Paper · 2010 · University of Alberta Library

Identifying agronomic practices that conserve and enhance natural enemies

Subramaniam, Ravindran

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Yield losses from infestations of root maggots (Delia spp.) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) can be severe in canola crops in central Alberta. Studies were undertaken in central Alberta, Canada to manipulate agronomic practices that have potential to affect crop yield, root maggot infestations, and the survival and abundance of Aleochara bilineata (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae), which is an important natural enemy of root maggots. I investigated tillage regime (conventional versus zero tillage), row spacing, and seeding rate to assess effects on Delia spp. and A. bilineata populations. In general I observed greater root maggot incidence and damage, and greater activity density of A. bilineata, in plots subjected to a conventional tillage regime than in a zero tillage regime. I found relatively greater parasitism of root maggot puparia by A. bilineata in plots subjected to a zero tillage regime than a conventional tillage regime. No consistent effects were observed on A. bilineata activity in relation to seeding rate and row spacing. In this study, there is no evidence to conclude that tillage regime had a significant effect on canola seed yield. Seed yields in relation to seeding rate and row spacing were variable. In the context of integrated pest management in canola cropping systems, I suggest that canola growers utilize zero tillage in conjunction with adopting the currently recommended seeding rates of between 5.6 to 9.0 kg per ha and row spacing of 30 cm because this can bring advantages in terms of improved management of root maggots and other important canola pests like flea beetles and weeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage had greater root maggot incidence and damage than zero tillage.

Treatment
conventional tillage regimee0
Interactor
root maggote0pest
Outcome
root maggot incidence and damagee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
zero tillage regimee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“greater root maggot incidence and damage, and greater activity density of A. bilineata, in plots subjected to a conventional tillage regime than in a zero tillage regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage had greater A. bilineata activity density.

Treatment
conventional tillage regimee0
Interactor
A. bilineataAleochara bilineatae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
activity density of A. bilineatae0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
zero tillage regimee0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aleochara bilineata
Aleochara bilineata · InteractorCBG Photography Group, Centre for Biodiversity Genomics · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater activity density of A. bilineata, in plots subjected to a conventional tillage regime than in a zero tillage regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage had greater parasitism of root maggot puparia by A. bilineata.

Treatment
zero tillage regimee0
Interactor
root maggote0pest
Second interactor
A. bilineataAleochara bilineatae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
parasitism of root maggot pupariae0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
conventional tillage regimee0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aleochara bilineata
Aleochara bilineata · Second interactorCBG Photography Group, Centre for Biodiversity Genomics · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater parasitism of root maggot puparia by A. bilineata in plots subjected to a zero tillage regime than a conventional tillage regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding rate and row spacing had no consistent effects on A. bilineata activity.

Treatment
seeding rate and row spacinge0
Interactor
A. bilineataAleochara bilineatae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
A. bilineata activitye0
Direction
No consistent effectse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aleochara bilineata
Aleochara bilineata · InteractorCBG Photography Group, Centre for Biodiversity Genomics · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No consistent effects were observed on A. bilineata activity in relation to seeding rate and row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage regime showed no evidence of a significant effect on canola seed yield.

Treatment
tillage regimee0
Outcome
canola seed yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is no evidence to conclude that tillage regime had a significant effect on canola seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1150 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yields varied with seeding rate and row spacing.

Treatment
seeding rate and row spacinge0
Outcome
Seed yieldse0
Direction
variablee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yields in relation to seeding rate and row spacing were variable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1221 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The author recommends zero tillage with recommended seeding rates and row spacing.

Outcome
utilize zero tillage in conjunction with adopting the currently recommended seeding rates of between 5.6 to 9.0 kg per ha and row spacing of 30 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“canola growers utilize zero tillage in conjunction with adopting the currently recommended seeding rates of between 5.6 to 9.0 kg per ha and row spacing of 30 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1472 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 42 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

tillage · disease · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.