Claim · model-written summary
No-till plots had less canola root rot than tilled plots.
- Taxon
- canola
Brassica napus var. napuse0 - Treatment
- No‐tille0
- Outcome
- BGRRe0
- Direction
- lessere0
- Comparator
- tilled systeme0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“No‐till plots had higher soil water and canola yields but slightly lower soil pH (0‐ to 20‐cm depth), and lesser BGRR, compared with the tilled system.”
Title
Canola Root Rot and Yield Response to Liming and Tillage
M. A. Arshad; K. S. Gill; T. K. Turkington; et al. Agronomy Journal 1997. doi:10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900010003x
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Liming reduced canola brown girdling root rot.
- Intervention effect Liming increased canola grain yield by 37% in tilled soil.
- Intervention effect Liming increased canola grain yield by 17% in no-till soil.
- Intervention effect Liming increased canola dry matter by 31%.
- Intervention effect No-till plots had higher canola yield than tilled plots.