Paper · 2010 · Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering

The influence of mineral fertilization on the yield and content of selected macro and microelements in spring wheat.

Krzysztof Gondek; A. Gondek

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The assessment of the effect of fertilization on yielding and contents of selected macroand microelements (nitrogen, sulphur, magnesium, copper and zinc) in the spring wheat yield was conducted in a three-year field experiment. Wheat fertilization with sulphur (irrespective of the applied fertilizer) caused a significant increase in yields of wheat grain in comparison with the yields from the treatment where solely nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium was used in the third year of the investigations. Irrespective of the applied fertilization, the greatest straw yield was gathered in the first year of the research, which unfavourably affected the value of grain yield to straw yield ratio. Sulphur fertilization introduced on the treatments NPK+S(S) and NPK+S(P), both in grain and straw caused a marked increase in nitrogen content as compared with this component content assessed in the biomass of plants not fertilized with sulphur. Sulphur content in grain and straw from the treatments where fertilization with this element was used did not differ in comparison with the content determined in wheat biomass from the object where sulphur was not applied. A significant diversification in the value of N:S ratio was observed. The highest values of this parameter in grain and straw were obtained on the treatments where wheat was fertilized with NPK+S. Due to high soil abundance in magnesium, practically no differences in this component content in wheat biomass from individual treatments were found. Considering the fodder value a deficient copper content was noted both in wheat straw and grain, whereas zinc content ranged within the optimal content values.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur fertilization caused a significant increase in wheat grain yield compared with NPK alone in the third year.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
fertilization with sulphure1
Outcome
yields of wheat graine1
Direction
significant increasee1
Qualifier
third year of the investigationse1
Comparator
the treatment where solely nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium was usede1
Setting
three-year field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The assessment of the effect of fertilization on yielding and contents of selected macroand microelements (nitrogen, sulphur, magnesium, copper and zinc) in the spring wheat yield was conducted in a three-year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–226 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat fertilization with sulphur (irrespective of the applied fertilizer) caused a significant increase in yields of wheat grain in comparison with the yields from the treatment where solely nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium was used in the third year of the investigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–502 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrespective of fertilization, the greatest straw yield was obtained in the first year of the research.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
straw yielde2
Direction
greateste2
Setting
first year of the researche2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The assessment of the effect of fertilization on yielding and contents of selected macroand microelements (nitrogen, sulphur, magnesium, copper and zinc) in the spring wheat yield was conducted in a three-year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–226 · show in text ↑
e2

“Irrespective of the applied fertilization, the greatest straw yield was gathered in the first year of the research, which unfavourably affected the value of grain yield to straw yield ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–693 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first-year straw yield unfavourably affected the grain-to-straw yield ratio.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
value of grain yield to straw yield ratioe2
Direction
unfavourably affectede2
Setting
first year of the researche2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The assessment of the effect of fertilization on yielding and contents of selected macroand microelements (nitrogen, sulphur, magnesium, copper and zinc) in the spring wheat yield was conducted in a three-year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–226 · show in text ↑
e2

“Irrespective of the applied fertilization, the greatest straw yield was gathered in the first year of the research, which unfavourably affected the value of grain yield to straw yield ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur fertilization markedly increased nitrogen content in grain and straw compared with plants not fertilized with sulphur.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
grain and strawe4
Treatment
Sulphur fertilizatione4
Outcome
nitrogen contente4
Direction
marked increasee4
Comparator
plants not fertilized with sulphure4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The assessment of the effect of fertilization on yielding and contents of selected macroand microelements (nitrogen, sulphur, magnesium, copper and zinc) in the spring wheat yield was conducted in a three-year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–226 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sulphur fertilization introduced on the treatments NPK+S(S) and NPK+S(P), both in grain and straw caused a marked increase in nitrogen content as compared with this component content assessed in the biomass of plants not fertilized with sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur content in grain and straw did not differ between sulphur-fertilized and unfertilized treatments.

Organ / stage
grain and strawe5
Treatment
fertilization with this elemente5
Outcome
Sulphur contente5
Direction
did not differe5
Comparator
the object where sulphur was not appliede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The assessment of the effect of fertilization on yielding and contents of selected macroand microelements (nitrogen, sulphur, magnesium, copper and zinc) in the spring wheat yield was conducted in a three-year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–226 · show in text ↑
e5

“Sulphur content in grain and straw from the treatments where fertilization with this element was used did not differ in comparison with the content determined in wheat biomass from the object where sulphur was not applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1162 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The N:S ratio differed significantly among treatments.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
grain and strawe7
Outcome
value of N:S ratioe6
Direction
significant diversificatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The assessment of the effect of fertilization on yielding and contents of selected macroand microelements (nitrogen, sulphur, magnesium, copper and zinc) in the spring wheat yield was conducted in a three-year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–226 · show in text ↑
e6

“A significant diversification in the value of N:S ratio was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1232 · show in text ↑
e7

“The highest values of this parameter in grain and straw were obtained on the treatments where wheat was fertilized with NPK+S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1359 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest N:S ratio in grain and straw was obtained with NPK+S fertilization.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
grain and strawe7
Treatment
NPK+Se7
Outcome
values of this parametere7
Direction
higheste7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The assessment of the effect of fertilization on yielding and contents of selected macroand microelements (nitrogen, sulphur, magnesium, copper and zinc) in the spring wheat yield was conducted in a three-year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–226 · show in text ↑
e7

“The highest values of this parameter in grain and straw were obtained on the treatments where wheat was fertilized with NPK+S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1359 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium content in wheat biomass showed practically no differences among treatments.

Treatment
individual treatmentse2
Outcome
component contente2
Direction
practically no differencese2
Qualifier
Due to high soil abundance in magnesiume2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The assessment of the effect of fertilization on yielding and contents of selected macroand microelements (nitrogen, sulphur, magnesium, copper and zinc) in the spring wheat yield was conducted in a three-year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–226 · show in text ↑
e2

“Due to high soil abundance in magnesium, practically no differences in this component content in wheat biomass from individual treatments were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1509 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper content in wheat straw and grain was deficient for fodder value.

Organ / stage
straw and graine3
Outcome
copper contente3
Qualifier
deficiente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The assessment of the effect of fertilization on yielding and contents of selected macroand microelements (nitrogen, sulphur, magnesium, copper and zinc) in the spring wheat yield was conducted in a three-year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–226 · show in text ↑
e3

“Considering the fodder value a deficient copper content was noted both in wheat straw and grain, whereas zinc content ranged within the optimal content values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1669 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc content in wheat was within the optimal range for fodder value.

Outcome
zinc contente3
Qualifier
within the optimal content valuese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The assessment of the effect of fertilization on yielding and contents of selected macroand microelements (nitrogen, sulphur, magnesium, copper and zinc) in the spring wheat yield was conducted in a three-year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–226 · show in text ↑
e3

“Considering the fodder value a deficient copper content was noted both in wheat straw and grain, whereas zinc content ranged within the optimal content values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1669 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 854 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.