Wheat Growth and Yield Influenced by Wild Barley (Hordeum spontaneum Koch) Competition

R. Hamidi; D. Mazaheri

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted at Karaj, Iran to evaluate the growth and yield responses of winter wheat tovarious densities of wild barley and nitrogen (N) application rates. The experimental design was split-plot with 3replications. The main factor was four N levels of 0, 130, 260, and 390 kg Urea per ha and the sub factor was weeddensities. Results showed that in unfertilized plots, wild barley densities of 80 and 160 plants per sq. metersignificantly decreased wheat plant height, LAI and tillers. In comparison to excess N and N deficiency treatments,the optimal N rate decreased wheat LAI losses at weed densities of 80 and 160 plants per sq. m. Wild barley hadgreater plant height and the number of tillers per plant at densities of 20 and 40 plants per sq. meter. At 130 kg Nper ha, weed densities of 20, 40, and 80 plants per sq. meter did not reduce the number of crop ear compared tohand-weeded plots. On unfertilized plots with 40, 80, and 160 weed plants per sq. meter, the reduction in numberof grains per ear were 18 and 38%, respectively. Nitrogen rates of 130 and 260 kg per ha increased crop and weedGNCs, whereas their STNCs were increased by N rate up to of 390 kg per ha. Added N resulted in higher winterwheat ANUE compared to weed ANUE.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In unfertilized plots, wild barley at 80 and 160 plants per square meter significantly decreased wheat plant height, LAI and tillers.

Treatment
wild barley densities of 80 and 160 plants per sq. metere0
Interactor
wild barleyHordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneume0weed
Outcome
plant height, LAI and tillerse1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
in unfertilized plotse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneum
Hordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneum · Interactor · picture of the speciesJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in unfertilized plots, wild barley densities of 80 and 160 plants per sq. meter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–445 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly decreased wheat plant height, LAI and tillers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–504 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild barley at 20 and 40 plants per square meter had greater plant height and more tillers per plant.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
wild barleyHordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneume1weed
Outcome
plant height and the number of tillers per plante0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneum
Hordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneum · Interactor · picture of the speciesJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat Growth and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“greater plant height and the number of tillers per plant at densities of 20 and 40 plants per sq. meter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–774 · show in text ↑
e1

“in unfertilized plots, wild barley densities of 80 and 160 plants per sq. meter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 130 kg N per ha, weed densities of 20, 40 and 80 plants per square meter did not reduce crop ear number compared with hand-weeded plots.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
weed densities of 20, 40, and 80 plants per sq. metere0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
number of crop eare0
Direction
did not reducee0
Qualifier
At 130 kg Ne2
Comparator
hand-weeded plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat Growth and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“weed densities of 20, 40, and 80 plants per sq. meter did not reduce the number of crop ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“hand-weeded plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–915 · show in text ↑
e2

“At 130 kg N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rates of 130 and 260 kg per ha increased crop and weed GNCs.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Nitrogen rates of 130 and 260 kg per hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
GNCse1
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat Growth and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nitrogen rates of 130 and 260 kg per ha increased crop and weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1122 · show in text ↑
e1

“GNCs, whereas their STNCs were increased by N rate up to of 390 kg per ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N rate up to 390 kg per ha increased STNCs.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N rate up to of 390 kg per hae1
Outcome
STNCse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat Growth and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“GNCs, whereas their STNCs were increased by N rate up to of 390 kg per ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added N resulted in higher winter wheat ANUE than weed ANUE.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Added Ne0
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
ANUEe1
Direction
highere0
Comparator
weed ANUEe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat Growth and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“Added N resulted in higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1223 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to weed ANUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1262 · show in text ↑

Hordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneum · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.