Paper · 1996 · TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY

Corn Grain Yield Response to Adequate and Deficit Irrigation

Osman YILDIRIM; Süleyman KODAL; Fatih SELENAY; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was planned to determine the effects of both adequate and limited soil water supplies on grain yields of corn (Zea mays L.) during total and individual growth periods. Soil water deficits during certain growth periods were created by nonirrigation. The experiments were conducted at the Experimental Station of the Agricultural Faculty of the University of Ankara, in 1991 and 1992. The highest and the lowest grain yields were 10.85 t/ha from the plots with full irrigation and 3.47 t/ha from those without irrigation during the total growing period, respectively. Witholding irrigation during the ripening period did not affect the grain yield significantly. The greatest sensitivity to soil water deficit was at the flowering stage. Relative grain yield reductions were found to be 27.9%, 25.2%, 21.2%, 57%, 27.9%, 50.8%, and 68% when irrigation water was not applied during the vegetative, flowering, yield formation, vegetative and flowering, vegetative and yield formation, flowering and yield formation, and total growing periods, respectively. The yield response factor, ky, was found to be 0.97 for the total growing period, 0.78 for the flowering, and 0.47 for the vegetative and yield formation periods. According to these results, it was concluded than corn was rather sensitive to soil water deficits and should be irrigated throughout the total growing season with the exception of the ripening period to obtain high grain yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation produced the highest grain yield of 10.85 t/ha.

Treatment
full irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.85 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest and the lowest grain yields were 10.85 t/ha from the plots with full irrigation and 3.47 t/ha from those without irrigation during the total growing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No irrigation over the total growing period produced the lowest grain yield of 3.47 t/ha.

Treatment
without irrigation during the total growing periode0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3.47 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest and the lowest grain yields were 10.85 t/ha from the plots with full irrigation and 3.47 t/ha from those without irrigation during the total growing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding irrigation during ripening did not significantly affect grain yield.

Treatment
Witholding irrigation during the ripening periode0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Witholding irrigation during the ripening period did not affect the grain yield significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn had the greatest sensitivity to water deficit at flowering.

Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Outcome
sensitivity to soil water deficite0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest sensitivity to soil water deficit was at the flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting irrigation during the vegetative period reduced relative grain yield by 27.9%.

Treatment
irrigation water was not applied during the vegetativee0
Outcome
Relative grain yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
27.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative grain yield reductions were found to be 27.9%, 25.2%, 21.2%, 57%, 27.9%, 50.8%, and 68% when irrigation water was not applied during the vegetative, flowering, yield formation, vegetative and flowering, vegetative and yield formation, flowering and yield formation, and total growing periods, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting irrigation during flowering reduced relative grain yield by 25.2%.

Outcome
Relative grain yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
25.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative grain yield reductions were found to be 27.9%, 25.2%, 21.2%, 57%, 27.9%, 50.8%, and 68% when irrigation water was not applied during the vegetative, flowering, yield formation, vegetative and flowering, vegetative and yield formation, flowering and yield formation, and total growing periods, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting irrigation during yield formation reduced relative grain yield by 21.2%.

Outcome
Relative grain yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
21.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative grain yield reductions were found to be 27.9%, 25.2%, 21.2%, 57%, 27.9%, 50.8%, and 68% when irrigation water was not applied during the vegetative, flowering, yield formation, vegetative and flowering, vegetative and yield formation, flowering and yield formation, and total growing periods, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting irrigation during vegetative and flowering periods reduced relative grain yield by 57%.

Outcome
Relative grain yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
57%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative grain yield reductions were found to be 27.9%, 25.2%, 21.2%, 57%, 27.9%, 50.8%, and 68% when irrigation water was not applied during the vegetative, flowering, yield formation, vegetative and flowering, vegetative and yield formation, flowering and yield formation, and total growing periods, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting irrigation during vegetative and yield formation periods reduced relative grain yield by 27.9%.

Outcome
Relative grain yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
27.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative grain yield reductions were found to be 27.9%, 25.2%, 21.2%, 57%, 27.9%, 50.8%, and 68% when irrigation water was not applied during the vegetative, flowering, yield formation, vegetative and flowering, vegetative and yield formation, flowering and yield formation, and total growing periods, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting irrigation during flowering and yield formation periods reduced relative grain yield by 50.8%.

Outcome
Relative grain yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
50.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative grain yield reductions were found to be 27.9%, 25.2%, 21.2%, 57%, 27.9%, 50.8%, and 68% when irrigation water was not applied during the vegetative, flowering, yield formation, vegetative and flowering, vegetative and yield formation, flowering and yield formation, and total growing periods, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting irrigation throughout the growing period reduced relative grain yield by 68%.

Outcome
Relative grain yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
68%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative grain yield reductions were found to be 27.9%, 25.2%, 21.2%, 57%, 27.9%, 50.8%, and 68% when irrigation water was not applied during the vegetative, flowering, yield formation, vegetative and flowering, vegetative and yield formation, flowering and yield formation, and total growing periods, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield response factor was 0.97 for the total growing period.

Outcome
yield response factore0
Value
0.97e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield response factor, ky, was found to be 0.97 for the total growing period, 0.78 for the flowering, and 0.47 for the vegetative and yield formation periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1224 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield response factor was 0.78 for flowering.

Outcome
yield response factore0
Value
0.78e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield response factor, ky, was found to be 0.97 for the total growing period, 0.78 for the flowering, and 0.47 for the vegetative and yield formation periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1224 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield response factor was 0.47 for vegetative and yield formation periods.

Outcome
yield response factore0
Value
0.47e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield response factor, ky, was found to be 0.97 for the total growing period, 0.78 for the flowering, and 0.47 for the vegetative and yield formation periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1224 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend irrigating corn throughout the season except ripening for high yield.

Outcome
irrigated throughout the total growing season with the exception of the ripening periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn was rather sensitive to soil water deficits and should be irrigated throughout the total growing season with the exception of the ripening period to obtain high grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1454 · show in text ↑

stage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

98 papers: 41 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

224 papers in the same direction as this paper · 791 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.