Paper · 2013 · Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia)

Comparative effect of activated carbon, pressmud and poultry manure on immobilization and concentration of metals in maize (Zea mays) grown on contaminated soil

Muhammad Sabir; Mohamed Hanafi; Tariq Aziz; et al.

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
37
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Metal contamination of the soils is a widespread problem and immobilization of metals with organic amendments is one of the differentremediation technologies. We investigated the effect of activated carbon, poultry manure and pressmud on immobilization of nickel, manganese, copper, zinc, iron and lead in the contaminated soil, plant growth and metal concentrations in maize shoots. The amendments were applied to the soil at the rate of 4% on dry weight basis. Amendments significantly (P <0.001) affected shoot dry weight and concentrations ofall metals in maize shoots as compared to the control. The maximum shoot dry weight (4.54 g pot-1) was recorded with pressmud, while it was minimum with the control (2.22 g pot-1). Maize shoots contained theminimum nickel (3.54 mg kg-1) with activated carbon and the minimumconcentrations of manganese (11.02 mg kg-1), zinc (48.06 mg kg-1) and iron (104.66 mg kg-1) were recorded with pressmud. Maize shoots contained the minimum concentrations of copper (25.41 mg kg-1) and lead (53.40 mg kg-1) with poultry manure and control, respectively. Amendments significantly (P <0.001) decreased ammonium bicarbonate-diethylenetriamine penta acetic acid (AB-DTPA) extractable concentrations of metals except lead. Activated carbon treated pots had minimum AB-DTPA extractable concentrations of all the metals except iron and lead. Activated carbon was most effective in immobilization of Ni, Mn, Zn and Cu decreasing AB-DTPA extractable Ni in the soil, while Fe and Pb wasincreased due to application of other amendments. © 2013 Friends Science Publishers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amendments significantly affected maize shoot dry weight and all measured shoot metal concentrations.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Amendmentse0
Outcome
shoot dry weight and concentrations ofall metalse0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amendments significantly (P <0.001) affected shoot dry weight and concentrations ofall metals in maize shoots as compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pressmud produced maximum shoot dry weight of 4.54 g pot-1 versus 2.22 g pot-1 in the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
pressmude0
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.54 g pot-1e0
Qualifier
2.22 g pot-1e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum shoot dry weight (4.54 g pot-1) was recorded with pressmud, while it was minimum with the control (2.22 g pot-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Activated carbon yielded minimum maize shoot nickel concentration of 3.54 mg kg-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
activated carbone0
Outcome
nickele0
Direction
theminimume0
Value
3.54 mg kg-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize shoots contained theminimum nickel (3.54 mg kg-1) with activated carbon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pressmud yielded minimum maize shoot manganese concentration of 11.02 mg kg-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
pressmude0
Outcome
manganesee0
Direction
minimumconcentrationse0
Value
11.02 mg kg-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimumconcentrations of manganese (11.02 mg kg-1), zinc (48.06 mg kg-1) and iron (104.66 mg kg-1) were recorded with pressmud”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pressmud yielded minimum maize shoot zinc concentration of 48.06 mg kg-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
pressmude0
Outcome
zince0
Direction
minimumconcentrationse0
Value
48.06 mg kg-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimumconcentrations of manganese (11.02 mg kg-1), zinc (48.06 mg kg-1) and iron (104.66 mg kg-1) were recorded with pressmud”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pressmud yielded minimum maize shoot iron concentration of 104.66 mg kg-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
pressmude0
Outcome
irone0
Direction
minimumconcentrationse0
Value
104.66 mg kg-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimumconcentrations of manganese (11.02 mg kg-1), zinc (48.06 mg kg-1) and iron (104.66 mg kg-1) were recorded with pressmud”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure yielded minimum maize shoot copper concentration of 25.41 mg kg-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
poultry manuree0
Outcome
coppere0
Direction
minimume0
Value
25.41 mg kg-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum concentrations of copper (25.41 mg kg-1) and lead (53.40 mg kg-1) with poultry manure and control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control yielded minimum maize shoot lead concentration of 53.40 mg kg-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
leade0
Direction
minimume0
Value
53.40 mg kg-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum concentrations of copper (25.41 mg kg-1) and lead (53.40 mg kg-1) with poultry manure and control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amendments significantly reduced soil extractable metals except lead.

Treatment
Amendmentse0
Outcome
AB-DTPA) extractable concentrations of metalse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
except leade0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Amendments significantly (P <0.001) decreased ammonium bicarbonate-diethylenetriamine penta acetic acid (AB-DTPA) extractable concentrations of metals except lead.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1252 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Activated carbon gave minimum soil extractable metals except iron and lead.

Treatment
Activated carbone0
Outcome
AB-DTPA extractable concentrationse0
Direction
minimume0
Qualifier
except iron and leade0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Activated carbon treated pots had minimum AB-DTPA extractable concentrations of all the metals except iron and lead.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Activated carbon was most effective for immobilization of Ni, Mn, Zn and Cu.

Treatment
Activated carbone0
Outcome
immobilization of Ni, Mn, Zn and Cue0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Activated carbon was most effective in immobilization of Ni, Mn, Zn and Cu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other amendments increased soil Fe and Pb.

Treatment
other amendmentse0
Outcome
Fe and Pbe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fe and Pb wasincreased due to application of other amendments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1559 · show in text ↑

other · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 107 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 107 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.