Paper · 1997 · Peanut Science

Impact of Row Spacing and Planting Date on the Canopy Environment, Abundance of Lesser Cornstalk Borer and Other Arthropods, and Incidence of Aflatoxigenic Fungi in Peanuts

S. D. Stewart; K. L. Boweri; T. P. Mack; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Three row spacings and two planting dates for peanuts, Arachis hypogaea L., were examined in 1993 and 1994 to determine the influence of the canopy environment on lesser cornstalk borer, Elasmopalpus lignosellus (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), other arthropods, and alflatoxigenic fungi. Climatically, 1993 and 1994 were disparate years. Decreasing row spacing increased relative leaf area and light interception by the canopy but, compared to difference between planting dates or years, had a relatively small impact on soil temperatures and relative humidity within the canopy. Late planting produced smaller plants, retarded canopy development, and reduced yield in both years, but especially in 1993 when it was hot and dry. The wide row spacing did not yield as well as twin and normal row spacings in either year. Lesser cornstalk borer damage and aflatoxin concentration were higher in the late planting than in the early planting of 1993, but were unaffected by row spacing. Fewer predatory arthropods were caught as row spacing decreased in both beat and pitfall samples, but planting date had variable effects. Prevailing climatic conditions and planting date appeared to be more important in influencing the canopy environment and pest densities than was row spacing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreasing row spacing increased relative leaf area and canopy light interception.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Decreasing row spacinge0
Outcome
relative leaf area and light interception by the canopye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing row spacing increased relative leaf area and light interception by the canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–438 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing had a relatively small effect on soil temperature and canopy humidity compared with planting date or year.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
row spacinge1
Outcome
soil temperatures and relative humidity within the canopye0
Direction
relatively small impacte0
Comparator
planting dates or yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to difference between planting dates or years, had a relatively small impact on soil temperatures and relative humidity within the canopy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–591 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–172 · show in text ↑
e1

“Decreasing row spacing increased relative leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planting produced smaller plants and retarded canopy development.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Late plantinge0
Outcome
smaller plants, retarded canopy developmente0
Direction
smallere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late planting produced smaller plants, retarded canopy development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planting reduced yield in both years, especially in hot, dry 1993.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Late plantinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
especially in 1993 when it was hot and drye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late planting produced smaller plants, retarded canopy development, and reduced yield in both years, but especially in 1993 when it was hot and dry.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wide row spacing yielded less than twin and normal spacing in both years.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
wide row spacinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not yield as welle0
Comparator
twin and normal row spacingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wide row spacing did not yield as well as twin and normal row spacings in either year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planting increased lesser cornstalk borer damage in 1993 relative to early planting.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
late plantinge0
Interactor
Lesser cornstalk borere0pest
Outcome
Lesser cornstalk borer damagee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
early plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lesser cornstalk borer damage and aflatoxin concentration were higher in the late planting than in the early planting of 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planting increased aflatoxin concentration in 1993 relative to early planting.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
late plantinge0
Outcome
aflatoxin concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
early plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lesser cornstalk borer damage and aflatoxin concentration were higher in the late planting than in the early planting of 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing did not affect lesser cornstalk borer damage or aflatoxin concentration.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
row spacinge0
Interactor
Lesser cornstalk borere0pest
Outcome
Lesser cornstalk borer damage and aflatoxin concentratione0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lesser cornstalk borer damage and aflatoxin concentration were higher in the late planting than in the early planting of 1993, but were unaffected by row spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fewer predatory arthropods were captured as row spacing decreased in beat and pitfall samples.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
row spacing decreasede0
Interactor
predatory arthropodse0other
Outcome
predatory arthropods were caughte0
Direction
Fewere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fewer predatory arthropods were caught as row spacing decreased in both beat and pitfall samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting date had variable effects on predatory arthropod captures.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
planting datee0
Interactor
predatory arthropodse1other
Outcome
predatory arthropodse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting date had variable effects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–172 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fewer predatory arthropods were caught”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1033 · show in text ↑

sowing time · pest · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

sowing time · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

density · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 2 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

sowing time · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 9 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

density · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 17 positive, 5 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

sowing time · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

58 papers: 38 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

density · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 87 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.