Paper · 2019 · Revistas SARC

Sanguisorba hybrida: pharmacognostic studies and antimicrobial activity evaluation of crude extracts

Madureira, Ana Margarida; Duarte, Aida; Correia, Ana Isabel; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The genus Sanguisorba L. (Rosaceae) includes perennials that are distributed throughout the northern hemisphere. Some species of this genus are known by their medicinal interest. In the present work the pharmacognostic characterization and the potential antimicrobial activity of several extracts of Sanguisorba hybrida, endemic in Portugal, were evaluated. The leaves of the plant have been observed under microscopy techniques, tector and secretor multicellular trichomes were seen on both leaf surfaces. With histochemical tests the in situ localization of compounds was recognized and the most relevant were mucilages, phenols and terpenoids. Powdered plant material was extracted with n-hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, methanol and water. Their phytochemical survey, through TLC on silica gel plates and the proper reagents, was performed and the previous results with histochemical tests were confirmed. All extracts were tested against reference and multiresistant bacterial strains: Gram-positive (Enteroccocus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Mycobacterium smegmatis); Gram-negative (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhimurium, and Klebsiella pneumoniae) and the yeast Candida albicans. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined by the serial broth micro dilution method. Appropriated antibiotics were used as controls. The methanol and water extracts showed better antimicrobial activity than n-hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate extracts. Gram-positive bacteria were the most sensitive and the MIC values of 3.50-1.75 µg/mL were obtained using those polar extracts against Staphylococcus aureus, including strains resistant to meticillin (MRSA).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tector and secretor multicellular trichomes were seen on both leaf surfaces of S. hybrida.

Taxon
Sanguisorba hybridat0
Organ / stage
leaf surfacese0
Outcome
tector and secretor multicellular trichomese0

Verbatim

e0

“tector and secretor multicellular trichomes were seen on both leaf surfaces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sanguisorba hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Histochemical tests localized mucilages, phenols and terpenoids as the most relevant compounds in situ.

Taxon
Sanguisorba hybridat0
Outcome
mucilages, phenols and terpenoidse0

Verbatim

e0

“With histochemical tests the in situ localization of compounds was recognized and the most relevant were mucilages, phenols and terpenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sanguisorba hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The TLC phytochemical survey confirmed the earlier histochemical results.

Taxon
Sanguisorba hybridat0
Outcome
previous results with histochemical tests were confirmede0

Verbatim

e0

“the previous results with histochemical tests were confirmed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sanguisorba hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanol and water extracts showed better antimicrobial activity than n-hexane, dichloromethane and ethyl acetate extracts.

Taxon
Sanguisorba hybridat0
Treatment
methanol and water extractse0
Outcome
antimicrobial activitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
n-hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate extractse0

Verbatim

e0

“The methanol and water extracts showed better antimicrobial activity than n-hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1513 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sanguisorba hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gram-positive bacteria were the most sensitive to the extracts.

Taxon
Sanguisorba hybridat0
Interactor
Gram-positive bacteriae0other
Outcome
most sensitivee0

Verbatim

e0

“Gram-positive bacteria were the most sensitive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1561 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sanguisorba hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The polar extracts gave MIC values of 3.50-1.75 µg/mL against Staphylococcus aureus, including MRSA strains.

Taxon
Sanguisorba hybridat0
Interactor
Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus aureuse0other
Outcome
MIC valuese0
Value
3.50-1.75 µg/mLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus aureus · InteractorContent Providers(s): CDC/ Matthew J. Arduino, DRPH Photo Credit: Janice Haney Carr · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the MIC values of 3.50-1.75 µg/mL were obtained using those polar extracts against Staphylococcus aureus, including strains resistant to meticillin (MRSA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1720 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sanguisorba hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