Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Higher fertilization significantly increased ears per square metre by 26.

A claim from RESPONSE OF SOME SPRING WHEAT CULTIVARS TO DIVERSE MINERAL NPK FERTILIZATION · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fertilization significantly increased ears per square metre by 26.

Taxon
SPRING WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
higher fertilization levele0
Outcome
number of ears per 1 m 2e0
Direction
highere0
Value
26 no.·m 2e0
Comparator
the lowere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of ears per 1 m 2 was higher on treatment with the higher fertilization level as compared with the lower. The obtained difference was significant and on average it amounted to 26 no.·m 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1128
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29

Title

RESPONSE OF SOME SPRING WHEAT CULTIVARS TO DIVERSE MINERAL NPK FERTILIZATION

D. Bobrecka-Jamro; A. Jarecka; Wacław Jarecki Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Agricultura 2015

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-3f2cd3dd19b7cedb282c7cadfcb8402e7c20d3b6bb88b8b7c7d925bc270cc45c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this claim · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.