Paper · 2004 · Weed Technology

Late-Emerging Common Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) Interference in Conventional Tillage Corn

Joseph C. Cordes; William G. Johnson; Peter Scharf; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
39
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Waterhemp has emerged as one of the most problematic weeds in agronomic crops in the Midwest because of an extended germination period and widespread occurrence of biotypes resistant to atrazine and sulfonylurea herbicides. However, the competitive effects of late-emerging cohorts on corn yield are not known. Field studies were conducted in 2001 and 2002 at Columbia, Novelty, and Albany, MO, to determine the effects of late-emerging waterhemp interference on corn growth, nitrogen (N) accumulation, and yield. Waterhemp emerged approximately 20 d after planting (DAP) and was treated at heights of 8, 15, 23, 31, 38, or 46 cm with directed applications of dicamba + diflufenzopyr followed by hand hoeing. Soil water status, corn leaf chlorophyll content, and corn and common waterhemp height were recorded at the time of waterhemp removal. N stress was detected with a chlorophyll meter at four of six removal timings at high waterhemp densities (362 or more plants/m 2 ) but only at one of six removal timings at lower densities (82 or less plants/m 2 ). Water stress was observed at five of the six removal timings at high densities but at none of the removal timings at low densities. High waterhemp densities reduced corn yield when allowed to reach 15 cm before removal, and yields were reduced 36% when not controlled. At low densities, yield losses did not occur unless waterhemp was allowed to remain with corn season long. Our research suggests that waterhemp is less competitive with corn than redroot pigweed, smooth pigweed, and Palmer amaranth. In addition, low densities of late-emerging waterhemp would not warrant removal to protect corn yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High waterhemp densities caused detected nitrogen stress at four of six timings.

Interactor
waterhempe0weed
Outcome
N stresse0
Value
four of six removal timingse0
Qualifier
362 or more plants/m 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N stress was detected with a chlorophyll meter at four of six removal timings at high waterhemp densities (362 or more plants/m 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower waterhemp densities had detected nitrogen stress at one of six timings.

Interactor
waterhempe0weed
Outcome
N stresse0
Value
one of six removal timingse0
Qualifier
82 or less plants/m 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N stress was detected with a chlorophyll meter at four of six removal timings at high waterhemp densities (362 or more plants/m 2 ) but only at one of six removal timings at lower densities (82 or less plants/m 2 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High densities had water stress at five of six timings.

Interactor
Common Waterhempt1weed
Outcome
Water stresse0
Value
five of the six removal timingse0
Qualifier
high densitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress was observed at five of the six removal timings at high densities but at none of the removal timings at low densities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
t1

“Common Waterhemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low densities had no observed water stress at removal timings.

Interactor
Common Waterhempt1weed
Outcome
Water stresse0
Value
none of the removal timingse0
Qualifier
low densitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress was observed at five of the six removal timings at high densities but at none of the removal timings at low densities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
t1

“Common Waterhemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High waterhemp densities reduced corn yield when weeds reached 15 cm.

Treatment
High waterhemp densitiese0
Interactor
waterhempe0weed
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
15 cm before removale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High waterhemp densities reduced corn yield when allowed to reach 15 cm before removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1278 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uncontrolled high waterhemp densities reduced yield 36%.

Treatment
High waterhemp densitiese0
Interactor
waterhempe0weed
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
36%e0
Qualifier
when not controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High waterhemp densities reduced corn yield when allowed to reach 15 cm before removal, and yields were reduced 36% when not controlled.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-density yield loss occurred only with season-long interference.

Treatment
waterhemp was allowed to remain with corn season longe0
Interactor
waterhempe0weed
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Qualifier
low densitiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At low densities, yield losses did not occur unless waterhemp was allowed to remain with corn season long.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1435 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterhemp was interpreted as less competitive than three other pigweeds.

Taxon
waterhempe0
Interactor
cornZea mays subsp. mayse0other
Outcome
competitive with corne0
Direction
less competitivee0
Comparator
redroot pigweed, smooth pigweed, and Palmer amaranthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · InteractorDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our research suggests that waterhemp is less competitive with corn than redroot pigweed, smooth pigweed, and Palmer amaranth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1561 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Low densities of late waterhemp do not warrant removal to protect yield.

Interactor
waterhempe0weed
Outcome
would not warrant removale0
Qualifier
low densities of late-emerging waterhempe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low densities of late-emerging waterhemp would not warrant removal to protect corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1663 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

292 papers: 196 positive, 96 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 196 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

climate site · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 102 positive, 78 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 102 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

176 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.