Intervention effectmodel-written summary

All weed control treatments gave significantly higher maize grain yield than the weedy check.

A claim from Integrated Weed Management in Maize (Zea mays) under Mid-Hill Conditions of North-Western Himalayas · 1998

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed control treatments gave significantly higher maize grain yield than the weedy check.

Taxon
Maize (Zea mays)Zea mayst0
Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–46
e0

“All the weed control treatments resulted in significantly higher grain yield of maize over weedy check due to a significant reduction in the density and dry matter accumulation by weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–185

Title

Integrated Weed Management in Maize (Zea mays) under Mid-Hill Conditions of North-Western Himalayas

Vinod Sharma; D. R. Thakur Indian Journal of Weed Science 1998

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-42e8465b8d865bcd68dbc94a9562bc6079d8c48c41316c394421c405c967a98d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this claim · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

642 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.