Paper · 2015 · Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Agricultura

RESPONSE OF SOME SPRING WHEAT CULTIVARS TO DIVERSE MINERAL NPK FERTILIZATION

D. Bobrecka-Jamro; A. Jarecka; Wacław Jarecki

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Mineral fertilization is one of the most important components of proper cultivation technology of spring wheat. It actually determines the quantity and quality of grain yield. In 2011-2013 a strict field experiment was carried out which aimed to determine the response of chosen spring wheat cultivars to two NPK fertilization levels. In the research hypothesis it was assumed that varied rates of NPK fertilization will modify the canopy structure, the state of plant nutrition and the quantity and quality of spring wheat grain yield. Two fertilization levels were used: 80 N; 43.6 P and 83 K kg·ha -1 (level I) and 120 N; 65.4 P and 124.5 K kg·ha -1 (level II). The tested cultivars were: Hewilla, Monsun, Nawra, Ostka Smolicka, Waluta, Zadra, Żura. The higher rate of mineral fertilization in comparison with the lower one resulted in a significant increase in SPAD and LAI indices values, whereas it did not modify MTA index. The number of ears per 1 m 2 was higher on treatment with the higher fertilization level as compared with the lower. The obtained difference was significant and on average it amounted to 26 no.·m 2 . The number of grains per ear and TGW were not modified by the fertilization factor. Spring wheat gave the highest yields in 2012 and the lowest in 2013. After the use of the higher fertilization level, the mean grain yield amounted to 5.83 Mg·ha -1 and was significantly higher than on the treatment with the lower fertilization level (4.89 Mg·ha -1 ). Plants of the cultivar Ostka Smolicka were characterized by a significantly higher LAI index in relations to the cultivar Monsun, whereas MTA index was significantly higher in plants of the cultivar Waluta in comparison with the cultivar Żura. The highest value of SPAD index was recorded in plants of the cultivars Hewilla and Ostka Smolicka, and significantly lower in the cultivar Żura. Moreover, a significant difference was indicated in SPAD between the cultivars Nawra and Ostka Smolicka. Plants of the cultivar Waluta lodged significantly heavier than those of the cultivar Nawra. More plump grains were formed by Nawra as compared with Zadra. Ostka Smolnicka was characterized by the highest yield, and Monsun, Nawra and Waluta by significantly lower yields. Also it was

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fertilization significantly increased spring wheat SPAD and LAI indices.

Taxon
SPRING WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
higher rate of mineral fertilizatione0
Outcome
SPAD and LAI indices valuese0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
lower onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher rate of mineral fertilization in comparison with the lower one resulted in a significant increase in SPAD and LAI indices values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fertilization did not modify the MTA index.

Taxon
SPRING WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
higher rate of mineral fertilizatione1
Outcome
MTA indexe0
Direction
did not modifye0
Comparator
lower onee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas it did not modify MTA index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–929 · show in text ↑
e1

“The higher rate of mineral fertilization in comparison with the lower one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fertilization significantly increased ears per square metre by 26.

Taxon
SPRING WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
higher fertilization levele0
Outcome
number of ears per 1 m 2e0
Direction
highere0
Value
26 no.·m 2e0
Comparator
the lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of ears per 1 m 2 was higher on treatment with the higher fertilization level as compared with the lower. The obtained difference was significant and on average it amounted to 26 no.·m 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization did not modify grains per ear or thousand grain weight.

Taxon
SPRING WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fertilization factore0
Outcome
number of grains per ear and TGWe0
Direction
not modifiede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of grains per ear and TGW were not modified by the fertilization factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring wheat yielded most in 2012 and least in 2013.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highest yields in 2012 and the lowest in 2013e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring wheat gave the highest yields in 2012 and the lowest in 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fertilization produced 5.83 Mg·ha -1 grain yield, significantly above 4.89 Mg·ha -1 under lower fertilization.

Taxon
SPRING WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
higher fertilization levele0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.83 Mg·ha -1e0
Qualifier
4.89 Mg·ha -1e0
Comparator
lower fertilization levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After the use of the higher fertilization level, the mean grain yield amounted to 5.83 Mg·ha -1 and was significantly higher than on the treatment with the lower fertilization level (4.89 Mg·ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1482 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ostka Smolicka had a significantly higher LAI than Monsun.

Taxon
SPRING WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Ostka Smolickae0
Outcome
LAI indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Monsune0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants of the cultivar Ostka Smolicka were characterized by a significantly higher LAI index in relations to the cultivar Monsun”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1612 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waluta had a significantly higher MTA index than Żura.

Taxon
SPRING WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Walutae0
Outcome
MTA indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Żurae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MTA index was significantly higher in plants of the cultivar Waluta in comparison with the cultivar Żura”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1726 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hewilla and Ostka Smolicka had the highest SPAD index, above Żura.

Taxon
SPRING WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Hewilla and Ostka Smolickae0
Outcome
SPAD indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Żurae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest value of SPAD index was recorded in plants of the cultivars Hewilla and Ostka Smolicka, and significantly lower in the cultivar Żura”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1728–1872 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nawra and Ostka Smolicka differed significantly in SPAD.

Taxon
SPRING WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Nawra and Ostka Smolickae0
Outcome
SPADe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant difference was indicated in SPAD between the cultivars Nawra and Ostka Smolicka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1884–1977 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waluta lodged significantly more heavily than Nawra.

Taxon
SPRING WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Walutae0
Outcome
lodgede0
Direction
heaviere0
Comparator
Nawrae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants of the cultivar Waluta lodged significantly heavier than those of the cultivar Nawra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1979–2070 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nawra formed plumper grains than Zadra.

Taxon
SPRING WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Nawrae0
Outcome
plump grainse0
Direction
Moree0
Comparator
Zadrae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More plump grains were formed by Nawra as compared with Zadra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2072–2133 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ostka Smolnicka had the highest yield, while Monsun, Nawra and Waluta yielded significantly less.

Taxon
SPRING WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Ostka Smolnickae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Monsun, Nawra and Walutae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ostka Smolnicka was characterized by the highest yield, and Monsun, Nawra and Waluta by significantly lower yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2135–2249 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 123 positive, 11 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.