Paper · 2014 · Advances in Crop Science and Technology

Integrated Weed Management in Rabi Sweet Corn (Zea mays L. var. Saccharata)

Mathukia RK Dobariya VK; Gohil BS Chhodavadia SK

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2010-11 at Junagadh (Gujarat, India) to find out most efficient and economical method of weed control in rabi sweet corn (Zea mays L. var. saccharata Sturt). The pre-emergence (PRE) herbicides viz., atrazine, pendimethalin and oxadiargyl were combined either with hand weeding (HW) and interculturing (IC) or with post-emergence (POST) herbicide 2, 4-D (SS) to evolve integrated weed management. The weed flora of the experimental site constituted Digera arvensis, Cyperus rotundus, Brachiaria spp., Asphodelus tenuifolius, Indigofera glandulosa, Amaranthus viridis, Acanthospermum hispidum, Panicum colonum, Launaea nudicaulis, Euphorbia hirta, Chenopodium album, Portulaca oleracea, Dactyloctenium aegyptium and Celosia argentea. The results revealed that physical methods viz., weed free, HW and IC twice at 15 and 30 days after sowing (DAS) as well as integrated methods viz., atrazine @ 0.5 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS and pendimethalin @ 0.9 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS significantly enhanced growth and yield attributes ultimately higher cob and fodder yields over unweeded check. The treatments viz., weed free, HW and IC twice at 15 and 30 DAS, atrazine @ 0.5 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS, and pendimethalin @ 0.9 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS also recorded the lower weed population at 30, 60 DAS and at harvest, dry weight of weed at harvest with lower weed index and higher weed control efficiency and herbicidal efficiency index. These treatments were found economical by recording higher net returns and B: C ratio compared to unweeded check.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Physical weed control (weed free, hand weeding and interculture twice) significantly enhanced growth and yield attributes of sweet corn over unweeded check.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
physical methods viz., weed free, HW and IC twice at 15 and 30 days after sowing (DAS)e1
Outcome
growth and yield attributese1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
unweeded checke1
Setting
Junagadh (Gujarat, India)e0

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2010-11 at Junagadh (Gujarat, India) to find out most efficient and economical method of weed control in rabi sweet corn (Zea mays L. var. saccharata Sturt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–201 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that physical methods viz., weed free, HW and IC twice at 15 and 30 days after sowing (DAS) as well as integrated methods viz., atrazine @ 0.5 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS and pendimethalin @ 0.9 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS significantly enhanced growth and yield attributes ultimately higher cob and fodder yields over unweeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated herbicide and interculture methods significantly enhanced growth and yield attributes of sweet corn over unweeded check.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
integrated methods viz., atrazine @ 0.5 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS and pendimethalin @ 0.9 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DASe1
Outcome
growth and yield attributese1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
unweeded checke1
Setting
Junagadh (Gujarat, India)e0

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2010-11 at Junagadh (Gujarat, India) to find out most efficient and economical method of weed control in rabi sweet corn (Zea mays L. var. saccharata Sturt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–201 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that physical methods viz., weed free, HW and IC twice at 15 and 30 days after sowing (DAS) as well as integrated methods viz., atrazine @ 0.5 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS and pendimethalin @ 0.9 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS significantly enhanced growth and yield attributes ultimately higher cob and fodder yields over unweeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physical weed control gave higher cob and fodder yields of sweet corn than unweeded check.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
physical methods viz., weed free, HW and IC twice at 15 and 30 days after sowing (DAS)e1
Outcome
cob and fodder yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
unweeded checke1
Setting
Junagadh (Gujarat, India)e0

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2010-11 at Junagadh (Gujarat, India) to find out most efficient and economical method of weed control in rabi sweet corn (Zea mays L. var. saccharata Sturt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–201 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that physical methods viz., weed free, HW and IC twice at 15 and 30 days after sowing (DAS) as well as integrated methods viz., atrazine @ 0.5 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS and pendimethalin @ 0.9 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS significantly enhanced growth and yield attributes ultimately higher cob and fodder yields over unweeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated herbicide and interculture methods gave higher cob and fodder yields of sweet corn than unweeded check.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
integrated methods viz., atrazine @ 0.5 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS and pendimethalin @ 0.9 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DASe1
Outcome
cob and fodder yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
unweeded checke1
Setting
Junagadh (Gujarat, India)e0

