Paper · 2012 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

ESTIMATING SHORT- AND MEDIUM-TERM AVAILABILITY TO CEREALS OF NITROGEN FROM ORGANIC RESIDUES

C. M. d. S. Cordovil; M. J. Goss; J. Coutinho; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Overused soil resources and the build-up of organic residues from industrial processes have resulted in increased risk of environmental contamination. Recycling of organic residues from industry by incorporation into agricultural soil, can provide valuable organic amendment as well as supply nutrients to crops. The effect of applying organic amendments to an agricultural sandy soil on the nitrogen nutrition of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and residual effects on the growth of a following maize crop (Zea mays, L.), were assessed under semi-controlled environmental conditions and were compared to nitrogen mineralization prediction obtained from an aerobic incubation. Six different organic residues (composted municipal solid waste, secondary pulp-mill sludge, hornmeal, poultry manure, the solid phase from pig slurry and composted pig manure) were added to a Cambic arenosol, incubated or used in pot experiments, to evaluate and try to predict the availability to crop plants of nitrogen released from these materials. Poultry manure was the most effective amendment in making nitrogen available and enhancing nitrogen uptake by wheat plants resulting in greater dry matter yield. The dried solid phase from pig slurry and hornmeal were also beneficial to wheat growth. There was a greater recovery of nitrogen (N), from organic materials studied, by a maize crop. Poultry manure was the residue that provided a greater residual effect on N supply to maize. Keywords: maizeorganic residuessandy soilshort-time and residual supply of nitrogenwheat ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank the Science and Technology Foundation for financial support and Isabel Carvalho and Paula Gonçalves for technical assistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure was most effective for nitrogen availability and wheat nitrogen uptake.

Treatment
Poultry manuree0
Outcome
nitrogen available and enhancing nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poultry manure was the most effective amendment in making nitrogen available and enhancing nitrogen uptake by wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure increased wheat dry matter yield.

Treatment
Poultry manuree0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poultry manure was the most effective amendment in making nitrogen available and enhancing nitrogen uptake by wheat plants resulting in greater dry matter yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dried pig-slurry solid phase benefited wheat growth.

Treatment
dried solid phase from pig slurrye0
Outcome
wheat growthe0
Direction
beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dried solid phase from pig slurry and hornmeal were also beneficial to wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hornmeal benefited wheat growth.

Treatment
hornmeale0
Outcome
wheat growthe0
Direction
beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dried solid phase from pig slurry and hornmeal were also beneficial to wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1286 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize recovered more nitrogen from the organic materials.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
recovery of nitrogen (N)e0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a greater recovery of nitrogen (N), from organic materials studied, by a maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure provided the greatest residual nitrogen supply to maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Poultry manuree0
Outcome
N supply to maizee0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poultry manure was the residue that provided a greater residual effect on N supply to maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1474 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

162 papers: 137 positive, 25 negative or no effect

136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

158 papers more in this group

See all 162 papers →

processing · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 34 positive, 28 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.