Paper · 2023 · Ecology Environment and Conservation

Influence of hand trimming and bunch feeding of nutrient on yield and yield attributes of banana cv. Grand Naine

D.N Khalasi; T.R Ahlawat; A.K Pandey

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the year 2018-19 and 2019-20 at Instructional Farm, ACH, and Soil and Water Management Research Unit Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari (Gujarat) to assess the effect of hand trimming and bunch feeding on yield and yield attributes parameters of banana cv. Grand Naine. The investigation comprised of ten treatments and each treatment was repeated thrice in CRD. The treatments viz. Control (T1), KNO3 1% without trimming (T2), KNO3 2% without trimming (T3), SOP 1.5% without trimming (T4), SOP 2.0% without trimming (T5), KNO3 1% with trimming of one apical hand (T6), KNO3 2.0% with trimming of one apical hand (T7), SOP 1.5% with trimming of one apical hand (T8), SOP 2.0% with trimming of one apical hand (T9) and 300g cowdung slurry + 10g SOP +20g ammonium sulphate (T10) were imposed on banana plants of cultivar ‘Grand Naine’. Banana bunch feeding with 300g cow dung slurry + 10g SOP + 20g ammonium sulphate recorded the maximum bunch weight, fruit yield, weight of 3rd hand, finger length, finger girth and finger weight in the pooled study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bunch feeding with cow dung slurry, SOP, and ammonium sulphate produced maximum bunch weight and fruit yield.

Taxon
banana cv. Grand Nainet0
Treatment
bunch feeding with 300g cow dung slurry + 10g SOP + 20g ammonium sulphatee0
Outcome
bunch weight, fruit yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Banana bunch feeding with 300g cow dung slurry + 10g SOP + 20g ammonium sulphate recorded the maximum bunch weight, fruit yield, weight of 3rd hand, finger length, finger girth and finger weight in the pooled study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same feeding treatment produced maximum third-hand weight, finger length, and finger girth.

Taxon
banana cv. Grand Nainet0
Treatment
bunch feeding with 300g cow dung slurry + 10g SOP + 20g ammonium sulphatee0
Outcome
weight of 3rd hand, finger length, finger girthe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Banana bunch feeding with 300g cow dung slurry + 10g SOP + 20g ammonium sulphate recorded the maximum bunch weight, fruit yield, weight of 3rd hand, finger length, finger girth and finger weight in the pooled study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same feeding treatment produced maximum finger weight.

Taxon
banana cv. Grand Nainet0
Treatment
bunch feeding with 300g cow dung slurry + 10g SOP + 20g ammonium sulphatee0
Outcome
finger weighte0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Banana bunch feeding with 300g cow dung slurry + 10g SOP + 20g ammonium sulphate recorded the maximum bunch weight, fruit yield, weight of 3rd hand, finger length, finger girth and finger weight in the pooled study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1094 · show in text ↑

ammonium sulfate · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    The four nitrogen sources did not differ in fruit production.

    Agronomic efficiency of different nitrogen sources for banana production and fruit quality · 2026 · compared with Urea, urea treated with NBPT, ammonium sulfate, and calcium nitrate

    No difference from an alternative

See all 2 papers →

ammonium sulfate · growth · MusaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

infection · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

infection · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

91 papers: 80 positive, 11 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

87 papers more in this group

See all 91 papers →

fertilization · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

128 papers: 118 positive, 10 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

124 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.