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2010-11 at Junagadh (Gujarat, India) to find out most efficient and economical method of weed control in rabi sweet corn (Zea mays L. var. saccharata Sturt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–201 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that physical methods viz., weed free, HW and IC twice at 15 and 30 days after sowing (DAS) as well as integrated methods viz., atrazine @ 0.5 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS and pendimethalin @ 0.9 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS significantly enhanced growth and yield attributes ultimately higher cob and fodder yields over unweeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed control treatments recorded a lower weed population at 30 and 60 DAS and at harvest.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
weed free, HW and IC twice at 15 and 30 DAS, atrazine @ 0.5 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS, and pendimethalin @ 0.9 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DASe2
Outcome
weed populatione2
Direction
lowere2
Setting
Junagadh (Gujarat, India)e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2010-11 at Junagadh (Gujarat, India) to find out most efficient and economical method of weed control in rabi sweet corn (Zea mays L. var. saccharata Sturt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–201 · show in text ↑
e2

“The treatments viz., weed free, HW and IC twice at 15 and 30 DAS, atrazine @ 0.5 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS, and pendimethalin @ 0.9 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS also recorded the lower weed population at 30, 60 DAS and at harvest, dry weight of weed at harvest with lower weed index and higher weed control efficiency and herbicidal efficiency index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed control treatments gave a lower weed index in sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
weed free, HW and IC twice at 15 and 30 DAS, atrazine @ 0.5 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS, and pendimethalin @ 0.9 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DASe2
Outcome
weed indexe2
Direction
lowere2
Setting
Junagadh (Gujarat, India)e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2010-11 at Junagadh (Gujarat, India) to find out most efficient and economical method of weed control in rabi sweet corn (Zea mays L. var. saccharata Sturt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–201 · show in text ↑
e2

“The treatments viz., weed free, HW and IC twice at 15 and 30 DAS, atrazine @ 0.5 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS, and pendimethalin @ 0.9 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS also recorded the lower weed population at 30, 60 DAS and at harvest, dry weight of weed at harvest with lower weed index and higher weed control efficiency and herbicidal efficiency index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed control treatments decreased the dry weight of weed at harvest.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
weed free, HW and IC twice at 15 and 30 DAS, atrazine @ 0.5 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS, and pendimethalin @ 0.9 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DASe2
Outcome
dry weight of weed at harveste2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Setting
Junagadh (Gujarat, India)e0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2010-11 at Junagadh (Gujarat, India) to find out most efficient and economical method of weed control in rabi sweet corn (Zea mays L. var. saccharata Sturt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–201 · show in text ↑
e2

“The treatments viz., weed free, HW and IC twice at 15 and 30 DAS, atrazine @ 0.5 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS, and pendimethalin @ 0.9 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS also recorded the lower weed population at 30, 60 DAS and at harvest, dry weight of weed at harvest with lower weed index and higher weed control efficiency and herbicidal efficiency index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed control treatments gave higher weed control efficiency and herbicidal efficiency index.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
weed free, HW and IC twice at 15 and 30 DAS, atrazine @ 0.5 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS, and pendimethalin @ 0.9 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DASe2
Outcome
weed control efficiency and herbicidal efficiency indexe2
Direction
highere2
Setting
Junagadh (Gujarat, India)e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2010-11 at Junagadh (Gujarat, India) to find out most efficient and economical method of weed control in rabi sweet corn (Zea mays L. var. saccharata Sturt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–201 · show in text ↑
e2

“The treatments viz., weed free, HW and IC twice at 15 and 30 DAS, atrazine @ 0.5 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS, and pendimethalin @ 0.9 kg a.i. /ha as PRE+HW and IC at 30 DAS also recorded the lower weed population at 30, 60 DAS and at harvest, dry weight of weed at harvest with lower weed index and higher weed control efficiency and herbicidal efficiency index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed control treatments gave higher net returns and B: C ratio than unweeded check.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
These treatmentse3
Outcome
net returns and B: C ratioe3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
unweeded checke3
Setting
Junagadh (Gujarat, India)e0

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2010-11 at Junagadh (Gujarat, India) to find out most efficient and economical method of weed control in rabi sweet corn (Zea mays L. var. saccharata Sturt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–201 · show in text ↑
e3

“These treatments were found economical by recording higher net returns and B: C ratio compared to unweeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1641 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

54 papers: 52 positive, 2 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

atrazine · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

202 papers: 197 positive, 5 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

402 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.