Paper · 2004 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Effect of low molecular size humic substances on nitrate uptake and expression of genes involved in nitrate transport in maize (Zea mays L.)

S. Quaggiotti

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
288
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study, a detailed characterization of earthworm low molecular size humic substances (LMS) was performed and these substances were used to study their effect on the nitrate influx in roots, tissue nitrate content, and expression of maize genes putatively involved in nitrate uptake in maize (Zea mays L.). The results show that the humic fraction with low molecular size used in this study is endowed with the characteristic structural network described for most humic substances so far isolated and confirm the presence of IAA in this fraction. The results also show that the LMS fraction of humic substances stimulates the uptake of nitrate by roots and the accumulation of the anion at the leaf level. Moreover, the analysis of the expression of genes encoding two putative maize nitrate transporters (ZmNrt2.1 and ZmNrt1.1) and of two maize H(+)-ATPase isoforms (Mha1 and Mha2) show that these substances may exert direct effects on gene transcription in roots, as shown for the Mha2 gene, and long-distance effects in shoots, as observed for the ZmNrt2.1 gene.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LMS humic fraction stimulates nitrate uptake by maize roots and nitrate accumulation at the leaf level.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
LMS fraction of humic substancese1
Outcome
uptake of nitrate by roots and the accumulation of the anion at the leaf levele1
Direction
stimulatese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“the LMS fraction of humic substances stimulates the uptake of nitrate by roots and the accumulation of the anion at the leaf level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–710 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The LMS humic fraction contains IAA.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
presence of IAA in this fractione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–140 · show in text ↑
e2

“confirm the presence of IAA in this fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–551 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The LMS humic fraction has the characteristic humic structural network.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
characteristic structural networke3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–140 · show in text ↑
e3

“endowed with the characteristic structural network”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LMS humic substances may exert direct effects on gene transcription in maize roots, as shown for Mha2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
LMS fraction of humic substancese1
Gene
Mha2e4
Outcome
gene transcription in rootse4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“the LMS fraction of humic substances stimulates the uptake of nitrate by roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–658 · show in text ↑
e4

“may exert direct effects on gene transcription in roots, as shown for the Mha2 gene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LMS humic substances may exert long-distance effects in maize shoots, as observed for ZmNrt2.1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
LMS fraction of humic substancese1
Gene
ZmNrt2.1e5
Outcome
long-distance effects in shootse5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“the LMS fraction of humic substances stimulates the uptake of nitrate by roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–658 · show in text ↑
e5

“long-distance effects in shoots, as observed for the ZmNrt2.1 gene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1071 · show in text ↑

other · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 107 positive, 12 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.