Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sulphur fertilization caused a significant increase in wheat grain yield compared with NPK alone in the third year.

A claim from The influence of mineral fertilization on the yield and content of selected macro and microelements in spring wheat. · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur fertilization caused a significant increase in wheat grain yield compared with NPK alone in the third year.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
fertilization with sulphure1
Outcome
yields of wheat graine1
Direction
significant increasee1
Qualifier
third year of the investigationse1
Comparator
the treatment where solely nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium was usede1
Setting
three-year field experimente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The assessment of the effect of fertilization on yielding and contents of selected macroand microelements (nitrogen, sulphur, magnesium, copper and zinc) in the spring wheat yield was conducted in a three-year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–226
e1

“Wheat fertilization with sulphur (irrespective of the applied fertilizer) caused a significant increase in yields of wheat grain in comparison with the yields from the treatment where solely nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium was used in the third year of the investigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–502

Title

The influence of mineral fertilization on the yield and content of selected macro and microelements in spring wheat.

Krzysztof Gondek; A. Gondek Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2010

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-3fb86df73f3eb073147265ef59e9be70bcf16a7763950ddef23f100bc094017e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Sulfur application yielded hardly any benefit.

    Landscape positions dictating crop fertilizer responses in wheat-based farming systems of East African Highlands · 2020

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Sulphur fertiliser had little effect on grain yield or grain nitrogen and sulphur concentration and uptake.

    Management of nitrogen and sulphur fertiliser for improved bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) quality · 2001

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Sulfur rate, source and timing did not affect yield on soils with SOM above 20 g kg −1.

    Do Hard Red Spring Wheat Varieties Vary in Their Response to Sulfur? · 2019

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Sulfur did not increase winter wheat grain yield at any site.

    In‐Season Application of Nitrogen and Sulfur in Winter Wheat · 2019

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Sulfur source treatments had a nonsignificant residual effect on wheat grain yield.

    Effect of Direct and Residual Effects of Different Sulfur Fertilizers on Groundnut and Wheat Cropping System on Typic Haplaquent Soils · 2003

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Sulfur reduced lentil and wheat yields.

    Evaluation of soil pH manipulation on crop production in northern idaho · 1986

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Zinc and sulfur treatments did not affect wheat biomass production or yield.

    Increasing the supply of sulphur increases the grain zinc concentration in bread and durum wheat · 2009

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Additional S fertilizer produced no observed winter wheat yield response at any location.

    On‐Farm Winter Wheat Response to Nitrogen‐, Phosphorus‐, Potassium‐, and Sulfur‐Rich Strips in Oklahoma · 2017 · compared with farmer's fertility practice

    Opposite direction

139 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this claim · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Organic fertilizers stimulated yield less than mineral fertilizers in the first year.

    Effect of fertilization with farmyard manure, municipal sewage sludge and compost from biodegradable waste on yield and mineral composition of spring wheat grain · 2012 · compared with mineral fertilizers

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Higher fertilization significantly increased ears per square metre by 26.

    RESPONSE OF SOME SPRING WHEAT CULTIVARS TO DIVERSE MINERAL NPK FERTILIZATION · 2015 · compared with the lower

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. no effect
    Current high nitrogen practices do not significantly raise crop yields relative to optimum fertilization.

    Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems · 2009 · compared with knowledge-based optimum N fertilization

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Wheat yield declined by 0.04 Mg ha −1 yr −1 with 75 and 100% N-P-K fertilizer.

    Yield and Soil Nutrient Changes in a Long‐Term Rice‐Wheat Rotation in India · 2002

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    The authors concluded that N fertiliser could not compensate for the yield reduction in canola and wheat due to late sowing.

    Effects of sowing time and nitrogen fertiliser on canola and wheat, and nitrogen fertiliser on Indian mustard. I. Dry matter production, grain yield, and yield components · 2001

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Genetic gain in winter wheat yield without fertiliser N was 0.021 t ha −1 y −1, smaller than at 215–250 kg/ha N.

    Responses of grain yield, biomass and harvest index and their rates of genetic progress to nitrogen availability in ten winter wheat varieties · 2006 · compared with 215–250 kg/ha N

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    The fertilizing substances did not significantly change plant yields.

    The influence of chlorothalonil on the activity of soil microorganisms and enzymes · 2018

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Compost did not significantly affect wheat grain yield, biomass or harvest index.

    Responses of Wheat Yield, Macro- and Micro-Nutrients, and Heavy Metals in Soil and Wheat following the Application of Manure Compost on the North China Plain · 2016

    Opposite direction

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.