Paper · 2014 · Advances in Crop Science and Technology

Effect of Nitrogen and Compost on Sugarcane (Saccharum Officinarum L.)at Metahara Sugarcane Plantation

Zeleke Teshome Girma Abejehu

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A study was conducted at Metahara Sugar Estate in Ethiopia with the objectives to determine the optimum rates of nitrogen and compost for sugarcane production, and the effect of compost on soil chemical properties. Four levels of nitrogen (0, 46, 92, and 138 Kg /ha) and five levels of compost (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 ton/ha) were combined in factorial arrangement. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. It was conducted on clay soils (Haplic Cambisols). Soil samples were taken before and after treatment application, and analyzed for pH (1:2.5), ECe, organic carbon, total N, available P, and available K. All the cultural practices were executed as per the estate’s practice. Analysis of the soil indicated that except for pH value, all the salient soil properties including ECe, organic carbon, total nitrogen, available P, and available K were slightly increased due to compost application. Analysis of variance indicated that interaction effect between nitrogen and compost was significant (p<0.05) on stalk girth, stalk weight, cane yield, and sugar yield. Highest cane and sugar yields were obtained when 46 Kg N/ha applied with 15 ton of compost/ha. Net benefit to cost ratio was also found to be the highest, 1.12, for this combination. Therefore, 46 Kg N/ha with 15 ton of compost/ha is recommended for clay soils (Haplic Cambisols).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost slightly increased soil ECe, organic carbon, total nitrogen, available P, and available K.

Treatment
compost applicatione0
Outcome
ECe, organic carbon, total nitrogen, available P, and available Ke0
Direction
slightly increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“except for pH value, all the salient soil properties including ECe, organic carbon, total nitrogen, available P, and available K were slightly increased due to compost application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum Officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH did not share the slight increases in other soil properties after compost.

Treatment
compost applicatione0
Outcome
pH valuee0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“except for pH value, all the salient soil properties including ECe, organic carbon, total nitrogen, available P, and available K were slightly increased due to compost application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–944 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and compost interaction significantly affected stalk girth.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
nitrogen and composte0
Outcome
stalk girthe0
Value
p<0.05e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“interaction effect between nitrogen and compost was significant (p<0.05) on stalk girth, stalk weight, cane yield, and sugar yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum Officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and compost interaction significantly affected stalk weight.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
nitrogen and composte0
Outcome
stalk weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“interaction effect between nitrogen and compost was significant (p<0.05) on stalk girth, stalk weight, cane yield, and sugar yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum Officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and compost interaction significantly affected cane yield.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
nitrogen and composte0
Outcome
cane yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“interaction effect between nitrogen and compost was significant (p<0.05) on stalk girth, stalk weight, cane yield, and sugar yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum Officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and compost interaction significantly affected sugar yield.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
nitrogen and composte0
Outcome
sugar yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“interaction effect between nitrogen and compost was significant (p<0.05) on stalk girth, stalk weight, cane yield, and sugar yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum Officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 46 Kg N/ha plus 15 ton compost/ha combination produced the highest cane yield.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
46 Kg N/ha applied with 15 ton of compost/hae0
Outcome
canee0
Direction
Higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Highest cane and sugar yields were obtained when 46 Kg N/ha applied with 15 ton of compost/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum Officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combination produced the highest sugar yield.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
46 Kg N/ha applied with 15 ton of compost/hae0
Outcome
sugar yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Highest cane and sugar yields were obtained when 46 Kg N/ha applied with 15 ton of compost/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum Officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That combination had the highest net benefit to cost ratio, 1.12.

Treatment
46 Kg N/ha applied with 15 ton of compost/hae1
Outcome
Net benefit to cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.12e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Net benefit to cost ratio was also found to be the highest, 1.12, for this combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1295 · show in text ↑
e1

“46 Kg N/ha applied with 15 ton of compost/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum Officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 46 Kg N/ha with 15 ton compost/ha on clay soil.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
46 Kg N/ha with 15 ton of compost/ha is recommended for clay soils (Haplic Cambisols)e0
Setting
clay soils (Haplic Cambisols)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, 46 Kg N/ha with 15 ton of compost/ha is recommended for clay soils (Haplic Cambisols).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum Officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–70 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.