Paper · 2011 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Influence of different nitrogen sources and levels on yield and quality of banana (Musa spp.)

Ganapathy Keshavan; Mathiyazhagan Kavino; Vinayagam Ponnuswami

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Banana requires heavy manuring for its optimum growth and better fruiting. A field experiment was conducted to gain information on the efficacy of different sources of nitrogen on yield and quality of banana. The results revealed that among the various treatments, 25% nitrogen (N) as calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) + 25% N as urea (U) + 50% N as ammonium sulphate (AS) followed by 25% N as CAN + 50% N as U + 25% of N as AS recorded better values for growth characteristics. Similarly, maximum values for yield parameters were recorded in the same treatments. Higher values for total soluble solids (TSS) and total sugars with least acidity besides better physiological parameters with high available soil and leaf nutrient contents were recorded when mixtures of CAN, U and AS applied as N sources to the plants. Hence, the application of required nitrogenous fertilizer as a mixture of different N sources registered better values in terms of growth, yield, physiological parameters, leaf nutrient contents and quality characters rather than applied as a single source of N. Keywords: banananitrogensources and levelsgrowthyieldphysiology and quality attributes

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25% CAN, 25% urea and 50% ammonium sulphate mixture gave better banana growth characteristics than other treatments.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
25% nitrogen (N) as calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) + 25% N as urea (U) + 50% N as ammonium sulphate (AS)e0
Outcome
growth characteristicse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“25% nitrogen (N) as calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) + 25% N as urea (U) + 50% N as ammonium sulphate (AS) followed by 25% N as CAN + 50% N as U + 25% of N as AS recorded better values for growth characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25% CAN, 50% urea and 25% ammonium sulphate mixture also gave better banana growth characteristics.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
25% N as CAN + 50% N as U + 25% of N as ASe0
Outcome
growth characteristicse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“25% N as CAN + 50% N as U + 25% of N as AS recorded better values for growth characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same nitrogen mixtures yielded maximum banana yield parameters.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
yield parameterse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“maximum values for yield parameters were recorded in the same treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixtures of CAN, urea and ammonium sulphate gave higher total soluble solids and total sugars in banana.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
mixtures of CAN, U and ASe0
Outcome
total soluble solids (TSS) and total sugarse0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values for total soluble solids (TSS) and total sugars with least acidity besides better physiological parameters with high available soil and leaf nutrient contents were recorded when mixtures of CAN, U and AS applied as N sources to the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nitrogen mixtures gave the least acidity in banana.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
mixtures of CAN, U and ASe0
Outcome
aciditye0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“least acidity besides better physiological parameters with high available soil and leaf nutrient contents were recorded when mixtures of CAN, U and AS applied as N sources to the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nitrogen mixtures gave better physiological parameters in banana.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
mixtures of CAN, U and ASe0
Outcome
physiological parameterse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“better physiological parameters with high available soil and leaf nutrient contents were recorded when mixtures of CAN, U and AS applied as N sources to the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nitrogen mixtures gave high available soil and leaf nutrient contents.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
mixtures of CAN, U and ASe0
Outcome
available soil and leaf nutrient contentse0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“high available soil and leaf nutrient contents were recorded when mixtures of CAN, U and AS applied as N sources to the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that mixed nitrogen sources perform better than a single source for banana growth, yield, physiology, leaf nutrients and quality.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
application of required nitrogenous fertilizer as a mixture of different N sourcese0
Comparator
a single source of Ne0

Verbatim

e0

“application of required nitrogenous fertilizer as a mixture of different N sources registered better values in terms of growth, yield, physiological parameters, leaf nutrient contents and quality characters rather than applied as a single source of N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑

ammonium sulfate · nutrient: content · MusaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    The four nitrogen sources did not differ in banana plant nutrition.

    Agronomic efficiency of different nitrogen sources for banana production and fruit quality · 2026 · compared with Urea, urea treated with NBPT, ammonium sulfate, and calcium nitrate

    No difference from an alternativeCites this paper

See all 2 papers →

ammonium sulfate · growth · MusaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.