Paper · 2009 · http://jast.modares.ac.ir/pdf_4307_2149060d5f6f5cebbfda8133f9b81fda.html

Reduction in Primary Tillage Depth and Secondary Tillage Intensity for Irrigated Canola Production in a Loam Soil in Central Iran

Abbas Hemmat

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The introduction of canola (oilseed rape; Brassica napus L.) as a new source of vegetable oil production in Iran prompts evaluation of the performance of this crop under different tillage systems. A field experiment was conducted to determine the impact of depth and in-tensity of tillage on soil physical properties, crop establishment and yield of irrigated winter canola in a loam soil (Typic Haplargids) near Isfahan in central Iran. In a split-plot design, three primary tillage treatments consisted of moldboard plowing to 20 cm (MP20), two passes of a cultivator first to 10 and then to 15 cm (2TC15), and one single pass of cultivator to 10 cm (TC10), were combined with two seedbed preparation treatments (four passes with a disk harrow as opposed to a single pass with a rotary tiller). Results showed that the soil bulk density in the 0-5 and 5-10 cm layers were not significantly affected by primary tillage treatments. Soil penetration resistance (PR) in the 0-10 cm layer was significantly higher in 2TC15 compared to moldboard plowed soil; however, no significant effect of primary tillage was detected on PR in the 10-20 cm depth. A single pass by a rotary tiller was as effective in seedbed preparation as four passes of a disk harrow, as assessed by bulk density, penetra-

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Primary tillage did not significantly affect bulk density at 0-5 or 5-10 cm.

Treatment
primary tillage treatmentse0
Outcome
soil bulk density in the 0-5 and 5-10 cm layerse0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil bulk density in the 0-5 and 5-10 cm layers were not significantly affected by primary tillage treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil penetration resistance at 0-10 cm was significantly higher under 2TC15 than moldboard plowing.

Treatment
2TC15e0
Outcome
Soil penetration resistance (PR) in the 0-10 cm layere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
moldboard plowed soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil penetration resistance (PR) in the 0-10 cm layer was significantly higher in 2TC15 compared to moldboard plowed soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Primary tillage had no significant effect on penetration resistance at 10-20 cm.

Treatment
primary tillagee0
Outcome
PR in the 10-20 cm depthe0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant effect of primary tillage was detected on PR in the 10-20 cm depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑

tillage · soil: physics · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

tillage · disease · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.