Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Low-density yield loss occurred only with season-long interference.

A claim from Late-Emerging Common Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) Interference in Conventional Tillage Corn · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-density yield loss occurred only with season-long interference.

Treatment
waterhemp was allowed to remain with corn season longe0
Interactor
waterhempe0weed
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Qualifier
low densitiese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At low densities, yield losses did not occur unless waterhemp was allowed to remain with corn season long.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1435

Title

Late-Emerging Common Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) Interference in Conventional Tillage Corn

Joseph C. Cordes; William G. Johnson; Peter Scharf; et al. Weed Technology 2004. doi:10.1614/wt-03-185r

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-86d82c80fffee59dfa431fe5fafe653579aadf570b043425885caeb769199124 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

292 papers: 196 positive, 96 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this claim · 196 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

283 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

climate site · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 102 positive, 78 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this claim · 102 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

171 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.