Paper · 2001 · Photosynthetica

Effect of Elevated CO2 on Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Rose Plants Grown at High Temperature and High Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density

L. Urban; L. Barthélémy; P. Bearez; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Gas exchange and chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence were measured on young mature leaves of rose plants (Rosa hybrida cvs. First Red and Twingo) grown in two near-to-tight greenhouses, one under control ambient CO2 concentration, AC (355 µmol mol-1) and one under CO2 enrichment, EC (700 µmol mol-1), during four flushes from late June to early November. Supply of water and mineral elements was non-limiting while temperature was allowed to rise freely during daytime. Leaf diffusive conductance was not significantly reduced at EC but net photosynthetic rate increased by more than 100 %. Although the concentration of total non-structural saccharides was substantially higher in the leaves from the greenhouse with EC, ΦPS2 (quantum efficiency of radiation use) around noon was not significantly reduced at EC indicating that there was no down-regulation of electron transport. Moreover, CO2 enrichment did not cause any increase in the risk of photo-damage, as estimated by the 1 - qP parameter. Non-photochemical quenching was even higher in the greenhouse with EC during the two summer flushes, when temperature and photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) were the highest. Hence rose photosynthesis benefits strongly from high concentrations of atmospheric CO2 at both high and moderate temperatures and PPFD.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf diffusive conductance of rose plants was not significantly reduced at elevated CO2.

Taxon
Rose Plantst0
Treatment
Elevated CO2t0
Outcome
Leaf diffusive conductancee0
Direction
not significantly reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Elevated CO2 on Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Rose Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Leaf diffusive conductance was not significantly reduced at EC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthetic rate of rose plants increased by more than 100 % at elevated CO2.

Taxon
Rose Plantst0
Treatment
Elevated CO2t0
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
more than 100 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Elevated CO2 on Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Rose Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“net photosynthetic rate increased by more than 100 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–585 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The concentration of total non-structural saccharides was substantially higher in rose leaves from the greenhouse with elevated CO2.

Taxon
Rose Plantst0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Elevated CO2t0
Outcome
concentration of total non-structural saccharidese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Elevated CO2 on Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Rose Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“the concentration of total non-structural saccharides was substantially higher in the leaves from the greenhouse with EC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The quantum efficiency of radiation use (PhiPS2) around noon was not significantly reduced at elevated CO2, indicating no down-regulation of electron transport.

Taxon
Rose Plantst0
Treatment
Elevated CO2t0
Outcome
quantum efficiency of radiation usee0
Direction
not significantly reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Elevated CO2 on Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Rose Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“ΦPS2 (quantum efficiency of radiation use) around noon was not significantly reduced at EC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment did not increase the risk of photo-damage of rose plants, estimated by the 1 - qP parameter.

Taxon
Rose Plantst0
Treatment
CO2 enrichmente0
Outcome
risk of photo-damagee0
Direction
did not cause any increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Elevated CO2 on Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Rose Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“CO2 enrichment did not cause any increase in the risk of photo-damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-photochemical quenching was higher in the greenhouse with elevated CO2 during the two summer flushes.

Taxon
Rose Plantst0
Treatment
Elevated CO2t0
Outcome
Non-photochemical quenchinge0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
during the two summer flushese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Elevated CO2 on Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Rose Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Non-photochemical quenching was even higher in the greenhouse with EC during the two summer flushes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1095 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · RosaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

co2 · molecular: metabolites · RosaResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.