Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sulphur content in grain and straw did not differ between sulphur-fertilized and unfertilized treatments.

A claim from The influence of mineral fertilization on the yield and content of selected macro and microelements in spring wheat. · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur content in grain and straw did not differ between sulphur-fertilized and unfertilized treatments.

Organ / stage
grain and strawe5
Treatment
fertilization with this elemente5
Outcome
Sulphur contente5
Direction
did not differe5
Comparator
the object where sulphur was not appliede5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The assessment of the effect of fertilization on yielding and contents of selected macroand microelements (nitrogen, sulphur, magnesium, copper and zinc) in the spring wheat yield was conducted in a three-year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–226
e5

“Sulphur content in grain and straw from the treatments where fertilization with this element was used did not differ in comparison with the content determined in wheat biomass from the object where sulphur was not applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1162

Title

The influence of mineral fertilization on the yield and content of selected macro and microelements in spring wheat.

Krzysztof Gondek; A. Gondek Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2010

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-034439b26d0bb2bc4cdeb6192663aa31d8be86f60c941ae5176c2de5c3f51d56 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this claim · 854 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

950 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.