Paper · 2010 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Nitrogen and water requirements of fertigated cabbage in Ontario

A W McKeown; S M Westerveld; C J Bakker

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Increasing nutrient and water regulations have necessitated development of best management practices for application of nitrogen (N) and water. This study was conducted to determine if there was an optimal balance of N and water applied for late storage cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata). Five rates of N and five irrigation rates arranged in a response surface design replicated three times were supplied to Huron cabbage grown on sandy loam soil to study the interaction of N and water applied. Plots were located at the University of Guelph, Simcoe Research Station, Ontario, Canada from 2003 to 2005. Total and marketable yields were maximized from a low of 278 kg ha -1 N in 2005 to above the highest rate tested (400 kg ha -1 N) in the other 2 yr. In 2005, there were 29 d above 30 °C and marketable yield was 49% lower than 2004, which had only 1 d above 30 °C. A target soil water value of 100% of field capacity was required to maximize yield in all 3 yr. More N is required as the water supply increases. The main influence of irrigation and N application was on head volume. Head density based on fresh weight was not influenced by irrigation or N application, but head density based on dry weight decreased with increased N application. Irrigation and N application should be managed concurrently to maximize yield and quality and N and irrigation efficiency for late storage cabbage. However, N and water will not prevent lost yield due to hot days, which suggests that late-cabbage yields are very sensitive to high air temperatures. Key words: Brassica oleracea var. capitata, cabbage, irrigation, fertigation, quality, nutrient management, air temperature

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield maximizing nitrogen rates ranged from 278 kg ha -1 N in 2005 to above 400 kg ha -1 N in the other two years.

Outcome
Total and marketable yieldse0
Value
278 kg ha -1 Ne0
Qualifier
above the highest rate tested (400 kg ha -1 N) in the other 2 yre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total and marketable yields were maximized from a low of 278 kg ha -1 N in 2005 to above the highest rate tested (400 kg ha -1 N) in the other 2 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable cabbage yield in hot 2005 was 49% lower than in 2004.

Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
49%e0
Qualifier
29 d above 30 °Ce0
Comparator
2004e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2005, there were 29 d above 30 °C and marketable yield was 49% lower than 2004, which had only 1 d above 30 °C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A soil water target of 100% field capacity maximized yield in all three years.

Treatment
100% of field capacitye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximizee0
Qualifier
all 3 yre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A target soil water value of 100% of field capacity was required to maximize yield in all 3 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nitrogen requirement rose as water supply increased.

Treatment
water supplye0
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
Moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More N is required as the water supply increases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and nitrogen application mainly influenced cabbage head volume.

Treatment
irrigation and N applicatione0
Outcome
head volumee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main influence of irrigation and N application was on head volume.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and nitrogen application did not influence head density based on fresh weight.

Treatment
irrigation or N applicatione0
Outcome
Head density based on fresh weighte0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Head density based on fresh weight was not influenced by irrigation or N application, but head density based on dry weight decreased with increased N application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Head density based on dry weight decreased with increased nitrogen application.

Treatment
increased N applicatione0
Outcome
head density based on dry weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Head density based on fresh weight was not influenced by irrigation or N application, but head density based on dry weight decreased with increased N application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend managing nitrogen and irrigation together to maximize cabbage yield, quality and input efficiency.

Outcome
maximize yield and quality and N and irrigation efficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation and N application should be managed concurrently to maximize yield and quality and N and irrigation efficiency for late storage cabbage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1407 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that nitrogen and water cannot prevent yield loss from hot days.

Taxon
late-cabbagee0
Treatment
N and watere0
Outcome
lost yielde0
Qualifier
hot dayse0

Verbatim

e0

“N and water will not prevent lost yield due to hot days, which suggests that late-cabbage yields are very sensitive to high air temperatures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1558 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 18 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 90 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 90 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.