Intervention effectmodel-written summary

No-till plots had less canola root rot than tilled plots.

A claim from Canola Root Rot and Yield Response to Liming and Tillage · 1997

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till plots had less canola root rot than tilled plots.

Treatment
No‐tille0
Outcome
BGRRe0
Direction
lessere0
Comparator
tilled systeme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No‐till plots had higher soil water and canola yields but slightly lower soil pH (0‐ to 20‐cm depth), and lesser BGRR, compared with the tilled system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1566

Title

Canola Root Rot and Yield Response to Liming and Tillage

M. A. Arshad; K. S. Gill; T. K. Turkington; et al. Agronomy Journal 1997. doi:10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900010003x

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e7ae16df2d39a6f22faa22a336091d438e438f081f96a01fdf1a1a2107754fa9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

tillage · disease · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.